[LARTC] priority of class

[LARTC] priority of class

[Gery Kahn]

I installed configuration:
qdisc cbq
class
qdisc cbq

and split traffic in 2 more classes
tc class add dev eth0 parent 2:0 classid 2:21 cbq avpkt 1000 bandwidth
100Mbit \
rate 70Mbit prio 3 maxburst 20

tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 2:21 tbf rate 70Mbit buffer 45Kb/8 limit 15Kb

tc class add dev eth0 parent 2:0 classid 2:22 cbq avpkt 1000 bandwidth
100Mbit \
rate 70Mbit prio 4 maxburst 20

tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 2:22 tbf rate 70Mbit buffer 45Kb/8 limit 15Kb

Actualy results is Ok.I am trying to see influence of "prio" parameter of
class
and nothing happened.
Please, help me w/ your answer.

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/2.4Routing/

[LARTC] priority of class

[Gery Kahn]

I understand that "prio" optiion in tc class is useless
when you add cbq cause here you specifying to which kind
of QDISC your class connected, so can be CBQ, PRIO and etc.
kinds.
Anybody agree w/ me?

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/2.4Routing/

Re: [LARTC] priority of class

[Wingtung.Leung]

On Thu, 7 Jun 2001, Gery Kahn wrote:

> I understand that "prio" optiion in tc class is useless
> when you add cbq cause here you specifying to which kind
> of QDISC your class connected, so can be CBQ, PRIO and etc.
> kinds.

I don't understand your three-line-long sentence.

Please clarify what the exact problem is and give an example where the
prio parameter would not have any effect. Don't add prio's before knowing
what you want.



_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/2.4Routing/