From: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
arekm@maven.pl, feng.tang@intel.com, flinco@libero.it,
mad_soft@inbox.ru, rjw@sisk.pl
Subject: Re: [patch 7/7] acpi: remove old blacklist entries
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 21:49:03 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1002161553420.3995@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100216154053.GA31195@srcf.ucam.org>
> > un-applied.
> >
> > Even if deleting the blacklist entries were correct,
> > which it more or less may be, the bug at hand is that
> > "acpi=ht" is now broken -- whether invoked via DMI
> > or cmdline; and this patch doesn't fix that.
>
> Indeed it doesn't. But the report also noted that the system worked fine
> with acpi=force, so this is something that we should clean up regardless
> of the original bug.
I fixed the acpi=ht option, and also removed the
system at hand from the blacklist. This is what
2.6.33 and 2.6.32.stable need.
In the future, I'll consider deleting the "acpi=ht"
option all together, and the blacklist with it,
but such changes are always harder than expected.
On a related topic, we should probably consider bringing
back the "noht" option. However we would do so by
checking the APIC-id topology rather than assuming
any consistency in how the BIOS enumerates the processors.
thanks,
-Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-17 2:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-02 22:37 [patch 7/7] acpi: remove old blacklist entries akpm
2010-02-03 23:04 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2010-02-16 7:53 ` Len Brown
2010-02-16 8:19 ` Len Brown
2010-02-16 15:40 ` Matthew Garrett
2010-02-17 2:49 ` Len Brown [this message]
2010-02-17 14:32 ` Matthew Garrett
2010-02-17 18:24 ` Len Brown
2010-02-17 18:31 ` Matthew Garrett
2010-02-17 19:43 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2010-02-17 21:23 ` Len Brown
2010-02-17 21:28 ` Matthew Garrett
2010-02-19 5:44 ` Len Brown
2010-02-19 5:53 ` [PATCH 1/2] ACPI: remove "acpi=ht" DMI blacklist Len Brown
2010-02-19 5:55 ` [patch 2/2] ACPI: delete the "acpi=ht" boot option Len Brown
2010-02-23 11:11 ` [patch 7/7] acpi: remove old blacklist entries Thomas Renninger
2010-03-14 20:35 ` Len Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.1002161553420.3995@localhost.localdomain \
--to=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arekm@maven.pl \
--cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
--cc=flinco@libero.it \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mad_soft@inbox.ru \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox