[PATCH] clk: rockchip: fix some clocks' name to be more standard style

[PATCH] clk: rockchip: fix some clocks' name to be more standard style

[Jianqun Xu]

Fix aclk_emmcgrf to aclk_emmc_grf, and fix aclk_emmccore to be
aclk_emmc_core.

Signed-off-by: Jianqun Xu <jay.xu@rock-chips.com>
---
 drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3399.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3399.c b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3399.c
index 2c7cba7..b3df2c6 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3399.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3399.c
@@ -935,11 +935,11 @@ static struct rockchip_clk_branch rk3399_clk_branches[] __initdata = {
 			RK3399_CLKGATE_CON(6), 13, GFLAGS),
 	COMPOSITE_NOGATE(ACLK_EMMC, "aclk_emmc", mux_aclk_emmc_p, CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED,
 			RK3399_CLKSEL_CON(21), 7, 1, MFLAGS, 0, 5, DFLAGS),
-	GATE(ACLK_EMMC_CORE, "aclk_emmccore", "aclk_emmc", CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED,
+	GATE(ACLK_EMMC_CORE, "aclk_emmc_core", "aclk_emmc", CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED,
 			RK3399_CLKGATE_CON(32), 8, GFLAGS),
 	GATE(ACLK_EMMC_NOC, "aclk_emmc_noc", "aclk_emmc", CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED,
 			RK3399_CLKGATE_CON(32), 9, GFLAGS),
-	GATE(ACLK_EMMC_GRF, "aclk_emmcgrf", "aclk_emmc", CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED,
+	GATE(ACLK_EMMC_GRF, "aclk_emmc_grf", "aclk_emmc", CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED,
 			RK3399_CLKGATE_CON(32), 10, GFLAGS),
 
 	/* perilp0 */
-- 
1.9.1

[PATCH] clk: rockchip: fix some clocks' name to be more standard style

[Shawn Lin]

On 2016/11/2 15:04, Jianqun Xu wrote:
> Fix aclk_emmcgrf to aclk_emmc_grf, and fix aclk_emmccore to be
> aclk_emmc_core.
>

What is the standard style should be?

TRM uses aclk_emmccore but not aclk_emmc_core, so should it be more
standrad to keep it as-is?

> Signed-off-by: Jianqun Xu <jay.xu@rock-chips.com>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3399.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3399.c b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3399.c
> index 2c7cba7..b3df2c6 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3399.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3399.c
> @@ -935,11 +935,11 @@ static struct rockchip_clk_branch rk3399_clk_branches[] __initdata = {
>  			RK3399_CLKGATE_CON(6), 13, GFLAGS),
>  	COMPOSITE_NOGATE(ACLK_EMMC, "aclk_emmc", mux_aclk_emmc_p, CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED,
>  			RK3399_CLKSEL_CON(21), 7, 1, MFLAGS, 0, 5, DFLAGS),
> -	GATE(ACLK_EMMC_CORE, "aclk_emmccore", "aclk_emmc", CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED,
> +	GATE(ACLK_EMMC_CORE, "aclk_emmc_core", "aclk_emmc", CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED,
>  			RK3399_CLKGATE_CON(32), 8, GFLAGS),
>  	GATE(ACLK_EMMC_NOC, "aclk_emmc_noc", "aclk_emmc", CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED,
>  			RK3399_CLKGATE_CON(32), 9, GFLAGS),
> -	GATE(ACLK_EMMC_GRF, "aclk_emmcgrf", "aclk_emmc", CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED,
> +	GATE(ACLK_EMMC_GRF, "aclk_emmc_grf", "aclk_emmc", CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED,
>  			RK3399_CLKGATE_CON(32), 10, GFLAGS),
>
>  	/* perilp0 */
>


-- 
Best Regards
Shawn Lin

[PATCH] clk: rockchip: fix some clocks' name to be more standard style

[Heiko Stübner]

Am Donnerstag, 3. November 2016, 16:52:48 schrieb Shawn Lin:
> On 2016/11/2 15:04, Jianqun Xu wrote:
> > Fix aclk_emmcgrf to aclk_emmc_grf, and fix aclk_emmccore to be
> > aclk_emmc_core.
> 
> What is the standard style should be?
> 
> TRM uses aclk_emmccore but not aclk_emmc_core, so should it be more
> standrad to keep it as-is?

I tend to agree with Shawn. While it looks like the missing "_" is some sort 
of mistake, we should strive to follow TRM naming, so grepping so it becomes 
easier to look for informations in these things in the TRM.

Same reason for naming our regulators and pinctrl after the names used in 
device schematics, if available.


Heiko

[PATCH] clk: rockchip: fix some clocks' name to be more standard style

[jay.xu]

Hi Heiko and Shawn:

ok, I agree with you, and the root fix seems to fix it in the TRM first.
I'll feedback to TRM makers.

Thanks.

On 2016?11?03? 22:32, Heiko St?bner wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 3. November 2016, 16:52:48 schrieb Shawn Lin:
>> On 2016/11/2 15:04, Jianqun Xu wrote:
>>> Fix aclk_emmcgrf to aclk_emmc_grf, and fix aclk_emmccore to be
>>> aclk_emmc_core.
>>
>> What is the standard style should be?
>>
>> TRM uses aclk_emmccore but not aclk_emmc_core, so should it be more
>> standrad to keep it as-is?
>
> I tend to agree with Shawn. While it looks like the missing "_" is some sort
> of mistake, we should strive to follow TRM naming, so grepping so it becomes
> easier to look for informations in these things in the TRM.
>
> Same reason for naming our regulators and pinctrl after the names used in
> device schematics, if available.
>
>
> Heiko
>
>
>