Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
To: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
	Srivathsa L Rao <srivathsa.rao@oss.qualcomm.com>,
	Ganapatrao Kulkarni <ganapatrao.kulkarni@oss.qualcomm.com>,
	Trilok Soni <tsoni@quicinc.com>,
	Srinivas Ramana <sramana@qti.qualcomm.com>,
	Niyas Sait <niyas.sait@arm.com>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 13/15] arm_mpam: add MPAM-Fb MSC firmware access support
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2026 23:54:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a3064c25-9a82-47e4-acff-7ec63b08bd11@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b72c0ba1-b7c3-4afd-b572-2f6a6eef8642@arm.com>

Hi,

On 7/8/26 13:21, Ben Horgan wrote:
> Hi Andre,
> 
> On 7/2/26 17:22, Andre Przywara wrote:
>> The Arm MPAM Firmware-backed (Fb) Profile document[1] describes an
>> alternative way of accessing the "Memory System Components" (MSC) in an
>> MPAM enabled system.
>> Normally the MSCs are MMIO mapped, but in some implementations this
>> might not be possible (MSC located outside of the local socket, MSC
>> mapped secure-only) or desirable (direct MMIO access too slow or needs
>> to be mediated through a control processor). MPAM-fb standardises a
>> protocol to abstract MSC accesses, building on the SCMI protocol.
>>
>> Add functions that do an MSC read or write access by redirecting the
>> request through a firmware interface. For now this done via an ACPI
>> PCC shared memory and mailbox combination.
>>
>> Since the protocol used is only a small subset of the full SCMI spec,
>> and the SCMI protocol has no full ACPI support anyway, open-code the
>> SCMI message generation and handshake, for just the fields we need.
>>
>> [1] https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0144/latest
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/resctrl/Makefile        |   2 +-
>>   drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c  |  27 +++++--
>>   drivers/resctrl/mpam_fb.c       | 137 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   drivers/resctrl/mpam_fb.h       |  17 ++++
>>   drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h |  12 +++
>>   include/linux/arm_mpam.h        |   2 +-
>>   6 files changed, 190 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/resctrl/mpam_fb.c
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/resctrl/mpam_fb.h
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/resctrl/Makefile b/drivers/resctrl/Makefile
>> index 4f6d0e81f9b8..097c036724e9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/resctrl/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/resctrl/Makefile
>> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
>>   obj-$(CONFIG_ARM64_MPAM_DRIVER)			+= mpam.o
>> -mpam-y						+= mpam_devices.o
>> +mpam-y						+= mpam_devices.o mpam_fb.o
>>   mpam-$(CONFIG_ARM64_MPAM_RESCTRL_FS)		+= mpam_resctrl.o
>>   
>>   ccflags-$(CONFIG_ARM64_MPAM_DRIVER_DEBUG)	+= -DDEBUG
>> diff --git a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
>> index 824bc6c97851..b858ff389bff 100644
>> --- a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
>> +++ b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
>> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
>>   #include <linux/workqueue.h>
>>   
>>   #include "mpam_internal.h"
>> +#include "mpam_fb.h"
>>   
>>   /* Values for the T241 errata workaround */
>>   #define T241_CHIPS_MAX			4
>> @@ -181,6 +182,9 @@ static int __mpam_read_reg(struct mpam_msc *msc, u16 reg, u32 *res)
>>   {
>>   	WARN_ON_ONCE(!cpumask_test_cpu(smp_processor_id(), &msc->accessibility));
>>   
>> +	if (msc->iface == MPAM_IFACE_PCC)
>> +		return mpam_fb_send_read_request(msc, reg, res);
>> +
>>   	*res = readl_relaxed(msc->mapped_hwpage + reg);
>>   
>>   	return 0;
>> @@ -197,9 +201,12 @@ static inline int _mpam_read_partsel_reg(struct mpam_msc *msc, u16 reg,
>>   
>>   static int __mpam_write_reg(struct mpam_msc *msc, u16 reg, u32 val)
>>   {
>> -	WARN_ON_ONCE(reg + sizeof(u32) > msc->mapped_hwpage_sz);
>>   	WARN_ON_ONCE(!cpumask_test_cpu(smp_processor_id(), &msc->accessibility));
>>   
>> +	if (msc->iface == MPAM_IFACE_PCC)
>> +		return mpam_fb_send_write_request(msc, reg, val);
>> +
>> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(reg + sizeof(u32) > msc->mapped_hwpage_sz);
>>   	writel_relaxed(val, msc->mapped_hwpage + reg);
>>   
>>   	return 0;
>> @@ -1127,7 +1134,8 @@ static u64 mpam_msc_read_mbwu_l(struct mpam_msc *msc)
>>   
>>   	mpam_mon_sel_lock_held(msc);
>>   
>> -	WARN_ON_ONCE((MSMON_MBWU_L + sizeof(u64)) > msc->mapped_hwpage_sz);
>> +	if (msc->iface == MPAM_IFACE_MMIO)
>> +		WARN_ON_ONCE((MSMON_MBWU_L + sizeof(u64)) > msc->mapped_hwpage_sz);
>>   	WARN_ON_ONCE(!cpumask_test_cpu(smp_processor_id(), &msc->accessibility));
>>   
>>   	ret = __mpam_read_reg(msc, MSMON_MBWU_L + 4, &mbwu_l_high2);
>> @@ -1475,9 +1483,15 @@ static int _msmon_read(struct mpam_component *comp, struct mon_read *arg)
>>   					 srcu_read_lock_held(&mpam_srcu)) {
>>   			arg->ris = ris;
>>   
>> -			err = smp_call_function_any(&msc->accessibility,
>> -						    __ris_msmon_read, arg,
>> -						    true);
>> +			if (msc->iface == MPAM_IFACE_MMIO) {
>> +				err = smp_call_function_any(&msc->accessibility,
>> +							    __ris_msmon_read,
>> +							    arg, true);
>> +			} else {
>> +				__ris_msmon_read(arg);
>> +				err = 0;
>> +			}
>> +
>>   			if (!err && arg->err)
>>   				err = arg->err;
>>   
>> @@ -1913,6 +1927,9 @@ static int mpam_get_msc_preferred_cpu(struct mpam_msc *msc)
>>   
>>   static int mpam_touch_msc(struct mpam_msc *msc, int (*fn)(void *a), void *arg)
>>   {
>> +	if (msc->iface != MPAM_IFACE_MMIO)
>> +		return fn(arg);
>> +
>>   	lockdep_assert_irqs_enabled();
>>   	lockdep_assert_cpus_held();
>>   	WARN_ON_ONCE(!srcu_read_lock_held((&mpam_srcu)));
>> diff --git a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_fb.c b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_fb.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..687be6f8a152
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_fb.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +// Copyright (C) 2024 Arm Ltd.
>> +
>> +#include <linux/arm_mpam.h>
>> +#include <linux/cleanup.h>
>> +#include <linux/device.h>
>> +#include <linux/errno.h>
>> +#include <linux/gfp.h>
>> +#include <linux/list.h>
>> +#include <linux/mailbox_client.h>
>> +#include <linux/mutex.h>
>> +#include <linux/of.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/printk.h>
>> +#include <linux/processor.h>
>> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>> +#include <linux/spinlock.h>
>> +#include <linux/types.h>
>> +
>> +#include <acpi/pcc.h>
>> +
>> +#include <asm/mpam.h>
>> +
>> +#include "mpam_fb.h"
>> +
>> +#define MPAM_FB_PROTOCOL_ID	0x1a
>> +#define MPAM_MSC_ATTRIBUTES_CMD	0x3
>> +#define MPAM_MSC_READ_CMD	0x4
>> +#define MPAM_MSC_WRITE_CMD	0x5
>> +
>> +#define MPAM_MSC_PROT_ID_MASK	GENMASK(17, 10)
>> +#define MPAM_MSC_TOKEN_MASK	GENMASK(27, 18)
>> +
>> +#define PCC_CHAN_FLAGS_IRQ	BIT(0)
> 
> 
>> +#define MPAM_READ_MSG_SIZE	(PCC_TYPE3_MSG_PAYLOAD_OFS + 3 * sizeof(u32))
> 
> How about packed structs for the msgs to avoid the magic numbers?
> Something like:
> struct mpam_fb_read_msg {
> 	uint32_t read;
> 	uint32_t flags;
> 	uint32_t offset;
> } __packed;

Well, the "magic numbers" are actually the reference, in the 
specification, so hiding them away in a C struct is not necessarily the 
best solution. But since we use a struct already for the generic PCC 
header, I will follow suit here.

 >
>> +#define MPAM_WRITE_MSG_SIZE	(PCC_TYPE3_MSG_PAYLOAD_OFS + 4 * sizeof(u32))>> +
>> +static atomic_t mpam_fb_token = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
>> +
>> +static int mpam_fb_build_read_message(int msc_id, int reg, unsigned int token,
>> +				      void __iomem *msg_buf)
>> +{
>> +	struct acpi_pcct_ext_pcc_shared_memory *pcc_shmem = msg_buf;
>> +	void __iomem *payload_ofs = msg_buf + sizeof(*pcc_shmem);
> 
> What about pcc_shmem->signature?

Do you mean why it's not populated? According to the ACPI spec v6.6, 
14.3 "Extended PCC Subspace Shared Memory Region":
"The signature is populated by the platform and is verified by OSPM."

>> +
>> +	writel_relaxed(PCC_CHAN_FLAGS_IRQ, &pcc_shmem->flags);
> 
> Based on the acpi spec, this can be ignored if a platform interrupt is
> not set in PCCT global flags. Do we rely on the interrupt?

No, we actually leave that to PCC to decide, so we should probably not 
set it here. I will clear it.

> 
>> +	writel_relaxed(MPAM_READ_MSG_SIZE, &pcc_shmem->length);
>> +	writel_relaxed(MPAM_MSC_READ_CMD |
>> +		       FIELD_PREP(MPAM_MSC_TOKEN_MASK, token) |
>> +		       FIELD_PREP(MPAM_MSC_PROT_ID_MASK, MPAM_FB_PROTOCOL_ID),
>> +		       &pcc_shmem->command);
>> +
>> +	writel_relaxed(cpu_to_le32(msc_id), payload_ofs + 0x0);
> 
> Why cpu_to_le32() here? writel_relaxed() looks to already do this?

Ah yeah, of course, thanks for spotting!

> 
>> +	writel_relaxed(0, payload_ofs + 0x4);
>> +	writel_relaxed(cpu_to_le32(reg), payload_ofs + 0x8);
> 
> Does memcpy_toio() work here to reduce the number of repeated calls to
> writel_relaxed()?

Not sure it makes too much sense to first fill a struct with the value, 
and then memcpy_toio()ing the data?
With using the struct members as targets it's more readable already, I 
think, so I'd prefer to stick to the writel's.

> 
>> +
>> +	return MPAM_READ_MSG_SIZE;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int mpam_fb_build_write_message(int msc_id, int reg, u32 val,
>> +				       unsigned int token,
>> +				       void __iomem *msg_buf)
>> +{
>> +	struct acpi_pcct_ext_pcc_shared_memory *pcc_shmem = msg_buf;
>> +	void __iomem *payload_ofs = msg_buf + sizeof(*pcc_shmem);
>> +
>> +	writel_relaxed(MPAM_WRITE_MSG_SIZE, &pcc_shmem->length);
>> +	writel_relaxed(MPAM_MSC_WRITE_CMD |
>> +		       FIELD_PREP(MPAM_MSC_TOKEN_MASK, token) |
>> +		       FIELD_PREP(MPAM_MSC_PROT_ID_MASK, MPAM_FB_PROTOCOL_ID),
>> +		       &pcc_shmem->command);
>> +
>> +	writel_relaxed(cpu_to_le32(msc_id), payload_ofs + 0x0);
>> +	writel_relaxed(0, payload_ofs + 0x4);
>> +	writel_relaxed(cpu_to_le32(reg), payload_ofs + 0x8);
>> +	writel_relaxed(cpu_to_le32(val), payload_ofs + 0xc);
>> +
>> +	return MPAM_WRITE_MSG_SIZE;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int mpam_fb_send_request(struct mpam_msc *msc, u16 reg, u32 *result,
>> +				bool is_write)
>> +{
>> +	unsigned int token = atomic_inc_return(&mpam_fb_token);
>> +	struct acpi_pcct_ext_pcc_shared_memory *pcc_shmem;
>> +	struct mpam_pcc_chan *pcc_chan = msc->pcc_chan;
>> +	struct pcc_mbox_chan *chan;
>> +	void __iomem *payload_ofs;
>> +	u32 status;
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	if (!pcc_chan)
>> +		return -ENODEV;
>> +
>> +	chan = pcc_chan->pcc_chan;
>> +
>> +	guard(mutex)(&pcc_chan->pcc_chan_lock);
>> +
>> +	if (is_write)
>> +		ret = mpam_fb_build_write_message(msc->mpam_fb_msc_id, reg,
>> +						  *result, token, chan->shmem);
>> +	else
>> +		ret = mpam_fb_build_read_message(msc->mpam_fb_msc_id, reg,
>> +						 token, chan->shmem);
>> +	if (ret < 0)
>> +		return ret;
>> +
>> +	ret = mbox_send_message(chan->mchan, NULL);
>> +	if (ret < 0)
>> +		return ret;
>> +
>> +	pcc_shmem = chan->shmem;
>> +	payload_ofs = chan->shmem + sizeof(*pcc_shmem);
>> +	status = readl(&pcc_shmem->command);
>> +	if (FIELD_GET(MPAM_MSC_TOKEN_MASK, status) != token)
>> +		return -ETIMEDOUT;
>> +
>> +	ret = readl(payload_ofs + 0x0);
>> +	if (ret < 0)
>> +		return ret;
> 
> This needs translating from an MPAM-FB error code to a kernel error code.

Ah, right.

>> +
>> +	if (!is_write)
>> +		*result = readl(payload_ofs + 0x4);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int mpam_fb_send_read_request(struct mpam_msc *msc, u16 reg, u32 *result)
>> +{
>> +	return mpam_fb_send_request(msc, reg, result, false);
>> +}
>> +
>> +int mpam_fb_send_write_request(struct mpam_msc *msc, u16 reg, u32 value)
>> +{
>> +	return mpam_fb_send_request(msc, reg, &value, true);
>> +}
>> diff --git a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_fb.h b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_fb.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..45cd572a28ad
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_fb.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
>> +// Copyright (C) 2024-2025 Arm Ltd.
>> +
>> +#ifndef MPAM_FB_H_
>> +#define MPAM_FB_H_
>> +
>> +#include <linux/types.h>
>> +#include "mpam_internal.h"
>> +
>> +#define PCC_TYPE3_MSG_PAYLOAD_OFS	0x10
>> +#define MPAM_WRITE_MSG_SIZE	(PCC_TYPE3_MSG_PAYLOAD_OFS + 4 * sizeof(u32))
>> +#define MPAM_FB_MAX_MSG_SIZE	MPAM_WRITE_MSG_SIZE
> 
> Duplicates of those in mpam_fb.c

Yes, on purpose. We need that value in mpam_devices.c, just for a safey 
check, but I didn't want to break abstraction by allowing MPAM-Fb 
specifics to bleed into the generic MPAM code.
  >> +
>> +int mpam_fb_send_read_request(struct mpam_msc *msc, u16 reg, u32 *result);
>> +int mpam_fb_send_write_request(struct mpam_msc *msc, u16 reg, u32 value);
> 
> These 2 declarations can just go in mpam_internal.h and get rid of the
> extra header.

Indeed, good idea!

Cheers,
Andre

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ben
> 
>> +
>> +#endif
>> diff --git a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h
>> index 4616f1283f1a..9e7778534143 100644
>> --- a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h
>> +++ b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h
>> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
>>   #include <linux/io.h>
>>   #include <linux/jump_label.h>
>>   #include <linux/llist.h>
>> +#include <linux/mailbox_client.h>
>>   #include <linux/mutex.h>
>>   #include <linux/resctrl.h>
>>   #include <linux/spinlock.h>
>> @@ -57,6 +58,15 @@ struct mpam_garbage {
>>   	struct platform_device	*pdev;
>>   };
>>   
>> +struct mpam_pcc_chan {
>> +	struct list_head	pcc_chans;
>> +	struct mbox_client	pcc_cl;
>> +	struct pcc_mbox_chan	*pcc_chan;
>> +	struct mutex		pcc_chan_lock; /* only one message at a time */
>> +	int			subspace_id;
>> +	int			refcount;
>> +};
>> +
>>   struct mpam_msc {
>>   	/* member of mpam_all_msc */
>>   	struct list_head	all_msc_list;
>> @@ -66,6 +76,8 @@ struct mpam_msc {
>>   
>>   	/* Not modified after mpam_is_enabled() becomes true */
>>   	enum mpam_msc_iface	iface;
>> +	struct mpam_pcc_chan	*pcc_chan;
>> +	int			mpam_fb_msc_id;	/* in its own name space */
>>   	u32			nrdy_usec;
>>   	cpumask_t		accessibility;
>>   	bool			has_extd_esr;
>> diff --git a/include/linux/arm_mpam.h b/include/linux/arm_mpam.h
>> index f92a36187a52..002f56e15362 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/arm_mpam.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/arm_mpam.h
>> @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ struct mpam_msc;
>>   
>>   enum mpam_msc_iface {
>>   	MPAM_IFACE_MMIO,	/* a real MPAM MSC */
>> -	MPAM_IFACE_PCC,		/* a fake MPAM MSC */
>> +	MPAM_IFACE_PCC,		/* using the MPAM-Fb firmware redirection */
>>   };
>>   
>>   enum mpam_class_types {
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-09 21:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-02 16:22 [PATCH v2 00/15] arm_mpam: Add MPAM-Fb firmware support Andre Przywara
2026-07-02 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 01/15] arm_mpam: let low level MSC read accessors return an error Andre Przywara
2026-07-02 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 02/15] arm_mpam: propagate MSC read errors for wrapper functions Andre Przywara
2026-07-01 19:56   ` Ben Horgan
2026-07-09  7:34     ` Andre Przywara
2026-07-02 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 03/15] arm_mpam: propagate MSC read errors for hw_probe functions Andre Przywara
2026-07-01 20:00   ` Ben Horgan
2026-07-09  7:35     ` Andre Przywara
2026-07-02 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 04/15] arm_mpam: propagate MSC read errors for mpam_msc_read_mbwu_l() Andre Przywara
2026-07-01 20:06   ` Ben Horgan
2026-07-09  7:36     ` Andre Przywara
2026-07-09  8:42       ` Ben Horgan
2026-07-02 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 05/15] arm_mpam: propagate MSC read errors for msmon helpers Andre Przywara
2026-07-02 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 06/15] arm_mpam: propagate MSC read errors for __ris_msmon_read() Andre Przywara
2026-07-01 20:14   ` Ben Horgan
2026-07-09  7:43     ` Andre Przywara
2026-07-02 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 07/15] arm_mpam: propagate MSC read errors for state saving functions Andre Przywara
2026-07-01 20:19   ` Ben Horgan
2026-07-09 10:03     ` Andre Przywara
2026-07-02 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 08/15] arm_mpam: let low level MSC write accessors return an error Andre Przywara
2026-07-02 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 09/15] arm_mpam: propagate MSC write errors for ESR and part_sel wrappers Andre Przywara
2026-07-02 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 10/15] arm_mpam: propagate MSC write errors for hardware probe functions Andre Przywara
2026-07-02 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 11/15] arm_mpam: propagate MSC write errors for remaining MSC write users Andre Przywara
2026-07-02 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 12/15] arm_mpam: Split the locking around the mon_sel registers Andre Przywara
2026-07-01 21:01   ` Ben Horgan
2026-07-02 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 13/15] arm_mpam: add MPAM-Fb MSC firmware access support Andre Przywara
2026-07-08 11:21   ` Ben Horgan
2026-07-09 21:54     ` Andre Przywara [this message]
2026-07-02 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 14/15] arm_mpam: prevent MPAM-Fb accesses inside IRQ handler Andre Przywara
2026-07-03 10:54   ` Ben Horgan
2026-07-09 12:06     ` Andre Przywara
2026-07-09 13:27       ` Ben Horgan
2026-07-02 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 15/15] arm_mpam: detect and enable MPAM-Fb PCC support Andre Przywara
2026-07-03 11:00   ` Ben Horgan
2026-07-09  9:42     ` Ben Horgan
2026-07-09 13:53     ` Andre Przywara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a3064c25-9a82-47e4-acff-7ec63b08bd11@arm.com \
    --to=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=ben.horgan@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=fenghuay@nvidia.com \
    --cc=ganapatrao.kulkarni@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=niyas.sait@arm.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=sramana@qti.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=srivathsa.rao@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@kernel.org \
    --cc=tsoni@quicinc.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox