From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
To: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>,
Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@google.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>,
james.clark2@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/15] KVM: arm64: Track presence of SPE/TRBE in kvm_host_data instead of vCPU
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2024 15:58:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <80c6cafa-dc17-4a47-8fae-9eea03e69f15@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fac9f76d-d7e4-4a1a-844a-85c64af581b6@arm.com>
On 11/11/2024 13:47, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> Cc: James Clark
>
> Hi Oliver
>
> On 08/11/2024 22:24, Oliver Upton wrote:
>> Add flags to kvm_host_data to track if SPE/TRBE is present +
>> programmable on a per-CPU basis. Set the flags up at init rather than
>> vcpu_load() as the programmability of these buffers is unlikely to
>> change.
>>
>
> Heads up, there is a similar change from James Clark here :
>
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241101155412.1152709-6-james.clark2@arm.com
Ah, bad. That patch isn't on the public list yet. Never mind ;-). I will
leave James to deal with this series ;-).
For context, James is trying to enable Guest filtering for CoreSight
trace, v6 of that one is available here :
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240226113044.228403-1-james.clark@arm.com
Suzuki
>
> This change as such looks good to me.
>
> Suzuki
>
>> Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 18 ++++++++-------
>> arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 3 ---
>> arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c | 36 ++++++++----------------------
>> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/debug-sr.c | 8 +++----
>> 4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/
>> asm/kvm_host.h
>> index ad514434f3fe..07da4129f1d1 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> @@ -610,6 +610,10 @@ struct cpu_sve_state {
>> * field.
>> */
>> struct kvm_host_data {
>> +#define KVM_HOST_DATA_FLAG_HAS_SPE 0
>> +#define KVM_HOST_DATA_FLAG_HAS_TRBE 1
>> + unsigned long flags;
>> +
>> struct kvm_cpu_context host_ctxt;
>> /*
>> @@ -911,10 +915,6 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
>> #define EXCEPT_AA64_EL2_SERR __vcpu_except_flags(7)
>> /* Guest debug is live */
>> #define DEBUG_DIRTY __vcpu_single_flag(iflags, BIT(4))
>> -/* Save SPE context if active */
>> -#define DEBUG_STATE_SAVE_SPE __vcpu_single_flag(iflags, BIT(5))
>> -/* Save TRBE context if active */
>> -#define DEBUG_STATE_SAVE_TRBE __vcpu_single_flag(iflags, BIT(6))
>> /* SVE enabled for host EL0 */
>> #define HOST_SVE_ENABLED __vcpu_single_flag(sflags, BIT(0))
>> @@ -1310,6 +1310,12 @@ DECLARE_KVM_HYP_PER_CPU(struct kvm_host_data,
>> kvm_host_data);
>> &this_cpu_ptr_hyp_sym(kvm_host_data)->f)
>> #endif
>> +#define host_data_test_flag(flag) \
>> + (test_bit(KVM_HOST_DATA_FLAG_##flag, host_data_ptr(flags)))
>> +#define host_data_set_flag(flag) \
>> + (set_bit(KVM_HOST_DATA_FLAG_##flag, host_data_ptr(flags)))
>> +
>> +
>> /* Check whether the FP regs are owned by the guest */
>> static inline bool guest_owns_fp_regs(void)
>> {
>> @@ -1370,10 +1376,6 @@ static inline bool
>> kvm_pmu_counter_deferred(struct perf_event_attr *attr)
>> return (!has_vhe() && attr->exclude_host);
>> }
>> -/* Flags for host debug state */
>> -void kvm_arch_vcpu_load_debug_state_flags(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>> -void kvm_arch_vcpu_put_debug_state_flags(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>> -
>> #ifdef CONFIG_KVM
>> void kvm_set_pmu_events(u64 set, struct perf_event_attr *attr);
>> void kvm_clr_pmu_events(u64 clr);
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
>> index ab1bf9ccf385..3822774840e1 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
>> @@ -617,15 +617,12 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> int cpu)
>> vcpu_set_pauth_traps(vcpu);
>> - kvm_arch_vcpu_load_debug_state_flags(vcpu);
>> -
>> if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, vcpu->kvm->arch.supported_cpus))
>> vcpu_set_on_unsupported_cpu(vcpu);
>> }
>> void kvm_arch_vcpu_put(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> {
>> - kvm_arch_vcpu_put_debug_state_flags(vcpu);
>> kvm_arch_vcpu_put_fp(vcpu);
>> if (has_vhe())
>> kvm_vcpu_put_vhe(vcpu);
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c
>> index 90ecf1210bd0..97d0c6fd5f61 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c
>> @@ -294,40 +294,22 @@ void kvm_arm_clear_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> }
>> }
>> -void kvm_arch_vcpu_load_debug_state_flags(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> +void kvm_init_host_debug_data(void)
>> {
>> - u64 dfr0;
>> + u64 dfr0 = read_sysreg(id_aa64dfr0_el1);
>> +
>> + if (cpuid_feature_extract_signed_field(dfr0,
>> ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_SHIFT) > 0)
>> + *host_data_ptr(nr_event_counters) = FIELD_GET(ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N,
>> + read_sysreg(pmcr_el0));
>> - /* For VHE, there is nothing to do */
>> if (has_vhe())
>> return;
>> - dfr0 = read_sysreg(id_aa64dfr0_el1);
>> - /*
>> - * If SPE is present on this CPU and is available at current EL,
>> - * we may need to check if the host state needs to be saved.
>> - */
>> if (cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field(dfr0,
>> ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMSVer_SHIFT) &&
>> - !(read_sysreg_s(SYS_PMBIDR_EL1) & BIT(PMBIDR_EL1_P_SHIFT)))
>> - vcpu_set_flag(vcpu, DEBUG_STATE_SAVE_SPE);
>> + !(read_sysreg_s(SYS_PMBIDR_EL1) & PMBIDR_EL1_P))
>> + host_data_set_flag(HAS_SPE);
>> - /* Check if we have TRBE implemented and available at the host */
>> if (cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field(dfr0,
>> ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_TraceBuffer_SHIFT) &&
>> !(read_sysreg_s(SYS_TRBIDR_EL1) & TRBIDR_EL1_P))
>> - vcpu_set_flag(vcpu, DEBUG_STATE_SAVE_TRBE);
>> -}
>> -
>> -void kvm_arch_vcpu_put_debug_state_flags(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> -{
>> - vcpu_clear_flag(vcpu, DEBUG_STATE_SAVE_SPE);
>> - vcpu_clear_flag(vcpu, DEBUG_STATE_SAVE_TRBE);
>> -}
>> -
>> -void kvm_init_host_debug_data(void)
>> -{
>> - u64 dfr0 = read_sysreg(id_aa64dfr0_el1);
>> -
>> - if (cpuid_feature_extract_signed_field(dfr0,
>> ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_SHIFT) > 0)
>> - *host_data_ptr(nr_event_counters) = FIELD_GET(ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N,
>> - read_sysreg(pmcr_el0));
>> + host_data_set_flag(HAS_TRBE);
>> }
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/debug-sr.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/
>> nvhe/debug-sr.c
>> index 1e2a26d0196e..858bb38e273f 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/debug-sr.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/debug-sr.c
>> @@ -82,10 +82,10 @@ static void __debug_restore_trace(u64 trfcr_el1)
>> void __debug_save_host_buffers_nvhe(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> {
>> /* Disable and flush SPE data generation */
>> - if (vcpu_get_flag(vcpu, DEBUG_STATE_SAVE_SPE))
>> + if (host_data_test_flag(HAS_SPE))
>> __debug_save_spe(host_data_ptr(host_debug_state.pmscr_el1));
>> /* Disable and flush Self-Hosted Trace generation */
>> - if (vcpu_get_flag(vcpu, DEBUG_STATE_SAVE_TRBE))
>> + if (host_data_test_flag(HAS_TRBE))
>> __debug_save_trace(host_data_ptr(host_debug_state.trfcr_el1));
>> }
>> @@ -96,9 +96,9 @@ void __debug_switch_to_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> void __debug_restore_host_buffers_nvhe(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> {
>> - if (vcpu_get_flag(vcpu, DEBUG_STATE_SAVE_SPE))
>> + if (host_data_test_flag(HAS_SPE))
>>
>> __debug_restore_spe(*host_data_ptr(host_debug_state.pmscr_el1));
>> - if (vcpu_get_flag(vcpu, DEBUG_STATE_SAVE_TRBE))
>> + if (host_data_test_flag(HAS_TRBE))
>>
>> __debug_restore_trace(*host_data_ptr(host_debug_state.trfcr_el1));
>> }
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-11 15:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-08 22:24 [PATCH 00/15] KVM: arm64: Debug cleanups Oliver Upton
2024-11-08 22:24 ` [PATCH 01/15] KVM: arm64: Drop MDSCR_EL1_DEBUG_MASK Oliver Upton
2024-11-08 22:24 ` [PATCH 02/15] KVM: arm64: Get rid of __kvm_get_mdcr_el2() and related warts Oliver Upton
2024-11-11 11:00 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2024-11-12 7:22 ` Oliver Upton
2024-11-08 22:24 ` [PATCH 03/15] KVM: arm64: Track presence of SPE/TRBE in kvm_host_data instead of vCPU Oliver Upton
2024-11-11 13:47 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2024-11-11 15:58 ` Suzuki K Poulose [this message]
2024-11-11 16:09 ` James Clark
2024-11-11 18:17 ` Oliver Upton
2024-11-08 22:24 ` [PATCH 04/15] KVM: arm64: Move host SME/SVE tracking flags to host data Oliver Upton
2024-11-09 11:39 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-11-08 22:24 ` [PATCH 05/15] KVM: arm64: Evaluate debug owner at vcpu_load() Oliver Upton
2024-11-08 22:24 ` [PATCH 06/15] KVM: arm64: Advance debug_owner state machine for sysreg traps Oliver Upton
2024-11-09 11:47 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-11-08 22:24 ` [PATCH 07/15] KVM: arm64: Clean up KVM_SET_GUEST_DEBUG handler Oliver Upton
2024-11-08 22:24 ` [PATCH 08/15] KVM: arm64: Select debug state to save/restore based on debug owner Oliver Upton
2024-11-09 11:57 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-11-09 17:13 ` Oliver Upton
2024-11-08 22:24 ` [PATCH 09/15] KVM: arm64: Remove debug tracepoints Oliver Upton
2024-11-09 12:02 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-11-09 13:17 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-11-08 22:24 ` [PATCH 10/15] KVM: arm64: Remove vestiges of debug_ptr Oliver Upton
2024-11-08 22:24 ` [PATCH 11/15] KVM: arm64: Use debug_owner to track if debug regs need save/restore Oliver Upton
2024-11-09 12:11 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-11-09 17:18 ` Oliver Upton
2024-11-09 22:37 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-11-09 23:46 ` Oliver Upton
2024-11-08 22:24 ` [PATCH 12/15] KVM: arm64: Reload vCPU for accesses to OSLAR_EL1 Oliver Upton
2024-11-08 22:24 ` [PATCH 13/15] KVM: arm64: Compute MDCR_EL2 at vcpu_load() Oliver Upton
2024-11-09 12:28 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-11-08 22:24 ` [PATCH 14/15] KVM: arm64: Don't hijack guest context MDSCR_EL1 Oliver Upton
2024-11-09 12:59 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-11-08 22:24 ` [PATCH 15/15] KVM: arm64: Manage software step state at load/put Oliver Upton
2024-11-09 13:13 ` [PATCH 00/15] KVM: arm64: Debug cleanups Marc Zyngier
2024-11-09 17:08 ` Oliver Upton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=80c6cafa-dc17-4a47-8fae-9eea03e69f15@arm.com \
--to=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=coltonlewis@google.com \
--cc=james.clark2@arm.com \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mizhang@google.com \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox