From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] efi/libstub/fdt: Standardize the names of EFI stub parameters
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 17:25:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150911162559.GA8726@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150911124643.GB4530@olila.local.net-space.pl>
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 01:46:43PM +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 05:23:02PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > > C) When you could go:
> > > >
> > > > DT -> Discover Xen -> Xen-specific stuff -> Xen-specific EFI/ACPI discovery
> > >
> > > I take you mean discovering Xen with the usual Xen hypervisor node on
> > > device tree. I think that C) is a good option actually. I like it. Not
> > > sure why we didn't think about this earlier. Is there anything EFI or
> > > ACPI which is needed before Xen support is discovered by
> > > arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c:setup_arch -> xen_early_init()?
> >
> > Currently lots (including the memory map). With the stuff to support
> > SPCR, the ACPI discovery would be moved before xen_early_init().
> >
> > > If not, we could just go for this. A lot of complexity would go away.
> >
> > I suspect this would still be fairly complex, but would at least prevent
> > the Xen-specific EFI handling from adversely affecting the native case.
> >
> > > > D) If you want to be generic:
> > > > EFI -> EFI application -> EFI tables -> ACPI tables -> Xen-specific stuff
> > > > \------------------------------------------/
> > > > (virtualize these, provide shims to Dom0, but handle
> > > > everything in Xen itself)
> > >
> > > I think that this is good in theory but could turn out to be a lot of
> > > work in practice. We could probably virtualize the RuntimeServices but
> > > the BootServices are troublesome.
> >
> > What's troublesome with the boot services?
> >
> > What can't be simulated?
>
> How do you want to access bare metal EFI boot services from dom0 if they
> were shutdown long time ago before loading dom0 image?
I don't want to.
I asked "What can't be simulated?" because I assumed everything
necessary/mandatory could be simulated without needinng access to any
real EFI boot services.
As far as I can see all that's necessary is to provide a compatible
interface.
> What do you need from EFI boot services in dom0?
The ability to call ExitBootServices() and SetVirtualAddressMap() on a
_virtual_ address map for _virtual_ services provided by the hypervisor.
A console so that I can log things early on.
Mark.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-11 16:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-10 8:41 [PATCH] efi/libstub/fdt: Standardize the names of EFI stub parameters Shannon Zhao
2015-09-10 9:52 ` Mark Rutland
2015-09-10 10:19 ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-09-10 11:24 ` Mark Rutland
2015-09-10 11:37 ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-09-10 12:15 ` Mark Rutland
2015-09-10 12:58 ` [Xen-devel] " Ian Campbell
2015-09-10 13:08 ` Jan Beulich
2015-09-10 13:30 ` Ian Campbell
2015-09-10 13:52 ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-09-10 14:13 ` Leif Lindholm
2015-09-10 14:49 ` Mark Rutland
2015-09-10 16:10 ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-09-10 16:23 ` Mark Rutland
2015-09-11 12:46 ` Daniel Kiper
2015-09-11 13:14 ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-09-11 13:30 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-09-11 15:45 ` Daniel Kiper
2015-09-14 8:42 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-09-14 9:09 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-09-14 9:31 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-09-14 9:36 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-09-14 10:39 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2015-09-14 11:16 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-09-14 11:34 ` Jan Beulich
2015-09-11 16:33 ` Mark Rutland
2015-09-11 16:25 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2015-09-12 11:36 ` Daniel Kiper
2015-09-14 9:25 ` Mark Rutland
2015-09-14 9:43 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-09-14 9:57 ` Ian Campbell
2015-09-14 10:02 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-09-14 10:25 ` Ian Campbell
2015-09-14 12:28 ` Daniel Kiper
2015-09-14 13:09 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-09-14 13:57 ` Daniel Kiper
2015-09-14 9:47 ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-09-14 12:19 ` Daniel Kiper
2015-09-11 11:00 ` Ian Campbell
2015-09-10 12:55 ` Jan Beulich
2015-09-10 14:53 ` Mark Rutland
2015-09-10 15:06 ` Jan Beulich
2015-09-11 16:36 ` Mark Rutland
2015-09-10 11:32 ` Andrew Turner
2015-09-10 11:48 ` Julien Grall
2015-09-10 12:05 ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-09-10 12:53 ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall
2015-09-17 11:43 ` Shannon Zhao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150911162559.GA8726@leverpostej \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox