From: nuclearcat@nuclearcat.com
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] htb v3 not as good as htb v2?
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 14:03:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-106562193732619@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-106562149532078@msgid-missing>
Hello Anton,
Wednesday, October 8, 2003, 4:49:30 PM, you wrote:
I am using HTB3 with more than 10 megabits customers, and
amount of classes about 100-200 without any problem.
Only one what i do - i make filter with lowest priority, to not pass
ass unclassified traffic to default class, just to drop it. I think
you just need review your classes, because also if you have any rate
more 468 Kbit, you need change r2q or quantum.
AY> Hello,
AY> I`ve been using htb v2 for more then a year without any major problems.
AY> Recently I needed to upgrade to newer kernel becouse of non LARTC
AY> related issues. After installing 2.4.22 when the htb qdisc was attached
AY> to the interface even without any rules, I was not able to send more
AY> ~1mbit through the interface. After I reversed the htb3 patch and
AY> rebuild with htb2 everything works as normal. Has anyone experienced the
AY> same issue? thanks
--
Best regards,
Denis mailto:admin@ams-sat.com
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-08 14:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-08 13:49 [LARTC] htb v3 not as good as htb v2? Anton Yurchenko
2003-10-08 14:03 ` nuclearcat [this message]
2003-10-08 14:11 ` Lawrence MacIntyre
2003-10-08 16:56 ` Wilfried Weissmann
2003-10-09 8:44 ` Anton Yurchenko
2003-10-09 16:45 ` Stef Coene
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-lartc-106562193732619@msgid-missing \
--to=nuclearcat@nuclearcat.com \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox