From: Anton Yurchenko <phila@dg.net.ua>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] htb v3 not as good as htb v2?
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 08:44:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-106568935031045@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-106562149532078@msgid-missing>
nuclearcat@nuclearcat.com wrote:
>Hello Anton,
>
>Wednesday, October 8, 2003, 4:49:30 PM, you wrote:
>
>I am using HTB3 with more than 10 megabits customers, and
>amount of classes about 100-200 without any problem.
>Only one what i do - i make filter with lowest priority, to not pass
>ass unclassified traffic to default class, just to drop it. I think
>you just need review your classes, because also if you have any rate
>more 468 Kbit, you need change r2q or quantum.
>
>
the problem was observed even when only adding a qdisc, no classes. how
can this be?
>AY> Hello,
>
>AY> I`ve been using htb v2 for more then a year without any major problems.
>AY> Recently I needed to upgrade to newer kernel becouse of non LARTC
>AY> related issues. After installing 2.4.22 when the htb qdisc was attached
>AY> to the interface even without any rules, I was not able to send more
>AY> ~1mbit through the interface. After I reversed the htb3 patch and
>AY> rebuild with htb2 everything works as normal. Has anyone experienced the
>AY> same issue? thanks
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Anton Yurchenko<phila@dg.net.ua>
Digital Generation
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-09 8:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-08 13:49 [LARTC] htb v3 not as good as htb v2? Anton Yurchenko
2003-10-08 14:03 ` nuclearcat
2003-10-08 14:11 ` Lawrence MacIntyre
2003-10-08 16:56 ` Wilfried Weissmann
2003-10-09 8:44 ` Anton Yurchenko [this message]
2003-10-09 16:45 ` Stef Coene
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-lartc-106568935031045@msgid-missing \
--to=phila@dg.net.ua \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox