[LARTC] linux bridging and htb.init / cbq.init

[LARTC] linux bridging and htb.init / cbq.init

[Maik Ellinger]

Hello,

I'am successful using a linux (2.4.20) bridge and the cbq.init_v0.7
 script for traffic shaping. But I can only use the queuing discipline
 tbf (LEAF=tbf). If I try use queuing discipline sfq or none then tc
applies the rules but no shaping occurs.
Is this problem a normal behavior when using bridging ?

I tried to use htb.init (using patched tc binary). It accepts
the rules but also no shaping occurs (tested with all queuing
disciplines (LEAF=none|sfq|pfifo).
Why it doesn't work together with bridging ?

Thanks, Maik
-- 
VFS: Busy inodes after unmount. Self-destruct in 5 seconds.  Have a nice 
day...
GPG-Key: http://www.m-ellinger.de/output/mael.gpg
Mitglied der Zwickau Linux User Group zLUG e.V. -> http://www.zlug.org
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] linux bridging and htb.init / cbq.init

[Mindaugas Riauba]

> I'am successful using a linux (2.4.20) bridge and the cbq.init_v0.7
>  script for traffic shaping. But I can only use the queuing discipline
>  tbf (LEAF=tbf). If I try use queuing discipline sfq or none then tc
> applies the rules but no shaping occurs.
> Is this problem a normal behavior when using bridging ?
> 
> I tried to use htb.init (using patched tc binary). It accepts
> the rules but also no shaping occurs (tested with all queuing
> disciplines (LEAF=none|sfq|pfifo).
> Why it doesn't work together with bridging ?

  Works for me. View my previous post about exceeding limits. It
applies to this setup with shaping bridged traffic.

  Mindaugas

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/