Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>
To: Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@google.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
	Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Backport ARM64 VHE boot fixes to 6.6.y
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2026 16:23:21 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <akWhad3U5VNjWzxu@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260701204342.2654385-1-coltonlewis@google.com>

The subject prefix should be "[PATCH 6.6 0/5]" so people know right up
front where this is going.

On Wed, Jul 01, 2026 at 08:43:37PM +0000, Colton Lewis wrote:
> This series backports VHE CPU boot fixes to the 6.6.y stable branch.
> 
> These fixes are already present in the 6.12.y stable branch (and
> newer), but are missing in 6.6.y. They are required to enable booting
> L1 guests with nested virtualization enabled (kvm-arm.mode=nested).

It's a bit worse than this. The architecture retroactively made
FEAT_E2H0 an optional feature, there are now implementations in the wild
that do not support the feature.

> Without these patches, a 6.6.y guest boots with HCR_EL2.E2H
> incorrectly configured (because it misses VHE-only detection or early
> initialization), causing early boot hangs/trap loops.
> 
> Conflict resolutions:
> - Patch 4 (KVM: arm64: Initialize HCR_EL2.E2H early) had conflicts in
>   arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S due to differences in state
>   initialization. Resolved by extracting EL2 state initialization into
>   __kvm_init_el2_state.
> - Patch 5 (arm64: Revamp HCR_EL2.E2H RES1 detection) had conflicts in
>   arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h. Resolved by using raw msr hcr_el2
>   instead of the missing msr_hcr_el2 macro.
> 
> 
> Marc Zyngier (4):
>   arm64: sysreg: Add layout for ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1
>   arm64: Treat HCR_EL2.E2H as RES1 when ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1.E2H0 is
>     negative
>   arm64: Fix early handling of FEAT_E2H0 not being implemented
>   arm64: Revamp HCR_EL2.E2H RES1 detection
> 
> Mark Rutland (1):
>   KVM: arm64: Initialize HCR_EL2.E2H early
> 
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm64/kernel/head.S           | 17 +++-------
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S | 16 +++++++--
>  arch/arm64/tools/sysreg            | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> base-commit: d1cfde2d5d15be14123bdd1689162bd27f995a90
> --
> 2.55.0.rc2.803.g1fd1e6609c-goog
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-01 23:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-01 20:43 [PATCH 0/5] Backport ARM64 VHE boot fixes to 6.6.y Colton Lewis
2026-07-01 20:43 ` [PATCH 1/5] arm64: sysreg: Add layout for ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1 Colton Lewis
2026-07-01 20:43 ` [PATCH 2/5] arm64: Treat HCR_EL2.E2H as RES1 when ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1.E2H0 is negative Colton Lewis
2026-07-01 23:30   ` Oliver Upton
2026-07-01 20:43 ` [PATCH 3/5] arm64: Fix early handling of FEAT_E2H0 not being implemented Colton Lewis
2026-07-01 20:43 ` [PATCH 4/5] KVM: arm64: Initialize HCR_EL2.E2H early Colton Lewis
2026-07-01 23:45   ` Oliver Upton
2026-07-01 20:43 ` [PATCH 5/5] arm64: Revamp HCR_EL2.E2H RES1 detection Colton Lewis
2026-07-01 23:23 ` Oliver Upton [this message]
2026-07-02  0:01   ` [PATCH 0/5] Backport ARM64 VHE boot fixes to 6.6.y Oliver Upton
2026-07-02  0:38 ` Sasha Levin
2026-07-02  6:16 ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=akWhad3U5VNjWzxu@kernel.org \
    --to=oupton@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=coltonlewis@google.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=mizhang@google.com \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox