From: Jian Hu <jian.hu@amlogic.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
robh+dt <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-clk <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-amlogic <linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Ronald Claveau <linux-kernel-dev@aliel.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: clock: amlogic: t7: Add missing mpll3 parent clock
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2026 20:38:44 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5661aa0b-de22-4392-9080-969d01bf48b5@amlogic.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0f336f9c-455d-4438-8b65-442ba9501e92@kernel.org>
On 3/10/2026 3:08 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
>
> On 10/03/2026 07:51, Jian Hu wrote:
>> On 3/6/2026 4:12 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 05, 2026 at 03:43:26PM +0800, Jian Hu wrote:
>>>> The mpll3 clock is a valid parent clock for sd_emmc and mipi_isp on
>>>> the Amlogic T7 SoC, but was missing from t7-peripherals-clkc.yaml.
>>>> Add it to enable proper clock parent configuration for these peripherals.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jian Hu <jian.hu@amlogic.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> .../bindings/clock/amlogic,t7-peripherals-clkc.yaml | 8 ++++++--
>>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/amlogic,t7-peripherals-clkc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/amlogic,t7-peripherals-clkc.yaml
>>>> index 55bb73707d58..27cc1f331587 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/amlogic,t7-peripherals-clkc.yaml
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/amlogic,t7-peripherals-clkc.yaml
>>>> @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ properties:
>>>> const: 1
>>>>
>>>> clocks:
>>>> - minItems: 14
>>>> + minItems: 15
>>>> items:
>>>> - description: input oscillator
>>>> - description: input sys clk
>>>> @@ -40,12 +40,13 @@ properties:
>>>> - description: input gp1 pll
>>>> - description: input mpll1
>>>> - description: input mpll2
>>>> + - description: input mpll3
>>> Nah, ABI break. You add it to the end of the list or provide arguments
>>> on ABI impact.
>> The third patch in this series enables the DT for the Amlogic T7 clock
>> controller.
>>
>> The clock controller node for amlogic,t7-peripherals-clkc has not been
>> merged upstream yet.
>> This change modifies the clock index order, but it will not break any
>> existing device tree since the
>> amlogic,t7-peripherals-clkc bindings are not used by any upstream or
>> downstream DT at this time.
>>
>> Therefore, it does NOT break the ABI.
> It does. Clearly visible from the diff above, because the order is the ABI.
Got it, I understand your point that changing the order break the ABI
(since index order is part of the ABI).
>> The last clock entry is an external pad input for RTC and it is optional.
>> For logical consistency, it is better to place the required mpll3 entry
>> before the optional entry.
>>
>> If this change does not break the ABI, could I keep it in its original
>> logical order right after mpll2?
> Change breaks the ABI and commit must explain why and the impact.
>
It does break the ABI.
The mpll3 clock is one parent clock of sd_emmc and mipi_isp clock on
the Amlogic T7 SoC, but was missing from t7-peripherals-clkc.yaml.
Add the mpll3 clock source for the T7 peripherals clock controller.
so that sd_emmc and mipi_isp can use mpll3. That's why this patch is added.
While the amlogic,t7-peripherals-clkc bindings have been merged upstream,
the corresponding device tree (DT) that uses these bindings has not been
merged yet.
As a result, there are no real-world users or systems
that would be broken by this change.
So could I update the commit message like:
The mpll3 clock is one parent clock of sd_emmc and mipi_isp clock on the
Amlogic T7 SoC,
but was missing from t7-peripherals-clkc.yaml.
Add the mpll3 clock source for the T7 peripherals clock controller.
so that sd_emmc and mipi_isp can use it.
For logical consistency, place the required mpll3 entry before the
optional entry.
This change will break the ABI, but while the
amlogic,t7-peripherals-clkc bindings
have been merged upstream, the corresponding DT has not been merged yet.
Thus, no real users or systems are broken by this change.
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-10 12:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-05 7:43 [PATCH 0/3] Add the missing mpll3 clock and clock controller nodes Jian Hu
2026-03-05 7:43 ` [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: clock: amlogic: Fix a typo Jian Hu
2026-03-05 8:57 ` Jerome Brunet
2026-03-06 6:57 ` Jian Hu
2026-03-06 8:11 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-03-09 3:28 ` Jian Hu
2026-03-05 7:43 ` [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: clock: amlogic: t7: Add missing mpll3 parent clock Jian Hu
2026-03-05 9:03 ` Jerome Brunet
2026-03-06 7:36 ` Jian Hu
2026-03-06 8:14 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-03-10 7:42 ` Jian Hu
2026-03-05 13:45 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2026-03-06 7:53 ` Jian Hu
2026-03-06 8:12 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-03-10 6:51 ` Jian Hu
2026-03-10 7:08 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-03-10 12:38 ` Jian Hu [this message]
2026-03-05 7:43 ` [PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: amlogic: t7: Add clock controller nodes Jian Hu
2026-03-05 9:04 ` Jerome Brunet
2026-03-06 7:42 ` Jian Hu
2026-03-06 7:47 ` Ronald Claveau
2026-03-06 8:10 ` Jian Hu
2026-03-10 17:30 ` Ferass El Hafidi
2026-03-11 3:36 ` Jian Hu
2026-03-11 7:53 ` Ronald Claveau
2026-03-11 11:48 ` Jian Hu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5661aa0b-de22-4392-9080-969d01bf48b5@amlogic.com \
--to=jian.hu@amlogic.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jbrunet@baylibre.com \
--cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-dev@aliel.fr \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox