Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: yc_hsieh@aspeedtech.com
Cc: Corey Minyard <corey@minyard.net>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>,
	Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au>,
	openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] dt-bindings: ipmi: Add optional LPC properties to ASPEED BT devices
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2026 16:26:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260629-bogus-vocation-db32e55a595f@spud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260629-aspeed-bt-bmc-multichannel-v1-3-fc23ee337f7a@aspeedtech.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2563 bytes --]

On Mon, Jun 29, 2026 at 02:49:00PM +0800, Yu-Che Hsieh via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Yu-Che Hsieh <yc_hsieh@aspeedtech.com>
> 
> Allocating IO and IRQ resources to LPC devices is in-theory an operation
> 
> for the host, however ASPEED systems describe these resources through
> 
> BMC-internal configuration, as already supported by the ASPEED KCS BMC
> 
> binding.
> 
> Add aspeed,lpc-io-reg and aspeed,lpc-interrupts to the ASPEED BT BMC
> 
> binding so firmware can describe the host LPC IO address and SerIRQ
> 
> configuration using the same properties as KCS devices.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yu-Che Hsieh <yc_hsieh@aspeedtech.com>
> ---
>  .../bindings/ipmi/aspeed,ast2400-ibt-bmc.yaml       | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ipmi/aspeed,ast2400-ibt-bmc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ipmi/aspeed,ast2400-ibt-bmc.yaml
> index c4f7cdbbe16b..1803c6bbae93 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ipmi/aspeed,ast2400-ibt-bmc.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ipmi/aspeed,ast2400-ibt-bmc.yaml
> @@ -25,6 +25,24 @@ properties:
>    interrupts:
>      maxItems: 1
>  
> +  aspeed,lpc-io-reg:
> +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-array
> +    maxItems: 1
> +    description: |
> +      The host CPU LPC IO address for the BT device.
> +
> +  aspeed,lpc-interrupts:
> +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-array
> +    minItems: 2
> +    maxItems: 2
> +    description: |
> +      A 2-cell property expressing the LPC SerIRQ number and the interrupt
> +      level/sense encoding (specified in the standard fashion).
> +
> +      Note that the generated interrupt is issued from the BMC to the host, and
> +      thus the target interrupt controller is not captured by the BMC's
> +      devicetree.

Why can these two properties not just be an additional reg and
interrupts entry?


Cheers,
Conor.

> +
>  required:
>    - compatible
>    - reg
> @@ -35,10 +53,13 @@ additionalProperties: false
>  examples:
>    - |
>      #include <dt-bindings/clock/aspeed-clock.h>
> +    #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
>  
>      bt@1e789140 {
>          compatible = "aspeed,ast2400-ibt-bmc";
>          reg = <0x1e789140 0x18>;
>          interrupts = <8>;
>          clocks = <&syscon ASPEED_CLK_GATE_LCLK>;
> +        aspeed,lpc-io-reg = <0xe4>;
> +        aspeed,lpc-interrupts = <10 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>;
>      };
> 
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 
> 

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-29 15:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-29  6:48 [PATCH 0/4] ipmi: bt-bmc: Add configurable LPC host interface Yu-Che Hsieh via B4 Relay
2026-06-29  6:48 ` [PATCH 1/4] ipmi: bt-bmc: Use bitfield helpers for register definitions Yu-Che Hsieh via B4 Relay
2026-06-29  6:48 ` [PATCH 2/4] ipmi: bt-bmc: Track open state per device Yu-Che Hsieh via B4 Relay
2026-06-29  6:49 ` [PATCH 3/4] dt-bindings: ipmi: Add optional LPC properties to ASPEED BT devices Yu-Che Hsieh via B4 Relay
2026-06-29 15:26   ` Conor Dooley [this message]
2026-06-30  2:24     ` YC Hsieh
2026-06-30 17:15       ` Conor Dooley
2026-06-30  6:11   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-06-30 17:51     ` Rob Herring
2026-06-29  6:49 ` [PATCH 4/4] ipmi: bt-bmc: Read LPC address and SerIRQ from device tree Yu-Che Hsieh via B4 Relay

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260629-bogus-vocation-db32e55a595f@spud \
    --to=conor@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrew@codeconstruct.com.au \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=corey@minyard.net \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=joel@jms.id.au \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=yc_hsieh@aspeedtech.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox