* [PATCH -next] IIO: ADC: fix return value check in stm32_dfsdm_adc_probe()
@ 2018-01-11 11:12 Wei Yongjun
2018-01-11 21:28 ` Dan Carpenter
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Wei Yongjun @ 2018-01-11 11:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
In case of error, the function devm_iio_device_alloc() returns NULL
pointer not ERR_PTR(). The IS_ERR() test in the return value check
should be replaced with NULL test.
Fixes: e2e6771c6462 ("IIO: ADC: add STM32 DFSDM sigma delta ADC support")
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
---
drivers/iio/adc/stm32-dfsdm-adc.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-dfsdm-adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-dfsdm-adc.c
index e628d04..5e87140 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-dfsdm-adc.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-dfsdm-adc.c
@@ -1100,9 +1100,9 @@ static int stm32_dfsdm_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
dev_data = (const struct stm32_dfsdm_dev_data *)of_id->data;
iio = devm_iio_device_alloc(dev, sizeof(*adc));
- if (IS_ERR(iio)) {
+ if (!iio) {
dev_err(dev, "%s: Failed to allocate IIO\n", __func__);
- return PTR_ERR(iio);
+ return -ENOMEM;
}
adc = iio_priv(iio);
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* [PATCH -next] IIO: ADC: fix return value check in stm32_dfsdm_adc_probe()
2018-01-11 11:12 [PATCH -next] IIO: ADC: fix return value check in stm32_dfsdm_adc_probe() Wei Yongjun
@ 2018-01-11 21:28 ` Dan Carpenter
2018-01-12 1:37 ` weiyongjun (A)
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2018-01-11 21:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 11:12:41AM +0000, Wei Yongjun wrote:
> In case of error, the function devm_iio_device_alloc() returns NULL
> pointer not ERR_PTR(). The IS_ERR() test in the return value check
> should be replaced with NULL test.
>
> Fixes: e2e6771c6462 ("IIO: ADC: add STM32 DFSDM sigma delta ADC support")
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/iio/adc/stm32-dfsdm-adc.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-dfsdm-adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-dfsdm-adc.c
> index e628d04..5e87140 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-dfsdm-adc.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-dfsdm-adc.c
> @@ -1100,9 +1100,9 @@ static int stm32_dfsdm_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> dev_data = (const struct stm32_dfsdm_dev_data *)of_id->data;
>
> iio = devm_iio_device_alloc(dev, sizeof(*adc));
> - if (IS_ERR(iio)) {
> + if (!iio) {
> dev_err(dev, "%s: Failed to allocate IIO\n", __func__);
> - return PTR_ERR(iio);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> }
>
> adc = iio_priv(iio);
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This one doesn't return an error pointer either. The check causes a
static check warning for me. (It can't actually fail, though so maybe
it will return an error pointer in the future?)
regards,
dan carpenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* [PATCH -next] IIO: ADC: fix return value check in stm32_dfsdm_adc_probe()
2018-01-11 21:28 ` Dan Carpenter
@ 2018-01-12 1:37 ` weiyongjun (A)
2018-01-12 9:37 ` Arnaud Pouliquen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: weiyongjun (A) @ 2018-01-12 1:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
>
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 11:12:41AM +0000, Wei Yongjun wrote:
> > In case of error, the function devm_iio_device_alloc() returns NULL
> > pointer not ERR_PTR(). The IS_ERR() test in the return value check
> > should be replaced with NULL test.
> >
> > Fixes: e2e6771c6462 ("IIO: ADC: add STM32 DFSDM sigma delta ADC
> support")
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/iio/adc/stm32-dfsdm-adc.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-dfsdm-adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-
> dfsdm-adc.c
> > index e628d04..5e87140 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-dfsdm-adc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-dfsdm-adc.c
> > @@ -1100,9 +1100,9 @@ static int stm32_dfsdm_adc_probe(struct
> platform_device *pdev)
> > dev_data = (const struct stm32_dfsdm_dev_data *)of_id->data;
> >
> > iio = devm_iio_device_alloc(dev, sizeof(*adc));
> > - if (IS_ERR(iio)) {
> > + if (!iio) {
> > dev_err(dev, "%s: Failed to allocate IIO\n", __func__);
> > - return PTR_ERR(iio);
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > }
> >
> > adc = iio_priv(iio);
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> This one doesn't return an error pointer either. The check causes a
> static check warning for me. (It can't actually fail, though so maybe
> it will return an error pointer in the future?)
It seems that we can simply remove the check since 'adc' can never
be an invalid address here.
Regards,
Yongjun Wei
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* [PATCH -next] IIO: ADC: fix return value check in stm32_dfsdm_adc_probe()
2018-01-12 1:37 ` weiyongjun (A)
@ 2018-01-12 9:37 ` Arnaud Pouliquen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Arnaud Pouliquen @ 2018-01-12 9:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 01/12/2018 02:37 AM, weiyongjun (A) wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 11:12:41AM +0000, Wei Yongjun wrote:
>>> In case of error, the function devm_iio_device_alloc() returns NULL
>>> pointer not ERR_PTR(). The IS_ERR() test in the return value check
>>> should be replaced with NULL test.
>>>
>>> Fixes: e2e6771c6462 ("IIO: ADC: add STM32 DFSDM sigma delta ADC
>> support")
>>> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/iio/adc/stm32-dfsdm-adc.c | 4 ++--
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-dfsdm-adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-
>> dfsdm-adc.c
>>> index e628d04..5e87140 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-dfsdm-adc.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-dfsdm-adc.c
>>> @@ -1100,9 +1100,9 @@ static int stm32_dfsdm_adc_probe(struct
>> platform_device *pdev)
>>> dev_data = (const struct stm32_dfsdm_dev_data *)of_id->data;
>>>
>>> iio = devm_iio_device_alloc(dev, sizeof(*adc));
>>> - if (IS_ERR(iio)) {
>>> + if (!iio) {
>>> dev_err(dev, "%s: Failed to allocate IIO\n", __func__);
>>> - return PTR_ERR(iio);
>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>> }
>>>
>>> adc = iio_priv(iio);
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> This one doesn't return an error pointer either. The check causes a
>> static check warning for me. (It can't actually fail, though so maybe
>> it will return an error pointer in the future?)
>
> It seems that we can simply remove the check since 'adc' can never
> be an invalid address here.
Agree, i'm preparing patches for all issue you highlight,
Thanks for all your remarks
Arnaud
>
> Regards,
> Yongjun Wei
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-01-12 9:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-01-11 11:12 [PATCH -next] IIO: ADC: fix return value check in stm32_dfsdm_adc_probe() Wei Yongjun
2018-01-11 21:28 ` Dan Carpenter
2018-01-12 1:37 ` weiyongjun (A)
2018-01-12 9:37 ` Arnaud Pouliquen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox