* [LARTC] switch to hb3 in production enviroment
@ 2002-05-19 21:18 Playawireless
2002-05-22 20:27 ` Martin Devera
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Playawireless @ 2002-05-19 21:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1301 bytes --]
Hello everyone,
I am following the list since some month and thanks to all the precious indication and to the manuals I went to the following setup:
2Mbit internet---Cisco router
|
Switch--trasparent proxy server
|
bridge/firewallinh/htb2+sqf linux box
|
switch--- wireless and dialup clients
|
network servers
the linux box uses redhat 7.2 with 2.4.18 kernel patched with htb 2 + bridge firewalling, i have 60 htb classes (from 64 to 512 kbit)each with sqf leaf and I am using U32 filter to select source, destination or port.I also have some firewalling iptables rules. I tested the setup for 15 days and then put it in production enviroment since it was very urgent for me. I am very happy with the erformance and it seems to be rock solid. I read something about htb3 and the new aproachso I was thinking to swithch to htb3.
Daes somebody have some results about htb3 stability in production?
In what shall I expect improvement? Somebody out there did the same thing?
Thanks in advance to all the list... I've learned a lot from it :-D
Alfredo Giordano
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3300 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [LARTC] switch to hb3 in production enviroment
2002-05-19 21:18 [LARTC] switch to hb3 in production enviroment Playawireless
@ 2002-05-22 20:27 ` Martin Devera
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Martin Devera @ 2002-05-22 20:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
> the linux box uses redhat 7.2 with 2.4.18 kernel patched with htb 2 + bridge firewalling, i have 60 htb classes (from 64 to 512 kbit)each with sqf leaf and I am using U32 filter to select source, destination or port.I also have some firewalling iptables rules. I tested the setup for 15 days and then put it in production enviroment since it was very urgent for me. I am very happy with the erformance and it seems to be rock solid. I read something about htb3 and the new aproachso I was thinking to swithch to htb3.
> Daes somebody have some results about htb3 stability in production?
> In what shall I expect improvement? Somebody out there did the same thing?
You can stay with versio 2 if you are ok. The main difference in htb3
is speed and ability to handle large number of classes. Qualitative
parameters should be the same.
devik
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-05-22 20:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-05-19 21:18 [LARTC] switch to hb3 in production enviroment Playawireless
2002-05-22 20:27 ` Martin Devera
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).