Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] Use definition for cmpxchg swi
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 17:30:40 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091109173040.GA24358@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0911090953010.16711@xanadu.home>

On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 09:56:26AM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Nov 2009, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 08:42:51PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > > On Sun, 8 Nov 2009, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Use a definition for the cmpxchg SWI instead of hard-coding the number.
> > > 
> > > Well...  Initially I didn't use a definition in unistd.h because I 
> > > didn't want user space to "see" it and assume this was part of the 
> > > kernel ABI since this is actually just an implementation detail that 
> > > depends on a particular kernel configuration.
> > 
> > The ifdef __KERNEL__ is sufficient for that - kernel headers are now
> > stripped of code within these defines during 'make installheaders'.
> 
> Sure. But I wouldn't be surprised to see people redefining it manually 
> just because they didn't understand why there was a #ifdef __KERNEL__ in 
> the kernel file.  Adding a comment makes the intent clearer.

One solution to that would be to make it a random number within a
certain range picked at kernel boot time. ;)

I'll add a comment then.

Note, however, that the original code was buggy - it resulted in
the '0xfff0' syscall being called instead of '0xffff0' - note the
extra 4 bits there.

  reply	other threads:[~2009-11-09 17:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-08 20:04 [PATCH] Use definition for cmpxchg swi Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-11-09  1:42 ` Nicolas Pitre
2009-11-09  8:51   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-11-09 14:56     ` Nicolas Pitre
2009-11-09 17:30       ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2009-11-09 19:08         ` Jamie Lokier
2009-11-09 19:14           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-11-09 19:31           ` Nicolas Pitre
2009-11-09 23:52             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-11-09 23:58               ` Nicolas Pitre

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091109173040.GA24358@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox