public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>
To: <sboyd@kernel.org>, <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	<linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	SoC Team <soc@kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>,
	Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>,
	<oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev>, <llvm@lists.linux.dev>,
	kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: microchip: clk for 6.18 #1
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 15:19:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0695ca65-536c-48d9-ad1b-49452e67a6f9@microchip.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250916080545.9310-1-nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>

On 16/09/2025 at 10:05, nicolas.ferre@microchip.com wrote:
> From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>
> 
> Dear clock maintainers,
> 
> Here are the first clk changes for 6.18.
> I don't think they have conflict with changes for the deprecated round_rate()
> to determine_rate() topic.
> They are in linux-next for a couple of days.

But... this series depends on this patch:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250827145427.46819-4-nicolas.ferre@microchip.com

Which will be part of a pull-request to-be-sent soon to arm-soc (which 
is part of linux-next, so the build error doesn't appear there).

Once the pull-request is done, do you prefer that I do an immutable 
branch between CLK and ARM, that I queue this at91 PM patch into the clk 
pull-request or that everything goes through arm-soc?

Thanks to the kbuild test bot.
Regards,
   Nicolas

> Please pull. Thanks, best regards,
>    Nicolas
> 
> The following changes since commit 8f5ae30d69d7543eee0d70083daf4de8fe15d585:
> 
>    Linux 6.17-rc1 (2025-08-10 19:41:16 +0300)
> 
> are available in the Git repository at:
> 
>    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/at91/linux.git tags/clk-microchip-6.18
> 
> for you to fetch changes up to e3130c2a9a0c8e549e044e659be6f762a1b1f725:
> 
>    ARM: at91: remove default values for PMC_PLL_ACR (2025-09-15 16:24:25 +0200)
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Microchip clock updates for v6.18
> 
> This update includes:
> - add one clock for sam9x75
> - new meaning for MCR register field in clk-master
> - use force-write to PLL update register to ensure
>    reliable programming sequence
> - update Analog Control Register (ACR) management to accommodate
>    differences across SoCs
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Balamanikandan Gunasundar (1):
>        clk: at91: sam9x7: Add peripheral clock id for pmecc
> 
> Cristian Birsan (2):
>        clk: at91: add ACR in all PLL settings
>        ARM: at91: remove default values for PMC_PLL_ACR
> 
> Nicolas Ferre (1):
>        clk: at91: clk-sam9x60-pll: force write to PLL_UPDT register
> 
> Ryan Wanner (1):
>        clk: at91: clk-master: Add check for divide by 3
> 
>   drivers/clk/at91/clk-master.c      |  3 ++
>   drivers/clk/at91/clk-sam9x60-pll.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++------------------
>   drivers/clk/at91/pmc.h             |  1 +
>   drivers/clk/at91/sam9x60.c         |  2 +
>   drivers/clk/at91/sam9x7.c          |  6 +++
>   drivers/clk/at91/sama7d65.c        |  4 ++
>   drivers/clk/at91/sama7g5.c         |  2 +
>   include/linux/clk/at91_pmc.h       |  2 -
>   8 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-16 13:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-16  8:05 [GIT PULL] ARM: microchip: clk for 6.18 #1 nicolas.ferre
2025-09-16 13:19 ` Nicolas Ferre [this message]
2025-09-17  4:49   ` Stephen Boyd
2025-09-17 18:23     ` Nicolas Ferre
2025-09-17 18:21 ` [GIT PULL v2] " nicolas.ferre
2025-09-21 17:02   ` Stephen Boyd

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0695ca65-536c-48d9-ad1b-49452e67a6f9@microchip.com \
    --to=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev \
    --cc=conor@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=soc@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox