From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@ti.com>
Cc: lpieralisi@kernel.org, kw@linux.com, robh@kernel.org,
bhelgaas@google.com, manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org,
kishon@kernel.org, u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de,
cassel@kernel.org, dlemoal@kernel.org,
yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, srk@ti.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI: keystone: Set mode as RootComplex for "ti,keystone-pcie" compatible
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 09:49:45 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241106154945.GA1526156@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5983ad5e-729d-4cdc-bdb4-d60333410675@ti.com>
On Wed, Nov 06, 2024 at 11:36:38AM +0530, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 06:57:58PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 04:27:13PM +0530, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote:
> > > From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
> > >
> > > commit 23284ad677a9 ("PCI: keystone: Add support for PCIe EP in AM654x
> > > Platforms") introduced configuring "enum dw_pcie_device_mode" as part of
> > > device data ("struct ks_pcie_of_data"). However it failed to set mode
> > > for "ti,keystone-pcie" compatible. Set mode as RootComplex for
> > > "ti,keystone-pcie" compatible here.
> >
> > 23284ad677a9 appeared in v5.10.
> >
> > But I guess RC support has not been broken since v5.10 because we
> > never used ks_pcie_rc_of_data.mode anyway?
> >
> > It looks like the only use is here:
> >
> > #define DW_PCIE_VER_365A 0x3336352a
> > #define DW_PCIE_VER_480A 0x3438302a
> >
> > ks_pcie_probe
> > {
> > ...
> > mode = data->mode;
> > ...
> > if (dw_pcie_ver_is_ge(pci, 480A))
> > ret = ks_pcie_am654_set_mode(dev, mode);
> > else
> > ret = ks_pcie_set_mode(dev);
>
> "mode" is used later on during probe at:
>
> ....
> switch (mode) {
> case DW_PCIE_RC_TYPE:
> ...
> case DW_PCIE_EP_TYPE:
> ...
> default:
> dev_err(dev, "INVALID device type %d\n", mode);
> }
> ....
How did I miss that? :) It is literally two lines down.
> > so we don't even look at .mode unless the version is v4.80a or later,
> > and this is v3.65a?
> >
> > So this is basically a cosmetic fix (but still worth doing for
> > readability!) and doesn't need a stable backport, right?
>
> I suppose that "data->mode" will default to zero for v3.65a prior to
> this commit, corresponding to "DW_PCIE_UNKNOWN_TYPE" rather than the
> correct value of "DW_PCIE_RC_TYPE". Since I don't have an SoC with the
> v3.65a version of the controller, I cannot test it out, but I presume
> that the "INVALID device type 0" error will be displayed. Though the probe
> will not fail since the "default" case doesn't return an error code, the
> controller probably will not be functional as the configuration associated
> with the "DW_PCIE_RC_TYPE" case has been skipped. Hence, I believe that
> this fix should be backported.
I guess nobody really cares too much since it's been broken for almost
four years.
But indeed, sounds like it should have a stable tag and maybe a commit
log hint about what the failure looks like.
Thanks!
Bjorn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-06 15:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-24 10:57 [PATCH v2 0/2] Fixes for PCI Keystone driver Siddharth Vadapalli
2024-05-24 10:57 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI: keystone: Set mode as RootComplex for "ti,keystone-pcie" compatible Siddharth Vadapalli
2024-11-06 0:57 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-11-06 6:06 ` Siddharth Vadapalli
2024-11-06 15:49 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2024-11-06 16:05 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2024-11-07 4:39 ` Siddharth Vadapalli
2024-11-07 15:51 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2024-11-08 5:05 ` Siddharth Vadapalli
2024-05-24 10:57 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] PCI: keystone: Add link up check in ks_child_pcie_ops.map_bus() Siddharth Vadapalli
2024-11-03 21:05 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Fixes for PCI Keystone driver Krzysztof Wilczyński
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241106154945.GA1526156@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=kishon@kernel.org \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=s-vadapalli@ti.com \
--cc=srk@ti.com \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox