[PATCH 3/5] cpufreq: dt: Add support for some new Allwinner SoCs

[PATCH 3/5] cpufreq: dt: Add support for some new Allwinner SoCs

[Icenowy Zheng]

Some new Allwinner SoCs get supported in the kernel after the
compatibles are added to cpufreq-dt-platdev driver.

Add their compatible strings in the cpufreq-dt-platdev driver.

Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.io>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c
index 921b4a6c3d16..2180e509e383 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c
@@ -24,7 +24,12 @@ static const struct of_device_id machines[] __initconst = {
 	{ .compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-a23", },
 	{ .compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-a33", },
 	{ .compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-a83t", },
+	{ .compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-h2-plus", },
 	{ .compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-h3", },
+	{ .compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-v3s", },
+	{ .compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-a64", },
+	{ .compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-h5", },
+	{ .compatible = "nextthing,gr8", },
 
 	{ .compatible = "apm,xgene-shadowcat", },
 
-- 
2.12.2

[PATCH 3/5] cpufreq: dt: Add support for some new Allwinner SoCs

[Viresh Kumar]

On Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 12:20 AM, Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.io> wrote:
> Some new Allwinner SoCs get supported in the kernel after the
> compatibles are added to cpufreq-dt-platdev driver.
>
> Add their compatible strings in the cpufreq-dt-platdev driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.io>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c
> index 921b4a6c3d16..2180e509e383 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c
> @@ -24,7 +24,12 @@ static const struct of_device_id machines[] __initconst = {
>         { .compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-a23", },
>         { .compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-a33", },
>         { .compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-a83t", },
> +       { .compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-h2-plus", },
>         { .compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-h3", },
> +       { .compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-v3s", },
> +       { .compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-a64", },
> +       { .compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-h5", },
> +       { .compatible = "nextthing,gr8", },


This needs to be in alphabetical order and please cc cpufreq
maintainers next time.

[PATCH 3/5] cpufreq: dt: Add support for some new Allwinner SoCs

[Viresh Kumar]

On 11-04-17, 15:18, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> 
> 2017?4?11? 15:03? Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>???
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 12:20 AM, Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.io> wrote: 
> > > Some new Allwinner SoCs get supported in the kernel after the 
> > > compatibles are added to cpufreq-dt-platdev driver. 
> > > 
> > > Add their compatible strings in the cpufreq-dt-platdev driver. 
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.io> 
> > > --- 
> > >? drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c | 5 +++++ 
> > >? 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) 
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c 
> > > index 921b4a6c3d16..2180e509e383 100644 
> > > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c 
> > > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c 
> > > @@ -24,7 +24,12 @@ static const struct of_device_id machines[] __initconst = { 
> > >???????? { .compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-a23", }, 
> > >???????? { .compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-a33", }, 
> > >???????? { .compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-a83t", }, 
> > > +?????? { .compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-h2-plus", }, 
> > >???????? { .compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-h3", }, 
> > > +?????? { .compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-v3s", }, 
> > > +?????? { .compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-a64", }, 
> > > +?????? { .compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-h5", }, 
> > > +?????? { .compatible = "nextthing,gr8", }, 
> >
> >
> > This needs to be in alphabetical order and please cc cpufreq 
> 
> However I prefer these sequence -- sun50i is later than sun8i.
> 
> Place sun50i between sun4i and sun5i is meaningless, as sun50i in fact have a deep relationship with sun8i, but not sun4/5i.

We aren't really worried about relationship here. The order is important to find
missing entries as soon as possible and that's why I have been forcing people to
add entries in alphabetical order.

-- 
viresh