From: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
To: Manorit Chawdhry <m-chawdhry@ti.com>
Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
Tero Kristo <kristo@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Udit Kumar <u-kumar1@ti.com>,
Neha Malcom Francis <n-francis@ti.com>,
Aniket Limaye <a-limaye@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/9] arm64: dts: ti: Split k3-j784s4-j742s2-main-common.dtsi
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2024 08:20:54 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240807132054.jcz5fdokc5yk3mbo@entrust> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240731-b4-upstream-j742s2-v3-4-da7fe3aa9e90@ti.com>
On 22:40-20240731, Manorit Chawdhry wrote:
> k3-j784s4-j742s2-main-common.dtsi will be included in k3-j742s2-main.dtsi at a
> later point so move j784s4 related stuff to k3-j784s4-main.dtsi
>
> Signed-off-by: Manorit Chawdhry <m-chawdhry@ti.com>
> ---
> .../boot/dts/ti/k3-j784s4-j742s2-main-common.dtsi | 13 -------------
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j784s4-main.dtsi | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j784s4.dtsi | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j784s4-j742s2-main-common.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j784s4-j742s2-main-common.dtsi
> index 17abd0f1560a..91352b1f63d2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j784s4-j742s2-main-common.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j784s4-j742s2-main-common.dtsi
> @@ -2405,19 +2405,6 @@ c71_2: dsp@66800000 {
> status = "disabled";
> };
>
> - c71_3: dsp@67800000 {
> - compatible = "ti,j721s2-c71-dsp";
> - reg = <0x00 0x67800000 0x00 0x00080000>,
> - <0x00 0x67e00000 0x00 0x0000c000>;
> - reg-names = "l2sram", "l1dram";
> - ti,sci = <&sms>;
> - ti,sci-dev-id = <40>;
> - ti,sci-proc-ids = <0x33 0xff>;
> - resets = <&k3_reset 40 1>;
> - firmware-name = "j784s4-c71_3-fw";
> - status = "disabled";
> - };
> -
This patch can be squashed in.
> main_esm: esm@700000 {
> compatible = "ti,j721e-esm";
> reg = <0x00 0x700000 0x00 0x1000>;
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j784s4-main.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j784s4-main.dtsi
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..2ea470d1206d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j784s4-main.dtsi
> @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR MIT
> +/*
> + * Device Tree Source for J784S4 SoC Family Main Domain peripherals
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2022-2024 Texas Instruments Incorporated - https://www.ti.com/
> + */
> +
> +&cbass_main {
> + c71_3: dsp@67800000 {
> + compatible = "ti,j721s2-c71-dsp";
> + reg = <0x00 0x67800000 0x00 0x00080000>,
> + <0x00 0x67e00000 0x00 0x0000c000>;
> + reg-names = "l2sram", "l1dram";
> + ti,sci = <&sms>;
> + ti,sci-dev-id = <40>;
> + ti,sci-proc-ids = <0x33 0xff>;
> + resets = <&k3_reset 40 1>;
> + firmware-name = "j784s4-c71_3-fw";
> + status = "disabled";
> + };
> +};
I am looking at https://www.ti.com/lit/ug/spruje3/spruje3.pdf (page 26),
Device Comparison:
CPSW/Serdes, PCIE is also different? Was that missed?
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j784s4.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j784s4.dtsi
> index 16ade4fd9cbd..f5afa32157cb 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j784s4.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j784s4.dtsi
> @@ -168,3 +168,5 @@ cpu7: cpu@103 {
> };
> };
> };
> +
> +#include "k3-j784s4-main.dtsi"
>
> --
> 2.45.1
>
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-07 13:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-31 17:10 [PATCH v3 0/9] Introduce J742S2 SoC and EVM Manorit Chawdhry
2024-07-31 17:10 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] arm64: dts: ti: Move j784s4-{} include files to j784s4-j742s2-{}-common.dtsi Manorit Chawdhry
2024-07-31 17:10 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] arm64: dts: ti: Move k3-j784s4.dtsi to k3-j784s4-j742s2-common.dtsi Manorit Chawdhry
2024-07-31 17:10 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] arm64: dts: ti: Split k3-j784s4-j742s2-common.dtsi Manorit Chawdhry
2024-07-31 17:10 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] arm64: dts: ti: Split k3-j784s4-j742s2-main-common.dtsi Manorit Chawdhry
2024-08-07 13:09 ` Nishanth Menon
2024-08-07 13:20 ` Nishanth Menon [this message]
2024-08-08 4:52 ` Manorit Chawdhry
2024-08-08 5:28 ` Siddharth Vadapalli
2024-08-08 10:54 ` Nishanth Menon
2024-08-08 4:56 ` Manorit Chawdhry
2024-08-08 10:48 ` Nishanth Menon
2024-07-31 17:10 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] arm64: dts: ti: Move k3-j784s4-evm.dts to k3-j784s4-j742s2-evm-common.dtsi Manorit Chawdhry
2024-07-31 17:10 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] arm64: dts: ti: Split k3-j784s4-j742s2-evm-common.dtsi Manorit Chawdhry
2024-08-07 13:06 ` Nishanth Menon
2024-07-31 17:10 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] dt-bindings: arm: ti: Add bindings for J742S2 SoCs and Boards Manorit Chawdhry
2024-07-31 17:10 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] arm64: dts: ti: Introduce J742S2 SoC family Manorit Chawdhry
2024-07-31 17:10 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] arm64: dts: ti: Add support for J742S2 EVM board Manorit Chawdhry
2024-08-07 9:41 ` Beleswar Prasad Padhi
2024-08-07 11:51 ` Nishanth Menon
2024-08-07 12:06 ` Nishanth Menon
2024-08-07 13:25 ` [PATCH v3 0/9] Introduce J742S2 SoC and EVM Nishanth Menon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240807132054.jcz5fdokc5yk3mbo@entrust \
--to=nm@ti.com \
--cc=a-limaye@ti.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kristo@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m-chawdhry@ti.com \
--cc=n-francis@ti.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=u-kumar1@ti.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox