From: "Mark Williams (MWP)" <mwp@internode.on.net>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Weighted packet shaping?
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 06:52:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041229065042.GA29441@linux.comp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041221034303.GB27656@linux.comp>
> >Ok...
> >Using your script gave the following (from 17:30 onwards):
> >
> >http://www.overclockers.com.au/~mwp/temp/tc-1hour-yours.png
>
> This is strange I just tested again and it works for me.
>
> http://www.jessingale.dsl.pipex.com/tc-speed-1.png
>
> Blue is lowest with rate 20kbit green next low with 40kbit Red highest.
The result your getting is exactly what im after.
So whats different with what im doing... hrm.
> It may be worth trying with ceils even lower - just incase you get radsl
> adaption and don't really have the bandwidth.
Nah, i have firm 256kbit up.
> I suppose you should also use tc from new iproute2 that matches your kernel.
Ok, where is the correct place to get it from?
I havnt been able to find the official "release site" for iproute2.
> rrdtool seems complicated - I suppose it could be averaging strangely, I
> used -
>
> #set -x
> /usr/local/rrdtool-1.0.49/bin/rrdtool create tcstats1.rrd --step 10 \
> DS:cls21:COUNTER:30:U:U \
> DS:cls22:COUNTER:30:U:U \
> DS:cls23:COUNTER:30:U:U \
> RRA:AVERAGE:0.5:1:100
>
> while [ 1 ]
> do
> C21=`tc -s qdisc ls dev ppp0 | grep "21:" -A 1 | grep Sent |
> awk '{print $2}'`
> C22=`tc -s qdisc ls dev ppp0 | grep "22:" -A 1 | grep Sent |
> awk '{print $2}'`
> C23=`tc -s qdisc ls dev ppp0 | grep "23:" -A 1 | grep Sent |
> awk '{print $2}'`
> /usr/local/rrdtool-1.0.49/bin/rrdtool update tcstats1.rrd
> N:$C21:$C22:$C23
> sleep 10
> done
Thats very similar to what im doing, nothing too complex about it.
I also know the graph is correct as the estimated rates from TC are the same as
shown on the graph.
So this is becoming an unknown problem?
Thanks.
Mark Williams.
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-29 6:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-21 3:55 [LARTC] Weighted packet shaping? Mark Williams (MWP)
2004-12-22 4:53 ` Mark Williams (MWP)
2004-12-22 9:07 ` Ed Wildgoose
2004-12-22 13:49 ` Andy Furniss
2004-12-22 15:48 ` Mark Williams (MWP)
2004-12-22 22:54 ` Andy Furniss
2004-12-23 10:56 ` Mark Williams (MWP)
2004-12-24 14:08 ` Andy Furniss
2004-12-24 15:19 ` Mark Williams (MWP)
2004-12-24 16:36 ` Andy Furniss
2004-12-26 4:38 ` Mark Williams (MWP)
2004-12-26 13:09 ` Andy Furniss
2004-12-28 9:35 ` Mark Williams (MWP)
2004-12-29 2:46 ` Andy Furniss
2004-12-29 6:52 ` Mark Williams (MWP) [this message]
2004-12-29 13:26 ` Francisco Pereira
2004-12-30 0:05 ` Andy Furniss
2005-01-03 11:22 ` marco ghidinelli
2005-01-04 13:57 ` Andy Furniss
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041229065042.GA29441@linux.comp \
--to=mwp@internode.on.net \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox