From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: "Zheng, Lv" <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Cc: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: remove "config ACPI_DEBUG_FUNC_TRACE"
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2013 10:48:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1425689.yaSMfvQtv5@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1AE640813FDE7649BE1B193DEA596E88015CDB97@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On Sunday, April 07, 2013 07:00:34 AM Zheng, Lv wrote:
> > > > Kconfig symbol ACPI_DEBUG_FUNC_TRACE was only used (through its
> > > > corresponding macro) in drivers/acpi/acpica/acmacros.h. That macro
> > > > was removed from that header in v3.8, with commit
> > > > 86ff0e508f88eda6e479a897476026055831d2d8 ("ACPICA: Fix unmerged
> > > > acmacros.h divergences."). That commit did not explain why that
> > > > macro was removed. But it seems that ACPI_DEBUG_FUNC_TRACE can
> > now
> > > > be removed too, as it is unused.
> > >
> > > Lv, can you please comment here?
> >
> > Sorry for the delayed reply.
> >
> > The commit should have done something that already have been done in the
> > ACPICA.
> > I'll take a look at this.
>
> The original commit deleted CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG_FUNC_TRACE from acmacros.h as it is in the __wrong__ place.
> CONFIG_xxx is linux specific codes thus should appear in OSL layer - aclinux.h.
> ACPICA specific codes should only use selective definitions in #ifdef ACPI_xxx style and such codes should be merged into ACPICA rather than being merged into Linux ACPI.
>
> Now we have two choices:
> Re-implement it in the aclinux.h using "ACPI_DEBUG_OUTPUT" defined/undefined or delete
> this kernel configuration item temporarily.
OK
I'll apply the Paul's patch then and we'll decide what to do with that config
option later.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-07 8:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-19 10:41 [PATCH] ACPI: remove "config ACPI_DEBUG_FUNC_TRACE" Paul Bolle
2013-03-26 13:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-04-04 21:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-04-07 1:02 ` Zheng, Lv
2013-04-07 7:00 ` Zheng, Lv
2013-04-07 8:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2013-04-07 7:07 ` Zheng, Lv
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1425689.yaSMfvQtv5@vostro.rjw.lan \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lv.zheng@intel.com \
--cc=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
--cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox