From: Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Andreas Grapentin <gra@linux.ibm.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Friedrich Welter <fritz@linux.ibm.com>,
Gautam Gala <ggala@linux.ibm.com>,
Hariharan Mari <hari55@linux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@linux.ibm.com>,
Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>,
Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <oss@nina.schoetterlglausch.eu>,
Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
Ulrich Weigand <Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 22/26] KVM: arm64: Refactor core reg handling
Date: Fri, 29 May 2026 17:55:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260529155601.2927240-23-seiden@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260529155601.2927240-1-seiden@linux.ibm.com>
Refactor sysreg core handling. Before this all core regs are identified
with a memory address and reading/writing happened through accessing the
data at this address. However, for arm64 on s390 not all core registers
have a dedicated memory address.
Refactor such that the address function does not return an address but
actually does the read/write request. ELR_EL1 and SPSR_EL1 now use
vcpu_read_sys_reg/vcpu_write_sys_reg accessor functions, allowing s390
to provide custom implementations.
Co-developed-by: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>
---
virt/kvm/arm64/guest.c | 100 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm64/guest.c b/virt/kvm/arm64/guest.c
index 35ba03033b4c..11509382d594 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm64/guest.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm64/guest.c
@@ -65,69 +65,96 @@ static int core_reg_size_from_offset(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 off)
return size;
}
-static void *core_reg_addr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg)
+static int core_reg_rw(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 reg_id, void *valp, bool read)
{
- u64 off = core_reg_offset_from_id(reg->id);
+ u64 off = core_reg_offset_from_id(reg_id);
int size = core_reg_size_from_offset(vcpu, off);
+ void *addr;
- if (size < 0)
- return NULL;
+ if (size < 0 || (KVM_REG_SIZE(reg_id) != size))
+ return -EINVAL;
- if (KVM_REG_SIZE(reg->id) != size)
- return NULL;
+ switch (off) {
+ case KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(elr_el1):
+ if (read)
+ *(u64 *)valp = vcpu_read_sys_reg(vcpu, ELR_EL1);
+ else
+ vcpu_write_sys_reg(vcpu, *(u64 *)valp, ELR_EL1);
+ return 0;
+
+ case KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(spsr[KVM_SPSR_EL1]):
+ if (read)
+ *(u64 *)valp = vcpu_read_sys_reg(vcpu, SPSR_EL1);
+ else
+ vcpu_write_sys_reg(vcpu, *(u64 *)valp, SPSR_EL1);
+ return 0;
+ }
switch (off) {
case KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(regs.regs[0]) ...
KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(regs.regs[30]):
off -= KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(regs.regs[0]);
off /= 2;
- return &vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)[off];
+ addr = &vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)[off];
+ break;
case KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(regs.sp):
- return vcpu_sp_el0(vcpu);
+ addr = vcpu_sp_el0(vcpu);
+ break;
case KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(regs.pc):
- return vcpu_pc(vcpu);
+ addr = vcpu_pc(vcpu);
+ break;
case KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(regs.pstate):
- return vcpu_cpsr(vcpu);
+ addr = vcpu_cpsr(vcpu);
+ break;
case KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(sp_el1):
- return kvm_vcpu_get_sp_el1(vcpu);
-
- case KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(elr_el1):
- return __ctxt_sys_reg(&vcpu->arch.ctxt, ELR_EL1);
-
- case KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(spsr[KVM_SPSR_EL1]):
- return __ctxt_sys_reg(&vcpu->arch.ctxt, SPSR_EL1);
+ addr = kvm_vcpu_get_sp_el1(vcpu);
+ break;
case KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(spsr[KVM_SPSR_ABT]):
- return &vcpu->arch.ctxt.spsr_abt;
+ addr = &vcpu->arch.ctxt.spsr_abt;
+ break;
case KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(spsr[KVM_SPSR_UND]):
- return &vcpu->arch.ctxt.spsr_und;
+ addr = &vcpu->arch.ctxt.spsr_und;
+ break;
case KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(spsr[KVM_SPSR_IRQ]):
- return &vcpu->arch.ctxt.spsr_irq;
+ addr = &vcpu->arch.ctxt.spsr_irq;
+ break;
case KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(spsr[KVM_SPSR_FIQ]):
- return &vcpu->arch.ctxt.spsr_fiq;
+ addr = &vcpu->arch.ctxt.spsr_fiq;
+ break;
case KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(fp_regs.vregs[0]) ...
KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(fp_regs.vregs[31]):
off -= KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(fp_regs.vregs[0]);
off /= 4;
- return kvm_vcpu_get_vreg(vcpu, off);
+ addr = kvm_vcpu_get_vreg(vcpu, off);
+ break;
case KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(fp_regs.fpsr):
- return kvm_vcpu_get_fpsr(vcpu);
+ addr = kvm_vcpu_get_fpsr(vcpu);
+ break;
case KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(fp_regs.fpcr):
- return kvm_vcpu_get_fpcr(vcpu);
+ addr = kvm_vcpu_get_fpcr(vcpu);
+ break;
default:
- return NULL;
+ return -EINVAL;
}
+
+ if (read)
+ memcpy(valp, addr, size);
+ else
+ memcpy(addr, valp, size);
+
+ return 0;
}
int get_core_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg)
@@ -140,7 +167,9 @@ int get_core_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg)
*/
__u32 __user *uaddr = (__u32 __user *)(unsigned long)reg->addr;
int nr_regs = sizeof(struct kvm_regs) / sizeof(__u32);
- void *addr;
+ __uint128_t tmp;
+ void *valp = &tmp;
+ int ret;
u32 off;
/* Our ID is an index into the kvm_regs struct. */
@@ -149,11 +178,12 @@ int get_core_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg)
(off + (KVM_REG_SIZE(reg->id) / sizeof(__u32))) >= nr_regs)
return -ENOENT;
- addr = core_reg_addr(vcpu, reg);
- if (!addr)
- return -EINVAL;
- if (copy_to_user(uaddr, addr, KVM_REG_SIZE(reg->id)))
+ ret = core_reg_rw(vcpu, reg->id, valp, true);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ if (copy_to_user(uaddr, valp, KVM_REG_SIZE(reg->id)))
return -EFAULT;
return 0;
@@ -164,7 +194,7 @@ int set_core_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg)
__u32 __user *uaddr = (__u32 __user *)(unsigned long)reg->addr;
int nr_regs = sizeof(struct kvm_regs) / sizeof(__u32);
__uint128_t tmp;
- void *valp = &tmp, *addr;
+ void *valp = &tmp;
u64 off;
int err = 0;
@@ -174,10 +204,6 @@ int set_core_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg)
(off + (KVM_REG_SIZE(reg->id) / sizeof(__u32))) >= nr_regs)
return -ENOENT;
- addr = core_reg_addr(vcpu, reg);
- if (!addr)
- return -EINVAL;
-
if (KVM_REG_SIZE(reg->id) > sizeof(tmp))
return -EINVAL;
@@ -220,7 +246,9 @@ int set_core_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg)
}
}
- memcpy(addr, valp, KVM_REG_SIZE(reg->id));
+ err = core_reg_rw(vcpu, reg->id, valp, false);
+ if (err)
+ goto out;
if (*vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) & PSR_MODE32_BIT) {
int i, nr_reg;
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-29 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-29 15:55 [PATCH v1 00/26] KVM: arm64 on s390 System Register Handling Steffen Eiden
2026-05-29 15:55 ` [PATCH v1 01/26] KVM: arm64: Extract some feature related changes to kvm_feature.h Steffen Eiden
2026-05-29 15:55 ` [PATCH v1 02/26] KVM: arm64: Remove __expand_field_sign_(un)signed Steffen Eiden
2026-05-29 15:55 ` [PATCH v1 03/26] KVM: arm64: Generalize get_idreg_field_*() Steffen Eiden
2026-05-29 15:55 ` [PATCH v1 04/26] KVM: arm64: Generalize kvm_cmp_feat_*() Steffen Eiden
2026-05-29 15:55 ` [PATCH v1 05/26] KVM: arm64: Generalize kvm_has_feat_* Steffen Eiden
2026-05-29 15:55 ` [PATCH v1 06/26] KVM: arm64: Remove get_idreg_field_*() and kvm_cmp_feat_*() Steffen Eiden
2026-05-29 15:55 ` [PATCH v1 07/26] KVM: arm64: Remove kvm_has_feat_range Steffen Eiden
2026-05-29 15:55 ` [PATCH v1 08/26] KVM: arm64: Split up feature sysreg sanitisation Steffen Eiden
2026-05-29 15:55 ` [PATCH v1 09/26] KVM: arm64: Refactor idreg caching into dedicated structure Steffen Eiden
2026-06-01 22:28 ` Oliver Upton
2026-05-29 15:55 ` [PATCH v1 10/26] KVM: arm64: Fix set_oslsr_el1 to write to OSLAR_EL1 Steffen Eiden
2026-06-01 22:21 ` Oliver Upton
2026-06-02 9:31 ` Andreas Grapentin
2026-05-29 15:55 ` [PATCH v1 11/26] KVM: arm64: Move definitions from sys_regs.c to sys_regs.h Steffen Eiden
2026-05-29 15:55 ` [PATCH v1 12/26] KVM: arm64: Add PVM_ prefix to avoid name collisions Steffen Eiden
2026-06-01 22:23 ` Oliver Upton
2026-05-29 15:55 ` [PATCH v1 13/26] s390: Introduce read/write ARM sysreg instructions Steffen Eiden
2026-05-29 15:55 ` [PATCH v1 14/26] s390: Introduce Query Available Arm features Steffen Eiden
2026-05-29 15:55 ` [PATCH v1 15/26] s390: Add functions to query arm guest time Steffen Eiden
2026-06-01 22:25 ` Oliver Upton
2026-05-29 15:55 ` [PATCH v1 16/26] KVM: s390: arm64: Add sysreg related functions and definitions Steffen Eiden
2026-05-29 15:55 ` [PATCH v1 17/26] arm64: Extract cputype definitions Steffen Eiden
2026-05-29 15:55 ` [PATCH v1 18/26] arm64: Extract cache definitions Steffen Eiden
2026-05-29 15:55 ` [PATCH v1 19/26] KVM: arm64: Share KVM feature detection macros Steffen Eiden
2026-05-29 15:55 ` [PATCH v1 20/26] KVM: arm64: Share ID reg handling Steffen Eiden
2026-05-29 15:55 ` Steffen Eiden [this message]
2026-05-29 15:55 ` [PATCH v1 23/26] KVM: s390: arm64: Implement feature sanitisation Steffen Eiden
2026-05-29 15:55 ` [PATCH v1 24/26] KVM: s390: arm64: Implement sysreg handling Steffen Eiden
2026-05-29 15:55 ` [PATCH v1 25/26] KVM: s390: arm64: Implement exception injection Steffen Eiden
2026-05-29 15:55 ` [PATCH v1 26/26] KVM: s390: arm64: Finalize page fault handling Steffen Eiden
2026-06-01 15:52 ` [PATCH v1 00/26] KVM: arm64 on s390 System Register Handling Claudio Imbrenda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260529155601.2927240-23-seiden@linux.ibm.com \
--to=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=brueckner@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=fritz@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ggala@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gra@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hari55@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=oss@nina.schoetterlglausch.eu \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox