* [PATCH 1/7] cpufreq: ap806: fix possible object reference leak [not found] <1554082674-2049-1-git-send-email-wen.yang99@zte.com.cn> @ 2019-04-01 1:37 ` Wen Yang 2019-04-02 13:54 ` [1/7] cpufreq: ap806: Checking implementation of armada_8k_cpufreq_init() Markus Elfring ` (2 more replies) 2019-04-01 1:37 ` [PATCH 2/7] cpufreq: imx6q: " Wen Yang 1 sibling, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Wen Yang @ 2019-04-01 1:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel Cc: wang.yi59, Andrew Lunn, Jason Cooper, linux-pm, Viresh Kumar, Gregory Clement, Rafael J. Wysocki, Wen Yang, linux-arm-kernel, Sebastian Hesselbarth The call to of_find_compatible_node returns a node pointer with refcount incremented thus it must be explicitly decremented after the last usage. Detected by coccinelle with the following warnings: ./drivers/cpufreq/armada-8k-cpufreq.c:187:1-7: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 130, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./drivers/cpufreq/armada-8k-cpufreq.c:191:1-7: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 130, but without a corresponding object release within this function. Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wen.yang99@zte.com.cn> Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Cc: Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@bootlin.com> Cc: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --- drivers/cpufreq/armada-8k-cpufreq.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/armada-8k-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/armada-8k-cpufreq.c index b3f4bd6..988ebc3 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/armada-8k-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/armada-8k-cpufreq.c @@ -132,6 +132,7 @@ static int __init armada_8k_cpufreq_init(void) of_node_put(node); return -ENODEV; } + of_node_put(node); nb_cpus = num_possible_cpus(); freq_tables = kcalloc(nb_cpus, sizeof(*freq_tables), GFP_KERNEL); -- 2.9.5 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [1/7] cpufreq: ap806: Checking implementation of armada_8k_cpufreq_init() 2019-04-01 1:37 ` [PATCH 1/7] cpufreq: ap806: fix possible object reference leak Wen Yang @ 2019-04-02 13:54 ` Markus Elfring 2019-04-02 13:54 ` Markus Elfring 2019-04-08 10:21 ` [PATCH 1/7] cpufreq: ap806: fix possible object reference leak Viresh Kumar 2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Markus Elfring @ 2019-04-02 13:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Wen Yang, Gregory Clement, Viresh Kumar, kernel-janitors Cc: Yi Wang, Andrew Lunn, Jason Cooper, linux-pm, Rafael J. Wysocki, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, Sebastian Hesselbarth > @@ -132,6 +132,7 @@ static int __init armada_8k_cpufreq_init(void) > of_node_put(node); > return -ENODEV; > } > + of_node_put(node); > > nb_cpus = num_possible_cpus(); > freq_tables = kcalloc(nb_cpus, sizeof(*freq_tables), GFP_KERNEL); Would another null pointer check be safer for this memory allocation? https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/drivers/cpufreq/armada-8k-cpufreq.c?id=05d08e2995cbe6efdb993482ee0d38a77040861a#n137 Regards, Markus _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [1/7] cpufreq: ap806: Checking implementation of armada_8k_cpufreq_init() 2019-04-01 1:37 ` [PATCH 1/7] cpufreq: ap806: fix possible object reference leak Wen Yang 2019-04-02 13:54 ` [1/7] cpufreq: ap806: Checking implementation of armada_8k_cpufreq_init() Markus Elfring @ 2019-04-02 13:54 ` Markus Elfring 2019-04-08 10:21 ` [PATCH 1/7] cpufreq: ap806: fix possible object reference leak Viresh Kumar 2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Markus Elfring @ 2019-04-02 13:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Wen Yang, Gregory Clement, Viresh Kumar, kernel-janitors Cc: Yi Wang, Andrew Lunn, Jason Cooper, linux-pm, Rafael J. Wysocki, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, Sebastian Hesselbarth > @@ -132,6 +132,7 @@ static int __init armada_8k_cpufreq_init(void) > of_node_put(node); > return -ENODEV; > } > + of_node_put(node); > > nb_cpus = num_possible_cpus(); > freq_tables = kcalloc(nb_cpus, sizeof(*freq_tables), GFP_KERNEL); Would another null pointer check be safer for this memory allocation? https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/drivers/cpufreq/armada-8k-cpufreq.c?id=05d08e2995cbe6efdb993482ee0d38a77040861a#n137 Regards, Markus _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/7] cpufreq: ap806: fix possible object reference leak 2019-04-01 1:37 ` [PATCH 1/7] cpufreq: ap806: fix possible object reference leak Wen Yang 2019-04-02 13:54 ` [1/7] cpufreq: ap806: Checking implementation of armada_8k_cpufreq_init() Markus Elfring 2019-04-02 13:54 ` Markus Elfring @ 2019-04-08 10:21 ` Viresh Kumar 2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Viresh Kumar @ 2019-04-08 10:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Wen Yang Cc: wang.yi59, Andrew Lunn, Jason Cooper, linux-pm, Gregory Clement, Rafael J. Wysocki, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, Sebastian Hesselbarth On 01-04-19, 09:37, Wen Yang wrote: > The call to of_find_compatible_node returns a node pointer with refcount > incremented thus it must be explicitly decremented after the last > usage. > > Detected by coccinelle with the following warnings: > ./drivers/cpufreq/armada-8k-cpufreq.c:187:1-7: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 130, but without a corresponding object release within this function. > ./drivers/cpufreq/armada-8k-cpufreq.c:191:1-7: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 130, but without a corresponding object release within this function. > > Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wen.yang99@zte.com.cn> > Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> > Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> > Cc: Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@bootlin.com> > Cc: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> > Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > --- > drivers/cpufreq/armada-8k-cpufreq.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) I haven't received the cover-letter and patch 4/7 (because the tags in that commit were incorrect). I have applied all the 7 patches to my cpufreq tree though. Thanks. -- viresh _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/7] cpufreq: imx6q: fix possible object reference leak [not found] <1554082674-2049-1-git-send-email-wen.yang99@zte.com.cn> 2019-04-01 1:37 ` [PATCH 1/7] cpufreq: ap806: fix possible object reference leak Wen Yang @ 2019-04-01 1:37 ` Wen Yang 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Wen Yang @ 2019-04-01 1:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel Cc: wang.yi59, Fabio Estevam, linux-pm, Viresh Kumar, Sascha Hauer, Rafael J. Wysocki, NXP Linux Team, Pengutronix Kernel Team, Shawn Guo, Wen Yang, linux-arm-kernel The call to of_node_get returns a node pointer with refcount incremented thus it must be explicitly decremented after the last usage. Detected by coccinelle with the following warnings: ./drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c:391:4-10: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 348, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c:395:3-9: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 348, but without a corresponding object release within this function. Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wen.yang99@zte.com.cn> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org> Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> Cc: Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de> Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com> Cc: NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com> Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --- drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c index a4ff09f..3e17560 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c @@ -388,11 +388,11 @@ static int imx6q_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) ret = imx6ul_opp_check_speed_grading(cpu_dev); if (ret) { if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER) - return ret; + goto put_node; dev_err(cpu_dev, "failed to read ocotp: %d\n", ret); - return ret; + goto put_node; } } else { imx6q_opp_check_speed_grading(cpu_dev); -- 2.9.5 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-04-08 10:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <1554082674-2049-1-git-send-email-wen.yang99@zte.com.cn>
2019-04-01 1:37 ` [PATCH 1/7] cpufreq: ap806: fix possible object reference leak Wen Yang
2019-04-02 13:54 ` [1/7] cpufreq: ap806: Checking implementation of armada_8k_cpufreq_init() Markus Elfring
2019-04-02 13:54 ` Markus Elfring
2019-04-08 10:21 ` [PATCH 1/7] cpufreq: ap806: fix possible object reference leak Viresh Kumar
2019-04-01 1:37 ` [PATCH 2/7] cpufreq: imx6q: " Wen Yang
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox