* [patch 0/2] x86, acpi_cpufreq: Make APERF MPERF read only in acpi_cpufreq
@ 2009-02-20 0:53 venkip
2009-02-20 0:53 ` [patch 1/2] x86, acpi_cpufreq: cleanup structure names related to aperf mperf venkip
2009-02-20 0:53 ` [patch 2/2] x86, acpi_cpufreq: do not clear aperf mperf MSR after read venkip
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: venkip @ 2009-02-20 0:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lenb; +Cc: linux-acpi, Venkatesh Pallipadi
--
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [patch 1/2] x86, acpi_cpufreq: cleanup structure names related to aperf mperf
2009-02-20 0:53 [patch 0/2] x86, acpi_cpufreq: Make APERF MPERF read only in acpi_cpufreq venkip
@ 2009-02-20 0:53 ` venkip
2009-03-17 6:02 ` Len Brown
2009-02-20 0:53 ` [patch 2/2] x86, acpi_cpufreq: do not clear aperf mperf MSR after read venkip
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: venkip @ 2009-02-20 0:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lenb; +Cc: linux-acpi, Venkatesh Pallipadi
[-- Attachment #1: rename_aperf_mperf.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3486 bytes --]
Change structure name to make the code look simpler. No functionality
change in this patch.
Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 44 ++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c 2009-02-04 16:03:20.000000000 -0800
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c 2009-02-04 16:05:42.000000000 -0800
@@ -238,24 +238,24 @@ static u32 get_cur_val(const struct cpum
return cmd.val;
}
-struct perf_cur {
+struct perf_pair {
union {
struct {
u32 lo;
u32 hi;
} split;
u64 whole;
- } aperf_cur, mperf_cur;
+ } aperf, mperf;
};
/* Called via smp_call_function_single(), on the target CPU */
static void read_measured_perf_ctrs(void *_cur)
{
- struct perf_cur *cur = _cur;
+ struct perf_pair *cur = _cur;
- rdmsr(MSR_IA32_APERF, cur->aperf_cur.split.lo, cur->aperf_cur.split.hi);
- rdmsr(MSR_IA32_MPERF, cur->mperf_cur.split.lo, cur->mperf_cur.split.hi);
+ rdmsr(MSR_IA32_APERF, cur->aperf.split.lo, cur->aperf.split.hi);
+ rdmsr(MSR_IA32_MPERF, cur->mperf.split.lo, cur->mperf.split.hi);
wrmsr(MSR_IA32_APERF, 0, 0);
wrmsr(MSR_IA32_MPERF, 0, 0);
@@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ static void read_measured_perf_ctrs(void
static unsigned int get_measured_perf(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int cpu)
{
- struct perf_cur cur;
+ struct perf_pair cur;
unsigned int perf_percent;
unsigned int retval;
@@ -290,39 +290,39 @@ static unsigned int get_measured_perf(st
* Get an approximate value. Return failure in case we cannot get
* an approximate value.
*/
- if (unlikely(cur.aperf_cur.split.hi || cur.mperf_cur.split.hi)) {
+ if (unlikely(cur.aperf.split.hi || cur.mperf.split.hi)) {
int shift_count;
u32 h;
- h = max_t(u32, cur.aperf_cur.split.hi, cur.mperf_cur.split.hi);
+ h = max_t(u32, cur.aperf.split.hi, cur.mperf.split.hi);
shift_count = fls(h);
- cur.aperf_cur.whole >>= shift_count;
- cur.mperf_cur.whole >>= shift_count;
+ cur.aperf.whole >>= shift_count;
+ cur.mperf.whole >>= shift_count;
}
- if (((unsigned long)(-1) / 100) < cur.aperf_cur.split.lo) {
+ if (((unsigned long)(-1) / 100) < cur.aperf.split.lo) {
int shift_count = 7;
- cur.aperf_cur.split.lo >>= shift_count;
- cur.mperf_cur.split.lo >>= shift_count;
+ cur.aperf.split.lo >>= shift_count;
+ cur.mperf.split.lo >>= shift_count;
}
- if (cur.aperf_cur.split.lo && cur.mperf_cur.split.lo)
- perf_percent = (cur.aperf_cur.split.lo * 100) /
- cur.mperf_cur.split.lo;
+ if (cur.aperf.split.lo && cur.mperf.split.lo)
+ perf_percent = (cur.aperf.split.lo * 100) /
+ cur.mperf.split.lo;
else
perf_percent = 0;
#else
- if (unlikely(((unsigned long)(-1) / 100) < cur.aperf_cur.whole)) {
+ if (unlikely(((unsigned long)(-1) / 100) < cur.aperf.whole)) {
int shift_count = 7;
- cur.aperf_cur.whole >>= shift_count;
- cur.mperf_cur.whole >>= shift_count;
+ cur.aperf.whole >>= shift_count;
+ cur.mperf.whole >>= shift_count;
}
- if (cur.aperf_cur.whole && cur.mperf_cur.whole)
- perf_percent = (cur.aperf_cur.whole * 100) /
- cur.mperf_cur.whole;
+ if (cur.aperf.whole && cur.mperf.whole)
+ perf_percent = (cur.aperf.whole * 100) /
+ cur.mperf.whole;
else
perf_percent = 0;
--
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [patch 2/2] x86, acpi_cpufreq: do not clear aperf mperf MSR after read
2009-02-20 0:53 [patch 0/2] x86, acpi_cpufreq: Make APERF MPERF read only in acpi_cpufreq venkip
2009-02-20 0:53 ` [patch 1/2] x86, acpi_cpufreq: cleanup structure names related to aperf mperf venkip
@ 2009-02-20 0:53 ` venkip
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: venkip @ 2009-02-20 0:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lenb; +Cc: linux-acpi, Venkatesh Pallipadi
[-- Attachment #1: disable_aperf_mperf_writes_2629.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1925 bytes --]
Not write zeroes to APERF and MPERF by ondemand governor. With this other
users can share these MSRs during reads.
Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c 2009-02-04 16:05:42.000000000 -0800
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c 2009-02-04 16:08:51.000000000 -0800
@@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ struct acpi_cpufreq_data {
unsigned int max_freq;
unsigned int resume;
unsigned int cpu_feature;
+ u64 saved_aperf, saved_mperf;
};
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct acpi_cpufreq_data *, drv_data);
@@ -256,9 +257,6 @@ static void read_measured_perf_ctrs(void
rdmsr(MSR_IA32_APERF, cur->aperf.split.lo, cur->aperf.split.hi);
rdmsr(MSR_IA32_MPERF, cur->mperf.split.lo, cur->mperf.split.hi);
-
- wrmsr(MSR_IA32_APERF, 0, 0);
- wrmsr(MSR_IA32_MPERF, 0, 0);
}
/*
@@ -277,13 +275,20 @@ static void read_measured_perf_ctrs(void
static unsigned int get_measured_perf(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int cpu)
{
- struct perf_pair cur;
+ struct perf_pair readin, cur;
unsigned int perf_percent;
unsigned int retval;
- if (smp_call_function_single(cpu, read_measured_perf_ctrs, &cur, 1))
+ if (smp_call_function_single(cpu, read_measured_perf_ctrs, &readin, 1))
return 0;
+ cur.aperf.whole = readin.aperf.whole -
+ per_cpu(drv_data, cpu)->saved_aperf;
+ cur.mperf.whole = readin.mperf.whole -
+ per_cpu(drv_data, cpu)->saved_mperf;
+ per_cpu(drv_data, cpu)->saved_aperf = readin.aperf.whole;
+ per_cpu(drv_data, cpu)->saved_mperf = readin.mperf.whole;
+
#ifdef __i386__
/*
* We dont want to do 64 bit divide with 32 bit kernel
--
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch 1/2] x86, acpi_cpufreq: cleanup structure names related to aperf mperf
2009-02-20 0:53 ` [patch 1/2] x86, acpi_cpufreq: cleanup structure names related to aperf mperf venkip
@ 2009-03-17 6:02 ` Len Brown
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Len Brown @ 2009-03-17 6:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: venkip; +Cc: linux-acpi, Venkatesh Pallipadi
Venki,
Can you refresh these to apply to top of tree?
thanks,
Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-03-17 6:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-02-20 0:53 [patch 0/2] x86, acpi_cpufreq: Make APERF MPERF read only in acpi_cpufreq venkip
2009-02-20 0:53 ` [patch 1/2] x86, acpi_cpufreq: cleanup structure names related to aperf mperf venkip
2009-03-17 6:02 ` Len Brown
2009-02-20 0:53 ` [patch 2/2] x86, acpi_cpufreq: do not clear aperf mperf MSR after read venkip
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox