From: Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>
To: Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@google.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] arm64: Treat HCR_EL2.E2H as RES1 when ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1.E2H0 is negative
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2026 16:30:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <akWi_E_tQPzhlfc-@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260701204342.2654385-3-coltonlewis@google.com>
On Wed, Jul 01, 2026 at 08:43:39PM +0000, Colton Lewis wrote:
> From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
>
> [ Upstream commit 3944382fa6f22b54bc3624c9657b98ec34b5ba59 ]
What is this? I have the commit in question as
3944382fa6f22b54fd399632b1af92c28123979b
> For CPUs that have ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1.E2H0 as negative, it is important
> to avoid the boot path that sets HCR_EL2.E2H=0. Fortunately, we
> already have this path to cope with fruity CPUs.
>
> Tweak init_el2 to look at ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1.E2H0 first.
>
> Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240122181344.258974-8-maz@kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/head.S | 23 +++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S
> index 6517bf2644a08..e32c8dd0b17a7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S
> @@ -589,25 +589,32 @@ SYM_INNER_LABEL(init_el2, SYM_L_LOCAL)
> mov_q x1, INIT_SCTLR_EL1_MMU_OFF
>
> /*
> - * Fruity CPUs seem to have HCR_EL2.E2H set to RES1,
> - * making it impossible to start in nVHE mode. Is that
> - * compliant with the architecture? Absolutely not!
> + * Compliant CPUs advertise their VHE-onlyness with
> + * ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1.E2H0 < 0. HCR_EL2.E2H can be
> + * RES1 in that case.
> + *
> + * Fruity CPUs seem to have HCR_EL2.E2H set to RES1, but
> + * don't advertise it (they predate this relaxation).
> */
> + mrs_s x0, SYS_ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1
> + ubfx x0, x0, #ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1_E2H0_SHIFT, #ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1_E2H0_WIDTH
> + tbnz x0, #(ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1_E2H0_SHIFT + ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1_E2H0_WIDTH - 1), 1f
> +
> mrs x0, hcr_el2
> and x0, x0, #HCR_E2H
> - cbz x0, 1f
> -
> + cbz x0, 2f
> +1:
> /* Set a sane SCTLR_EL1, the VHE way */
> pre_disable_mmu_workaround
> msr_s SYS_SCTLR_EL12, x1
> mov x2, #BOOT_CPU_FLAG_E2H
> - b 2f
> + b 3f
>
> -1:
> +2:
> pre_disable_mmu_workaround
> msr sctlr_el1, x1
> mov x2, xzr
> -2:
> +3:
> __init_el2_nvhe_prepare_eret
>
> mov w0, #BOOT_CPU_MODE_EL2
> --
> 2.55.0.rc2.803.g1fd1e6609c-goog
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-01 23:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-01 20:43 [PATCH 0/5] Backport ARM64 VHE boot fixes to 6.6.y Colton Lewis
2026-07-01 20:43 ` [PATCH 1/5] arm64: sysreg: Add layout for ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1 Colton Lewis
2026-07-01 20:43 ` [PATCH 2/5] arm64: Treat HCR_EL2.E2H as RES1 when ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1.E2H0 is negative Colton Lewis
2026-07-01 23:30 ` Oliver Upton [this message]
2026-07-01 20:43 ` [PATCH 3/5] arm64: Fix early handling of FEAT_E2H0 not being implemented Colton Lewis
2026-07-01 20:43 ` [PATCH 4/5] KVM: arm64: Initialize HCR_EL2.E2H early Colton Lewis
2026-07-01 23:45 ` Oliver Upton
2026-07-01 20:43 ` [PATCH 5/5] arm64: Revamp HCR_EL2.E2H RES1 detection Colton Lewis
2026-07-01 23:23 ` [PATCH 0/5] Backport ARM64 VHE boot fixes to 6.6.y Oliver Upton
2026-07-02 0:01 ` Oliver Upton
2026-07-02 0:38 ` Sasha Levin
2026-07-02 6:16 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=akWi_E_tQPzhlfc-@kernel.org \
--to=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=coltonlewis@google.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mizhang@google.com \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox