From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>
To: "Thomas Weißschuh" <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@kernel.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@kernel.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "Russell King" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
"Madhavan Srinivasan" <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
"Michael Ellerman" <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
"Nicholas Piggin" <npiggin@gmail.com>,
"Christophe Leroy" <chleroy@kernel.org>,
"Thomas Bogendoerfer" <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
"Vincenzo Frascino" <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] x86/vdso: Respect COMPAT_32BIT_TIME
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2026 17:59:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15925544-1ae5-406a-b9cc-af5935cc9f02@app.fastmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260410091131-46b6354c-9d06-4e47-9345-ee224d8528f7@linutronix.de>
On Fri, Apr 10, 2026, at 09:24, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 03, 2026 at 09:50:33PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 3, 2026, at 19:11, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> >
>> > The time zone in the kernel has never worked anyway, as it would require the
>> > kernel to contain at least the forward portion of the zoneinfo/tzdata table in
>> > order to actually work correctly. The only plausible use of it would be for
>> > local time-based filesystems like FAT, but I don't think we bother.
>> >
>> > A bigger question is whether or not we should omit these from the vDSO
>> > completely (potentially causing link failures) or replace them with stubs
>> > returning -ENOSYS.
>>
>> I see no harm in keeping gettimeofday() in the vdso when
>> COMPAT_32BIT_TIME is turned on, as existing code will call it
>> no matter whether it's in the vdso or the syscall.
>
> We would still always keep them for 64-bit ABIs, right?
Yes, I think we can't easily change that now. It was probably
a mistake to keep them in the generic syscall table after
we dropped them for 32-bit non-time32 targets, so riscv64
and loongarch should have not had these in the first place.
>> Equally, I see no point in having either version of
>> gettimeofday() or settimeofday() when COMPAT_32BIT_TIME is
>> disabled, as clearly anything calling it would pass incorrect
>> data for times past 2038.
>
> Should we also drop the syscalls in these cases?
> We will need to keep settimeofday() in some form to support the
> timewarping call done by init.
>
> Recap/Proposal:
>
> * Keep the gettimeofday()/time() syscalls when they are y2038 safe or
> CONFIG_COMPAT_32BIT_TIME is set.
> * The vDSO functions always mirror the systemcall availability.
These sound good.
> * Always provide settimeofday(). If CONFIG_COMPAT_32BIT_TIME is *not*
> set, reject passing any 'tv' argument where it may not be y2038 safe.
This sounds wrong to me now: the case I'm worried about is a 32-bit
system calling settimeofday() based on the value of an RTC or NTP.
The idea of CONFIG_COMPAT_32BIT_TIME=n is to catch this by causing
an intentional ENOSYS error even for valid times, so it doesn't
suddenly start breaking in 2038.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-13 16:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-27 6:57 [PATCH 0/7] vDSO: Respect COMPAT_32BIT_TIME Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-27 6:57 ` [PATCH 1/7] x86/vdso: " Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-27 8:51 ` Arnd Bergmann
2026-02-27 8:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
2026-02-27 9:34 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-03-03 18:11 ` H. Peter Anvin
2026-03-03 20:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2026-03-03 21:00 ` H. Peter Anvin
2026-03-03 21:27 ` Arnd Bergmann
2026-03-03 21:36 ` H. Peter Anvin
2026-04-10 7:24 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-04-13 15:59 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2026-04-13 16:13 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-04-13 16:57 ` Arnd Bergmann
2026-04-14 10:16 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-03-04 7:35 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-03-04 18:30 ` H. Peter Anvin
2026-03-05 9:24 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-03-05 23:57 ` H. Peter Anvin
2026-03-06 9:42 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-03-06 20:52 ` H. Peter Anvin
2026-02-27 6:57 ` [PATCH 2/7] ARM: VDSO: " Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-27 6:57 ` [PATCH 3/7] arm64: vdso32: " Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-27 6:57 ` [PATCH 4/7] powerpc/vdso: " Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-27 6:57 ` [PATCH 5/7] MIPS: VDSO: Drop kconfig MIPS_CLOCK_VSYSCALL Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-27 8:46 ` Arnd Bergmann
2026-02-27 9:31 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-27 10:03 ` Arnd Bergmann
2026-02-27 10:17 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-27 6:57 ` [PATCH 6/7] MIPS: VDSO: Respect COMPAT_32BIT_TIME Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-27 6:57 ` [PATCH 7/7] vdso/gettimeofday: Verify COMPAT_32BIT_TIME interactions Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-27 8:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15925544-1ae5-406a-b9cc-af5935cc9f02@app.fastmail.com \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de \
--cc=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox