Re: [LARTC] htb v3 not as good as htb v2?

[Lawrence MacIntyre <lpz@ornl.gov>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 967 bytes --]

I've used HTB and CBQ to protect MPEG2 traffic streams from UDP traffic
over 100 Mb/s interfaces.  I have not yet attempted this with 1000 Mb/s
interfaces, but I hope to get to that this year (it it much more
difficult to measure accurately at this speed).

On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 09:49, Anton Yurchenko wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I`ve been using htb v2 for more then a year without any major problems. 
> Recently I needed to upgrade to newer kernel becouse of non LARTC 
> related issues. After installing 2.4.22 when the htb qdisc was attached 
> to the interface even without any rules, I was not able to send more 
> ~1mbit through the interface. After I reversed the htb3 patch and 
> rebuild with htb2 everything works as normal. Has anyone experienced the 
> same issue? thanks
-- 
    Lawrence MacIntyre     865.574.8696     lpz@ornl.gov
               Oak Ridge National Laboratory
High Performance Information Infrastructure Technology Group


[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]