Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: microchip: clk for 6.18 #1

[Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>]

Stephen,

On 17/09/2025 at 06:49, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Nicolas Ferre (2025-09-16 06:19:11)
>> On 16/09/2025 at 10:05, nicolas.ferre@microchip.com wrote:
>>> From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>
>>>
>>> Dear clock maintainers,
>>>
>>> Here are the first clk changes for 6.18.
>>> I don't think they have conflict with changes for the deprecated round_rate()
>>> to determine_rate() topic.
>>> They are in linux-next for a couple of days.
>>
>> But... this series depends on this patch:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250827145427.46819-4-nicolas.ferre@microchip.com
>>
>> Which will be part of a pull-request to-be-sent soon to arm-soc (which
>> is part of linux-next, so the build error doesn't appear there).
>>
>> Once the pull-request is done, do you prefer that I do an immutable
>> branch between CLK and ARM, that I queue this at91 PM patch into the clk
>> pull-request or that everything goes through arm-soc?
> 
> Whatever is required to build the code should be included in the PR. If
> the same commit goes into arm-soc tree that's OK, just make sure the
> branches aren't broken if you checkout a commit anywhere along the
> branch that is sent to clk or arm-soc trees. Broken includes
> functionally broken.

Thanks for your quick response Stephen. v2 of the pull-request has just 
been sent.

Best regards,
   Nicolas