From: "Mark Williams (MWP)" <mwp@internode.on.net>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Weighted packet shaping?
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 15:19:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041224150730.GA18760@linux.comp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041221034303.GB27656@linux.comp>
> >>For now try making a parent with rate and ceil 220kbit.
> >>Have 4 child/leaf classes like - (assuming 1 is highest priority)
> >>
> >>class 1 rate 120 ceil 220 prio 0
> >>class 2 rate 50 ceil 220 prio 1
> >>class 3 rate 25 ceil 220 prio 2
> >>class 4 rate 25 ceil 220 prio 3
> >>
> >>There are other tweaks you can try, it depends how much you care about
> >>latency. You could also share the windows boxes bandwidth by IP.
> >>
> >>I don't do it quite like the above - so if it doesn't work, say and I'll
> >>think again.
> >
> > <snip>
>
>
> Try to make it look like I said - back off from 256 ceil, make rates add
> up to master rate (220), give interactive more rate than it will ever need.
Ok, im now trying:
class add dev $INTERFACE parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 220kbit
class add dev $INTERFACE parent 1:1 classid 1:20 htb rate 70kbit ceil 220kbit prio 1
class add dev $INTERFACE parent 1:1 classid 1:21 htb rate 50kbit ceil 220kbit prio 2
class add dev $INTERFACE parent 1:1 classid 1:22 htb rate 25kbit ceil 220kbit prio 3
class add dev $INTERFACE parent 1:1 classid 1:23 htb rate 25kbit ceil 220kbit prio 4
class add dev $INTERFACE parent 1:1 classid 1:24 htb rate 25kbit ceil 220kbit prio 5
class add dev $INTERFACE parent 1:1 classid 1:25 htb rate 25kbit ceil 220kbit prio 8
Its simply not working.
Bittorrent is using ~22kb/sec on class 25, leaving the FTP upload (class 22)
sitting on only ~3kb/sec.
Any ideas?
Thanks!
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-24 15:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-21 3:55 [LARTC] Weighted packet shaping? Mark Williams (MWP)
2004-12-22 4:53 ` Mark Williams (MWP)
2004-12-22 9:07 ` Ed Wildgoose
2004-12-22 13:49 ` Andy Furniss
2004-12-22 15:48 ` Mark Williams (MWP)
2004-12-22 22:54 ` Andy Furniss
2004-12-23 10:56 ` Mark Williams (MWP)
2004-12-24 14:08 ` Andy Furniss
2004-12-24 15:19 ` Mark Williams (MWP) [this message]
2004-12-24 16:36 ` Andy Furniss
2004-12-26 4:38 ` Mark Williams (MWP)
2004-12-26 13:09 ` Andy Furniss
2004-12-28 9:35 ` Mark Williams (MWP)
2004-12-29 2:46 ` Andy Furniss
2004-12-29 6:52 ` Mark Williams (MWP)
2004-12-29 13:26 ` Francisco Pereira
2004-12-30 0:05 ` Andy Furniss
2005-01-03 11:22 ` marco ghidinelli
2005-01-04 13:57 ` Andy Furniss
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041224150730.GA18760@linux.comp \
--to=mwp@internode.on.net \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox