From: Tommy McCabe <rocketjet314@yahoo.com>
To: linux-8086@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Another patch
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 09:09:05 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040727160905.19326.qmail@web51305.mail.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040727151527.GC17232@duckman.distro.conectiva>
--- Eduardo Pereira Habkost
<ehabkost@conectiva.com.br> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 07:54:25AM -0600, Miguel
> Bolanos wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > On Mon, 2004-07-12 at 15:41, Tommy McCabe wrote:
> > > This patch:
> > >
> > > 1. Has eight partitions per hard disk instead of
> 64,
> > > to save indoes and not flood the disk images.
> This
> > > time I didn't change the commented-out stuff
> like the
> > > secondary IDE channel.
> >
> > I would like to hear out some votes about this
> before actually applying
> > it.. in my personal opinion it should go, but
> perhaps anyone have a
> > different opinion? (Allan? Harry? Claudio? ... ?)
>
> The patch breaks the major/minor numbers on MAKEDEV.
I don't know what a major-minor number is, but the
number I changed were arguments to MAKESET that said
how many devices to make. Besides, I tested it myself
and the hard disk drivers don't even notice.
> >
> > >
> > > 2. Remove the Conrad Parallel Port Radio Clock
> (which
> > > I think is some sort of easter egg) from
> MAKEDEV.
> > >
> >
> > sort of an easter egg... interesting definition.
> > Honestly i can't just a feature with that
> justification.
>
> I agree. We can comment it, as the device is not
> used. Our problem is
> that MAKEDEV makes too many devices by default and
> waste inodes on
> the root disk. Comment out devices that are not
> obviously used, can
> help. Maybe we can have a "--few-inodes" option or
> something like that,
> for building the root disks.
>
> >
> > > 3. Fixed the "make clean" process.
> > >
> >
> > Applied the rootfs_template.tar fix.
>
> Did you removed the warnings? The warning is there
> to tell the user that
> make clean is a little broken (it doesn't restore
> the previous state of
> rootfs_template), so we need to fix that, not remove
> the warning.
The patched Makefile doesn't alter rootfs_template at
all during make clean; but unless someone deliberately
modified what was in there it wouldn't be altered in
the first place.
> >
> > > 4. Got rid of the sudos in the Makefile.
> > >
> >
> > Definitly applied, BUT.. keeping the mount
> commands.
>
> Of course.
>
> >
> > > 5. Got rid of the ridiculous business with a
> ROOTDIR
> > > that didn't exist and commands that weren't
> referenced
> > > anywhere in the Makefile.
> > >
>
> Huh? I didn't get your point, Tommy. Please detail
> your changes, and
> explain the real reason, not just because you think
> it looks better,
> or it is "ridiculous".
The lines between 90-107 of the Makefile reference
commands that are not used anywhere else, and thus are
useless. They do, however, reference the variable
ROOTDIR, which is defined in Make.rules as a directory
that doesn't exist. So, I got rid of ROOTDIR and the
commands which aren't used.
> >
> > NOT applied.
> >
> > best wishes
> >
> > Mike
> >
>
> --
> Eduardo
>
> ATTACHMENT part 2 application/pgp-signature
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail is new and improved - Check it out!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-27 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-12 21:41 Another patch Tommy McCabe
2004-07-27 13:54 ` Miguel Bolanos
2004-07-27 15:15 ` Eduardo Pereira Habkost
2004-07-27 16:09 ` Tommy McCabe [this message]
[not found] <40F3C561.2080704@xs4all.nl>
2004-07-13 12:06 ` Tommy McCabe
2004-07-27 13:54 ` Miguel Bolanos
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040727160905.19326.qmail@web51305.mail.yahoo.com \
--to=rocketjet314@yahoo.com \
--cc=linux-8086@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox