Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Furniss <andy.furniss@dsl.pipex.com>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Weighted packet shaping?
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 22:54:12 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <41C9FB14.6000805@dsl.pipex.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041221034303.GB27656@linux.comp>

Mark Williams (MWP) wrote:
> Ok.
> 
> My Linux (which is connected to the ADLS modem) box runs HTTP, FTP, etc services and also runs bittorrent, edonkey,
> etc.
> I have two other PCs (both windows) which connect to the internet via the Linux
> box (MASQ).
> 
> Now, i want data like SSH, ICMP, DNS from any source to ppp0 to get top priority.
> I want the two windows PCs to get 2nd priority.
> I want services to get 3rd, and the rest (torrents, etc) to get the lowest
> priority.
> 
> I have this setup atm using HTB and SFQ.
> 
> Now this is what happens:
> I have bittorrent going as fast as possible outbound.
> I then use my linux box to send FTP data over the same link.
> 
> Im finding that packet shaping is splitting the outbound bandwidth (256kbit)
> equally between the two.
> 
> This is not what im after...  want the windows box to take more bandwidth off
> bittorrent than 50% like it is atm.
> 
> Does this explain my problem better?

Yes, you can do this with htb.

You'll need to back off a bit from 256kbit to allow for overheads - this 
is tweakable with patch Ed posted to the list - you could also shape 
incoming, but you would need IMQ which involves patching/doing new kernel.

For now try making a parent with rate and ceil 220kbit.
Have 4 child/leaf classes like - (assuming 1 is highest priority)

class 1 rate 120 ceil 220 prio 0
class 2 rate 50 ceil 220 prio 1
class 3 rate 25 ceil 220 prio 2
class 4 rate 25 ceil 220 prio 3

There are other tweaks you can try, it depends how much you care about 
latency. You could also share the windows boxes bandwidth by IP.

I don't do it quite like the above - so if it doesn't work, say and I'll 
think again.

Andy.

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-12-22 22:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-12-21  3:55 [LARTC] Weighted packet shaping? Mark Williams (MWP)
2004-12-22  4:53 ` Mark Williams (MWP)
2004-12-22  9:07 ` Ed Wildgoose
2004-12-22 13:49 ` Andy Furniss
2004-12-22 15:48 ` Mark Williams (MWP)
2004-12-22 22:54 ` Andy Furniss [this message]
2004-12-23 10:56 ` Mark Williams (MWP)
2004-12-24 14:08 ` Andy Furniss
2004-12-24 15:19 ` Mark Williams (MWP)
2004-12-24 16:36 ` Andy Furniss
2004-12-26  4:38 ` Mark Williams (MWP)
2004-12-26 13:09 ` Andy Furniss
2004-12-28  9:35 ` Mark Williams (MWP)
2004-12-29  2:46 ` Andy Furniss
2004-12-29  6:52 ` Mark Williams (MWP)
2004-12-29 13:26 ` Francisco Pereira
2004-12-30  0:05 ` Andy Furniss
2005-01-03 11:22 ` marco ghidinelli
2005-01-04 13:57 ` Andy Furniss

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=41C9FB14.6000805@dsl.pipex.com \
    --to=andy.furniss@dsl.pipex.com \
    --cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox