* [LARTC] Depth-argument for sfq?
@ 2003-01-06 13:17 Steen Suder, privat
2003-01-06 16:52 ` Tobias Geiger
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Steen Suder, privat @ 2003-01-06 13:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
I'm not a programmer per se (including C), but...
I'd like to be able to give the define in sch_sfq.c (of, say, 2.4.20),
SFS_DEPTH other values than 128 as an argument on the tc commandline. It
could be powers of two up to 2^7 (128) as it seems that 128 is the
current maximum.
I'm a little anxious to ask the question "How do I do that?" ;-)
Instead I'd like to hear if anyone has done something similar?
--
Mvh. / Best regards,
Steen Suder <http://www.suder.dk/>
ICQ UIN 4133803
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [LARTC] Depth-argument for sfq?
2003-01-06 13:17 [LARTC] Depth-argument for sfq? Steen Suder, privat
@ 2003-01-06 16:52 ` Tobias Geiger
2003-01-06 17:56 ` Stef Coene
2003-01-06 18:01 ` Nikolay Datchev
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tobias Geiger @ 2003-01-06 16:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
Steen Suder, privat wrote:
> I'm not a programmer per se (including C), but...
>
> I'd like to be able to give the define in sch_sfq.c (of, say, 2.4.20),
> SFS_DEPTH other values than 128 as an argument on the tc commandline. It
> could be powers of two up to 2^7 (128) as it seems that 128 is the
> current maximum.
>
> I'm a little anxious to ask the question "How do I do that?" ;-)
> Instead I'd like to hear if anyone has done something similar?
>
AFAIK a qdisc named "esfq" allready exists where you can setup things
like Depth and other parameter.
search the mailling-list archive on lartc.org for the URL (last time i
compilied it was for 2.4.18; i hope they made the code 2.4.20 ready ?)
Greetings
Tobias
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [LARTC] Depth-argument for sfq?
2003-01-06 13:17 [LARTC] Depth-argument for sfq? Steen Suder, privat
2003-01-06 16:52 ` Tobias Geiger
@ 2003-01-06 17:56 ` Stef Coene
2003-01-06 18:01 ` Nikolay Datchev
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stef Coene @ 2003-01-06 17:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
On Monday 06 January 2003 17:52, Tobias Geiger wrote:
> Steen Suder, privat wrote:
> > I'm not a programmer per se (including C), but...
> >
> > I'd like to be able to give the define in sch_sfq.c (of, say, 2.4.20),
> > SFS_DEPTH other values than 128 as an argument on the tc commandline. It
> > could be powers of two up to 2^7 (128) as it seems that 128 is the
> > current maximum.
> >
> > I'm a little anxious to ask the question "How do I do that?" ;-)
> > Instead I'd like to hear if anyone has done something similar?
>
> AFAIK a qdisc named "esfq" allready exists where you can setup things
> like Depth and other parameter.
> search the mailling-list archive on lartc.org for the URL (last time i
> compilied it was for 2.4.18; i hope they made the code 2.4.20 ready ?)
I have it on the faq page on www.docum.org.
Stef
--
stef.coene@docum.org
"Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
http://www.docum.org/
#lartc @ irc.oftc.net
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [LARTC] Depth-argument for sfq?
2003-01-06 13:17 [LARTC] Depth-argument for sfq? Steen Suder, privat
2003-01-06 16:52 ` Tobias Geiger
2003-01-06 17:56 ` Stef Coene
@ 2003-01-06 18:01 ` Nikolay Datchev
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Nikolay Datchev @ 2003-01-06 18:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
http://www.ssi.bg/~alex/esfq/index.html
-- Nikolay Datchev
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Stef Coene wrote:
> On Monday 06 January 2003 17:52, Tobias Geiger wrote:
> > Steen Suder, privat wrote:
> > > I'm not a programmer per se (including C), but...
> > >
> > > I'd like to be able to give the define in sch_sfq.c (of, say, 2.4.20),
> > > SFS_DEPTH other values than 128 as an argument on the tc commandline. It
> > > could be powers of two up to 2^7 (128) as it seems that 128 is the
> > > current maximum.
> > >
> > > I'm a little anxious to ask the question "How do I do that?" ;-)
> > > Instead I'd like to hear if anyone has done something similar?
> >
> > AFAIK a qdisc named "esfq" allready exists where you can setup things
> > like Depth and other parameter.
> > search the mailling-list archive on lartc.org for the URL (last time i
> > compilied it was for 2.4.18; i hope they made the code 2.4.20 ready ?)
> I have it on the faq page on www.docum.org.
>
> Stef
>
> --
>
> stef.coene@docum.org
> "Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
> http://www.docum.org/
> #lartc @ irc.oftc.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
>
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-01-06 18:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-01-06 13:17 [LARTC] Depth-argument for sfq? Steen Suder, privat
2003-01-06 16:52 ` Tobias Geiger
2003-01-06 17:56 ` Stef Coene
2003-01-06 18:01 ` Nikolay Datchev
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox