From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
To: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] lib/test_bits.c: Add tests for GENMASK_U128()
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 09:41:19 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d94c44df-055b-4fd1-a384-28ce5ce59921@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zqku82z-y2fjtIZT@yury-ThinkPad>
On 7/30/24 23:50, Yury Norov wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 11:18:08AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> This adds GENMASK_U128() tests although currently only 64 bit wide masks
>> are being tested.
>>
>> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
>> ---
>> lib/test_bits.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/test_bits.c b/lib/test_bits.c
>> index 01313980f175..f0d1033cf3c9 100644
>> --- a/lib/test_bits.c
>> +++ b/lib/test_bits.c
>> @@ -39,6 +39,26 @@ static void genmask_ull_test(struct kunit *test)
>> #endif
>> }
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_INT128
>
> Can you move this ifdefery inside the function scope, so that you'll
> not have do it below in tests array declarattion?
Sure, will fold in the following changes in here.
diff --git a/lib/test_bits.c b/lib/test_bits.c
index f0d1033cf3c9..f8b058974d07 100644
--- a/lib/test_bits.c
+++ b/lib/test_bits.c
@@ -39,9 +39,9 @@ static void genmask_ull_test(struct kunit *test)
#endif
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_INT128
static void genmask_u128_test(struct kunit *test)
{
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_INT128
/* Tests mask generation only when the mask width is within 64 bits */
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0x0000000000ff0000ULL, GENMASK_U128(87, 80) >> 64);
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0x0000000000ffffffULL, GENMASK_U128(87, 64) >> 64);
@@ -56,8 +56,8 @@ static void genmask_u128_test(struct kunit *test)
GENMASK_U128(0, 10);
GENMASK_U128(9, 10);
#endif
-}
#endif
+}
static void genmask_input_check_test(struct kunit *test)
{
@@ -84,9 +84,7 @@ static void genmask_input_check_test(struct kunit *test)
static struct kunit_case bits_test_cases[] = {
KUNIT_CASE(genmask_test),
KUNIT_CASE(genmask_ull_test),
-#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_INT128
KUNIT_CASE(genmask_u128_test),
-#endif
KUNIT_CASE(genmask_input_check_test),
{}
};
>
>> +static void genmask_u128_test(struct kunit *test)
>> +{
>> + /* Tests mask generation only when the mask width is within 64 bits */
>> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0x0000000000ff0000ULL, GENMASK_U128(87, 80) >> 64);
>> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0x0000000000ffffffULL, GENMASK_U128(87, 64) >> 64);
>> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0x0000000000000001ULL, GENMASK_U128(0, 0));
>> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0xffffffffffffffffULL, GENMASK_U128(63, 0));
>> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0xffffffffffffffffULL, GENMASK_U128(64, 0) >> 1);
>> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0x00000000ffffffffULL, GENMASK_U128(81, 50) >> 50);
>> +
>> +#ifdef TEST_GENMASK_FAILURES
>> + /* these should fail compilation */
>> + GENMASK_U128(0, 1);
>> + GENMASK_U128(0, 10);
>> + GENMASK_U128(9, 10);
>> +#endif
>> +}
>> +#endif
>> +
>> static void genmask_input_check_test(struct kunit *test)
>> {
>> unsigned int x, y;
>> @@ -56,12 +76,17 @@ static void genmask_input_check_test(struct kunit *test)
>> /* Valid input */
>> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, GENMASK_INPUT_CHECK(1, 1));
>> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, GENMASK_INPUT_CHECK(39, 21));
>> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, GENMASK_INPUT_CHECK(100, 80));
>> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, GENMASK_INPUT_CHECK(110, 65));
>> }
>>
>>
>> static struct kunit_case bits_test_cases[] = {
>> KUNIT_CASE(genmask_test),
>> KUNIT_CASE(genmask_ull_test),
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_INT128
>> + KUNIT_CASE(genmask_u128_test),
>> +#endif
>> KUNIT_CASE(genmask_input_check_test),
>> {}
>> };
>> --
>> 2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-31 4:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-25 5:48 [PATCH V2 0/2] uapi: Add support for GENMASK_U128() Anshuman Khandual
2024-07-25 5:48 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] uapi: Define GENMASK_U128 Anshuman Khandual
2024-07-30 18:15 ` Yury Norov
2024-07-31 3:44 ` Anshuman Khandual
2024-07-31 16:38 ` Yury Norov
2024-07-31 17:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-07-25 5:48 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] lib/test_bits.c: Add tests for GENMASK_U128() Anshuman Khandual
2024-07-30 18:20 ` Yury Norov
2024-07-31 4:11 ` Anshuman Khandual [this message]
2024-07-25 21:05 ` [PATCH V2 0/2] uapi: Add support " Andrew Morton
2024-07-26 3:34 ` Anshuman Khandual
2024-07-30 4:29 ` Anshuman Khandual
2024-07-30 12:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-07-31 2:39 ` Anshuman Khandual
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d94c44df-055b-4fd1-a384-28ce5ce59921@arm.com \
--to=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox