From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Jinqian Yang <yangjinqian1@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 00/10] KVM: arm64: Handle effective RES0 behaviour of undefined registers
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 16:13:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250918151402.1665315-1-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
[After yesterday's blunder, I'm reposting this, with proper commit
messages, and having taken Oliver's feedback into account.]
When a feature is removed from a guest, we ensure that the trap and
control bits for that particular feature are made RES0.
For example, SCTLR2_EL2 contains a large number of bits. For any
feature FEAT_FOO that is controlled by a bit FOO in SCTLR2_EL2, we
make sure that SCTLR2_EL2.FOO is RES0 if FEAT_FOO is not visible to
the guest.
However, nothing makes SCTLR2_EL2 RES0 if FEAT_SCTLR2 is not visible.
This series aims at solving this sort of situations. It is still quite
incomplete, but aims at bridging a couple of other series:
- 20250911114621.3724469-1-yangjinqian1@huawei.com which wants to
make EL2-related fields writable to allow migration
- 20250912212258.407350-1-oliver.upton@linux.dev which wants to align
the NV support with the rest of the kernel
Hopefully this helps getting to a point where we everything is
sanitised according to the architecture, EL2 on the same footing as
EL1, and everything migrating in every possible case.
And winning the lottery.
* From v1:
- Commit messages!
- Simplified declaration macros
- Added helpful comments (or so I hope)
- Changed type names according to Oliver's suggestion
Marc Zyngier (10):
KVM: arm64: Remove duplicate FEAT_{SYSREG128,MTE2} descriptions
KVM: arm64: Add reg_feat_map_desc to describe full register dependency
KVM: arm64: Enforce absence of FEAT_FGT on FGT registers
KVM: arm64: Enforce absence of FEAT_FGT2 on FGT2 registers
KVM: arm64: Enforce absence of FEAT_HCX on HCRX_EL2
KVM: arm64: Convert HCR_EL2 RES0 handling to compute_reg_res0_bits()
KVM: arm64: Enforce absence of FEAT_SCTLR2 on SCTLR2_EL{1,2}
KVM: arm64: Enforce absence of FEAT_TCR2 on TCR2_EL2
KVM: arm64: Convert SCTLR_EL1 RES0 handling to compute_reg_res0_bits()
KVM: arm64: Convert MDCR_EL2 RES0 handling to compute_reg_res0_bits()
arch/arm64/kvm/config.c | 357 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 227 insertions(+), 130 deletions(-)
--
2.39.2
next reply other threads:[~2025-09-18 15:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-18 15:13 Marc Zyngier [this message]
2025-09-18 15:13 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] KVM: arm64: Remove duplicate FEAT_{SYSREG128,MTE2} descriptions Marc Zyngier
2025-09-18 15:13 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] KVM: arm64: Add reg_feat_map_desc to describe full register dependency Marc Zyngier
2025-09-18 15:13 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] KVM: arm64: Enforce absence of FEAT_FGT on FGT registers Marc Zyngier
2025-09-18 15:13 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] KVM: arm64: Enforce absence of FEAT_FGT2 on FGT2 registers Marc Zyngier
2025-09-18 15:13 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] KVM: arm64: Enforce absence of FEAT_HCX on HCRX_EL2 Marc Zyngier
2025-09-18 15:13 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] KVM: arm64: Convert HCR_EL2 RES0 handling to compute_reg_res0_bits() Marc Zyngier
2025-09-18 15:13 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] KVM: arm64: Enforce absence of FEAT_SCTLR2 on SCTLR2_EL{1,2} Marc Zyngier
2025-09-18 15:14 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] KVM: arm64: Enforce absence of FEAT_TCR2 on TCR2_EL2 Marc Zyngier
2025-09-18 15:14 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] KVM: arm64: Convert SCTLR_EL1 RES0 handling to compute_reg_res0_bits() Marc Zyngier
2025-09-18 15:14 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] KVM: arm64: Convert MDCR_EL2 " Marc Zyngier
2025-09-19 10:53 ` Ben Horgan
2025-09-19 12:10 ` Marc Zyngier
2025-09-19 7:04 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] KVM: arm64: Handle effective RES0 behaviour of undefined registers Oliver Upton
2025-09-19 13:15 ` Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250918151402.1665315-1-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=yangjinqian1@huawei.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox