* Re: [PATCH] ACPI: Fix CMOS RTC Operation Region handler accesses to wrong address of value
[not found] <1409814819-30594-1-git-send-email-jlee@suse.com>
@ 2014-09-04 19:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-09-05 2:06 ` joeyli
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2014-09-04 19:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lee, Chun-Yi
Cc: Len Brown, linux-acpi, Lan Tianyu, Lee, Chun-Yi,
Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, September 04, 2014 03:13:39 PM Lee, Chun-Yi wrote:
> The value64 parameter is an u64 point that used to transfer the value
> for write to CMOS, or used to return the value that's read from CMOS.
>
> The value64 is an u64 point, so don't need get address again. It causes
> acpi_cmos_rtc_space_handler always return 0 to reader and didn't write
> expected value to CMOS.
Do we need this fix to go to -stable?
> Cc: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>
> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lee, Chun-Yi <jlee@suse.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/acpi_cmos_rtc.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_cmos_rtc.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_cmos_rtc.c
> index 2da8660..81dc750 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_cmos_rtc.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_cmos_rtc.c
> @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ acpi_cmos_rtc_space_handler(u32 function, acpi_physical_address address,
> void *handler_context, void *region_context)
> {
> int i;
> - u8 *value = (u8 *)&value64;
> + u8 *value = (u8 *)value64;
>
> if (address > 0xff || !value64)
> return AE_BAD_PARAMETER;
>
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ACPI: Fix CMOS RTC Operation Region handler accesses to wrong address of value
2014-09-04 19:46 ` [PATCH] ACPI: Fix CMOS RTC Operation Region handler accesses to wrong address of value Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2014-09-05 2:06 ` joeyli
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: joeyli @ 2014-09-05 2:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Lee, Chun-Yi, Len Brown, linux-acpi, Lan Tianyu,
Rafael J. Wysocki
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 09:46:30PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, September 04, 2014 03:13:39 PM Lee, Chun-Yi wrote:
> > The value64 parameter is an u64 point that used to transfer the value
> > for write to CMOS, or used to return the value that's read from CMOS.
> >
> > The value64 is an u64 point, so don't need get address again. It causes
> > acpi_cmos_rtc_space_handler always return 0 to reader and didn't write
> > expected value to CMOS.
>
> Do we need this fix to go to -stable?
>
Yes, this handler was added since v3.11 kernel. So, need go to -stable.
> > Cc: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>
> > Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Lee, Chun-Yi <jlee@suse.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/acpi/acpi_cmos_rtc.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_cmos_rtc.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_cmos_rtc.c
> > index 2da8660..81dc750 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_cmos_rtc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_cmos_rtc.c
> > @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ acpi_cmos_rtc_space_handler(u32 function, acpi_physical_address address,
> > void *handler_context, void *region_context)
> > {
> > int i;
> > - u8 *value = (u8 *)&value64;
> > + u8 *value = (u8 *)value64;
> >
> > if (address > 0xff || !value64)
> > return AE_BAD_PARAMETER;
> >
>
> --
> I speak only for myself.
> Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
Regards
Joey Lee
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-09-05 2:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <1409814819-30594-1-git-send-email-jlee@suse.com>
2014-09-04 19:46 ` [PATCH] ACPI: Fix CMOS RTC Operation Region handler accesses to wrong address of value Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-09-05 2:06 ` joeyli
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox