Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: microchip: clk for 6.18 #1

[Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>]

Quoting Nicolas Ferre (2025-09-16 06:19:11)
> On 16/09/2025 at 10:05, nicolas.ferre@microchip.com wrote:
> > From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>
> > 
> > Dear clock maintainers,
> > 
> > Here are the first clk changes for 6.18.
> > I don't think they have conflict with changes for the deprecated round_rate()
> > to determine_rate() topic.
> > They are in linux-next for a couple of days.
> 
> But... this series depends on this patch:
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250827145427.46819-4-nicolas.ferre@microchip.com
> 
> Which will be part of a pull-request to-be-sent soon to arm-soc (which 
> is part of linux-next, so the build error doesn't appear there).
> 
> Once the pull-request is done, do you prefer that I do an immutable 
> branch between CLK and ARM, that I queue this at91 PM patch into the clk 
> pull-request or that everything goes through arm-soc?

Whatever is required to build the code should be included in the PR. If
the same commit goes into arm-soc tree that's OK, just make sure the
branches aren't broken if you checkout a commit anywhere along the
branch that is sent to clk or arm-soc trees. Broken includes
functionally broken.