From: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
To: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: <mark.rutland@arm.com>, <maz@kernel.org>, <will@kernel.org>,
<catalin.marinas@arm.com>, <liaochang1@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 21/45] arm64: gicv3: remove GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2026 17:53:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <88bdbbd3-8644-49f0-ac64-30eb58679c4f@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260727163453.7969-22-vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
在 2026/7/28 0:34, Vladimir Murzin 写道:
> From: Ada Couprie Diaz <ada.coupriediaz@arm.com>
>
> `GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET` was used to keep track of sections of the kernel
> where interrupts always need to reach the CPU and could not be masked
I understand it's used in scenarios similar to CPU idle entering WFI,
where the CPU needs to be woken up by interrupts.
> via interrupt priorities, or DAIF bypassed the status of the PMR.
>
> This flag unmasked IRQs when OR'd to GIC_PRIO_IRQON and ensured that
Yes GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET | GIC_PRIO_IRQON has has a lower PMR priority ,so
unmask the IRQs.
> that IRQs were seen as disabled by the `local_irqs_...` functions,
Yes, a flags value that is not equal to GIC_PRIO_IRQON is regarded as
the disabled state for interrupts.
> as they would only check the PMR if pseudo-NMIs were enabled.
>
> This is not needed anymore as our IRQ masking APIs now know how to handle
> interrupt priorities properly and in parallel with DAIF : remove it.
Reviewed-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Ada Couprie Diaz <ada.coupriediaz@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h | 2 --
> include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3-prio.h | 8 --------
> 2 files changed, 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h
> index e4c7e6bafa3d..cf7e51b8ef0b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h
> @@ -24,8 +24,6 @@
> #define GIC_PRIO_IRQON GICV3_PRIO_UNMASKED
> #define GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF GICV3_PRIO_IRQ
>
> -#define GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET GICV3_PRIO_PSR_I_SET
> -
> /* Additional SPSR bits not exposed in the UABI */
> #define PSR_MODE_THREAD_BIT (1 << 0)
> #define PSR_IL_BIT (1 << 20)
> diff --git a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3-prio.h b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3-prio.h
> index 44157c9abb78..464bf1d29453 100644
> --- a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3-prio.h
> +++ b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3-prio.h
> @@ -20,17 +20,11 @@
> * GICV3_PRIO_NMI is the PMR view of the priority of pseudo-NMIs. This can be
> * written to the PMR to mask pseudo-NMIs.
> *
> - * On arm64 some code sections either automatically switch back to PSR.I or
> - * explicitly require to not use priority masking. If bit GICV3_PRIO_PSR_I_SET
> - * is included in the priority mask, it indicates that PSR.I should be set and
> - * interrupt disabling temporarily does not rely on IRQ priorities.
> */
> #define GICV3_PRIO_UNMASKED 0xe0
> #define GICV3_PRIO_IRQ 0xc0
> #define GICV3_PRIO_NMI 0x80
>
> -#define GICV3_PRIO_PSR_I_SET (1 << 4)
> -
> #ifndef __ASSEMBLER__
>
> #define __gicv3_prio_to_ns(p) (0xff & ((p) << 1))
> @@ -45,8 +39,6 @@ static_assert(__gicv3_prio_valid_ns(GICV3_PRIO_IRQ));
> static_assert(GICV3_PRIO_NMI < GICV3_PRIO_IRQ);
> static_assert(GICV3_PRIO_IRQ < GICV3_PRIO_UNMASKED);
>
> -static_assert(GICV3_PRIO_IRQ < (GICV3_PRIO_IRQ | GICV3_PRIO_PSR_I_SET));
> -
> #endif /* __ASSEMBLER */
>
> #endif /* __LINUX_IRQCHIP_ARM_GIC_V3_PRIO_H */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-11 9:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 100+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-27 16:34 [RFC PATCH v2 00/45] arm64: Add support for FEAT_NMI Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-27 16:34 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/45] arm64: ptrace: Remove INIT_PSTATE_EL2 Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-27 16:34 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/45] arm64: debug: don't mask DAIF for mdscr_write() Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-27 16:34 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/45] arm64: hibernate: mask DAIF before restoring hibernated kernel Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-28 1:17 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-27 16:34 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/45] arm64: hibernate: Restore DAIF state on error Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-28 1:16 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-27 16:34 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/45] arm64: suspend: rely on daif helpers to handle PMR Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-27 16:34 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/45] arm64: suspend: Initialize PMR on resume Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-27 16:34 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/45] arm64: entry: mask DAIF before returning from C EL1 handlers Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-28 2:00 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-27 16:34 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/45] irqchip/gic-v3: make the unmasking of pseudo-NMIs explicit when handling IRQs Vladimir Murzin
2026-08-10 15:36 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-27 16:34 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/45] arm64: entry: Avoid unnecessary local_irq_disable() on kernel exit Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-28 3:18 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-08-03 9:32 ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-27 16:34 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/45] arm64: irqflags: Introduce arm64-specific irqflags type Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-28 2:42 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-27 16:34 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/45] arm64: irqflags: save and use both DAIF and PMR Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-28 3:46 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-27 16:34 ` [RFC PATCH v2 12/45] arm64: interrupts: Add common exception state helpers Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-28 8:20 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-08-03 9:40 ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-08-11 7:39 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-27 16:34 ` [RFC PATCH v2 13/45] arm64: process: Use helper to check exception state Vladimir Murzin
2026-08-11 7:43 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-27 16:34 ` [RFC PATCH v2 14/45] arm64: entry: Introduce entry specific exception masking helpers Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-28 8:48 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-08-03 12:12 ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-08-11 7:56 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-28 9:18 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-08-03 12:21 ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-08-11 8:13 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-08-11 8:37 ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-08-11 8:46 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-28 9:29 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-27 16:34 ` [RFC PATCH v2 15/45] arm64: entry: replace DAIF helpers with entry helpers Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-28 9:53 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-08-03 12:23 ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-27 16:34 ` [RFC PATCH v2 16/45] arm64: interrupts: Introduce exception masking save/restore helpers Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-28 11:56 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-08-03 12:24 ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-27 16:34 ` [RFC PATCH v2 17/45] arm64: interrupts: introduce a helper for GIC priority initialization Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-28 11:21 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-27 16:34 ` [RFC PATCH v2 18/45] arm64: replace local_daif helpers Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-28 12:04 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-27 16:34 ` [RFC PATCH v2 19/45] arm64: cpuidle: use new helpers to bypass interrupt priority masking Vladimir Murzin
2026-08-11 8:59 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-27 16:34 ` [RFC PATCH v2 20/45] arm64: remove daifflags.h Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-27 16:34 ` [RFC PATCH v2 21/45] arm64: gicv3: remove GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-28 12:08 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-08-03 12:27 ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-08-11 9:53 ` Jinjie Ruan [this message]
2026-07-27 16:34 ` [RFC PATCH v2 22/45] arm64: cpufeature: Remove system_has_prio_mask_debugging() Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-27 16:34 ` [RFC PATCH v2 23/45] arm64: irqflags: Switch to CONFIG_DEBUG_IRQFLAGS Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-27 16:34 ` [RFC PATCH v2 24/45] arm64: Kconfig: Remove CONFIG_ARM64_DEBUG_PRIORITY_MASKING Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-27 16:34 ` [RFC PATCH v2 25/45] efi/runtime-wrappers: Permit architectures to override IRQ flags checks Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-27 16:34 ` [RFC PATCH v2 26/45] arm64/efi: Implement override for " Vladimir Murzin
2026-08-11 12:28 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-27 16:34 ` [RFC PATCH v2 27/45] arm64: booting: Document boot requirements for FEAT_NMI Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-27 16:34 ` [RFC PATCH v2 28/45] arm64: sysreg: Add definitions for immediate versions of MSR ALLINT Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-27 16:34 ` [RFC PATCH v2 29/45] arm64: ptrace: Add PSR_ALLINT_BIT Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-28 3:58 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-27 16:34 ` [RFC PATCH v2 30/45] arm64: idreg: Add an override for FEAT_NMI Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-27 16:34 ` [RFC PATCH v2 31/45] arm64: cpufeature: Detect PE support " Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-27 16:34 ` [RFC PATCH v2 32/45] arm64: nmi: Manage masking for superpriority interrupts Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-28 12:14 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-08-03 12:28 ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-27 16:34 ` [RFC PATCH v2 33/45] arm64: irq: Report FEAT_NMI masking local IRQs Vladimir Murzin
2026-08-11 13:01 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-27 16:34 ` [RFC PATCH v2 34/45] arm64: nmi: Add handling of superpriority interrupts as NMIs Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-28 12:25 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-08-03 12:33 ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-08-07 9:58 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-27 16:34 ` [RFC PATCH v2 35/45] arm64: suspend: Always initialise PSTATE.ALLINT Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-27 16:34 ` [RFC PATCH v2 36/45] arm64/efi: Add ALLINT to IRQ flags checks Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-27 16:34 ` [RFC PATCH v2 37/45] arm64: kprobes: Disable NMIs Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-27 16:34 ` [RFC PATCH v2 38/45] arm64: smp: Abstract SGI and LPI operations Vladimir Murzin
2026-08-11 13:22 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-27 16:34 ` [RFC PATCH v2 39/45] arm64: smp: Fall back to IRQ when IPI NMI request fails Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-27 16:34 ` [RFC PATCH v2 40/45] arm64: nmi: Add Kconfig for NMI Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-28 6:24 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-08-03 9:36 ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-08-03 11:37 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-27 16:34 ` [RFC PATCH v2 41/45] irqchip/gic-v3: Prepare for FEAT_GICv3_NMI support Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-28 12:29 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-08-03 12:34 ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-27 16:34 ` [RFC PATCH v2 42/45] irqchip/gic-v3: Implement " Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-28 12:31 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-27 16:34 ` [RFC PATCH v2 43/45] arm64: smp: Add NMI support for LPI-backed IPIs Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-28 12:34 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-27 16:34 ` [RFC PATCH v2 44/45] irqchip/gic-v5: Add NMI support for PPIs, SPIs and LPIs Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-27 16:34 ` [RFC PATCH v2 45/45] irqchip/gic-v5: Add NMI support for IPIs Vladimir Murzin
2026-08-07 10:17 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-08-07 10:42 ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-08-07 10:57 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-08-07 12:28 ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-08-06 17:11 ` [RFC PATCH v2 00/45] arm64: Add support for FEAT_NMI Will Deacon
2026-08-07 8:33 ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-08-11 13:50 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=88bdbbd3-8644-49f0-ac64-30eb58679c4f@huawei.com \
--to=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=liaochang1@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=vladimir.murzin@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox