From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@google.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Backport ARM64 VHE boot fixes to 6.6.y
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2026 08:16:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026070224-small-apprehend-b71b@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260701204342.2654385-1-coltonlewis@google.com>
On Wed, Jul 01, 2026 at 08:43:37PM +0000, Colton Lewis wrote:
> This series backports VHE CPU boot fixes to the 6.6.y stable branch.
>
> These fixes are already present in the 6.12.y stable branch (and
> newer), but are missing in 6.6.y. They are required to enable booting
> L1 guests with nested virtualization enabled (kvm-arm.mode=nested).
>
> Without these patches, a 6.6.y guest boots with HCR_EL2.E2H
> incorrectly configured (because it misses VHE-only detection or early
> initialization), causing early boot hangs/trap loops.
Why is this needed for 6.6.y? Why not just use 6.12.y and newer for
systems that require this new feature? What is preventing that from
happening?
thanks,
greg k-h
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-02 6:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-01 20:43 [PATCH 0/5] Backport ARM64 VHE boot fixes to 6.6.y Colton Lewis
2026-07-01 20:43 ` [PATCH 1/5] arm64: sysreg: Add layout for ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1 Colton Lewis
2026-07-01 20:43 ` [PATCH 2/5] arm64: Treat HCR_EL2.E2H as RES1 when ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1.E2H0 is negative Colton Lewis
2026-07-01 23:30 ` Oliver Upton
2026-07-01 20:43 ` [PATCH 3/5] arm64: Fix early handling of FEAT_E2H0 not being implemented Colton Lewis
2026-07-01 20:43 ` [PATCH 4/5] KVM: arm64: Initialize HCR_EL2.E2H early Colton Lewis
2026-07-01 23:45 ` Oliver Upton
2026-07-01 20:43 ` [PATCH 5/5] arm64: Revamp HCR_EL2.E2H RES1 detection Colton Lewis
2026-07-01 23:23 ` [PATCH 0/5] Backport ARM64 VHE boot fixes to 6.6.y Oliver Upton
2026-07-02 0:01 ` Oliver Upton
2026-07-02 0:38 ` Sasha Levin
2026-07-02 6:16 ` Greg KH [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2026070224-small-apprehend-b71b@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=coltonlewis@google.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mizhang@google.com \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox