From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] ARM: Inline locking functions for !PREEMPTION
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 00:04:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191015220420.lisfkqd4lfpiyd7h@flow> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a2hYteGizk=--_Z1kE200_ORL52QEK5RBTMtXt5_UzmhA@mail.gmail.com>
On 2019-10-14 09:43:53 [+0200], Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 12:14 AM Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
> <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> wrote:
> >
> > On non-preemptive kernels, the locking instruction is less than 64 bytes
> > and it makes sense to inline it. With PREEMPTION the kernel becomes very
> > big if the locks are inlined.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>
> > ---
>
> At the moment, we have two architectures selecting all 28 symbols
> and you are adding a third, all other architecture select none of them.
>
> This tells me that the configurability has gone a little overboard. How about
> adding a shortcut ARCH_INLINE_ALL_SPINLOCKS that selects the 28
> symbols and using that for arm/arm64/s390?
Sounds reasonable.
> Also, the output of 'size vmlinux' before and after the patch for
> multi_v7_defconfig would be useful to have in the changelog, as there
> are a couple of platforms that are particularly sensitive to object code
> size changes.
okay.
> Arnd
Sebastian
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-15 22:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-13 22:13 [RFC PATCH 0/6 v2] Queued spinlocks/RW-locks for ARM Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-10-13 22:13 ` [PATCH 1/6] sh: Move cmpxchg-xchg.h to asm-generic Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-10-14 7:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-10-15 22:31 ` [PATCH 1/6 v2] " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-10-13 22:13 ` [PATCH 2/6] ARM: cmpxchg: Define first cmpxchg() followed by xchg() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-10-13 22:13 ` [PATCH 3/6] ARM: Add xchg_{8|16}() on generic cmpxchg() on CPU_V6 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-10-13 22:13 ` [PATCH 4/6] ARM: Use qrwlock implementation Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-10-13 22:13 ` [PATCH 5/6] ARM: Use qspinlock implementation Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-10-13 22:13 ` [PATCH 6/6] ARM: Inline locking functions for !PREEMPTION Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-10-14 7:43 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-10-14 10:01 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-10-15 22:30 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-10-15 22:37 ` Waiman Long
2019-10-15 22:47 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-10-15 22:04 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2019-10-14 9:00 ` [RFC PATCH 0/6 v2] Queued spinlocks/RW-locks for ARM Arnd Bergmann
2019-10-16 15:57 ` Will Deacon
2019-10-16 17:45 ` Waiman Long
2019-10-16 18:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-10-16 21:35 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-10-16 22:09 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-10-17 15:36 ` Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191015220420.lisfkqd4lfpiyd7h@flow \
--to=sebastian@breakpoint.cc \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox