From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, peterz@infradead.org,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, ldv@strace.io, song@kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org,
kees@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kmal@cock.li, thuth@redhat.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com,
anshuman.khandual@arm.com, kevin.brodsky@arm.com,
charlie@rivosinc.com, pengcan@kylinos.cn, broonie@kernel.org,
luto@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, richard.weiyang@gmail.com,
dvyukov@google.com, wad@chromium.org, oleg@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, liqiang01@kylinos.cn,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, reddybalavignesh9979@gmail.com,
macro@orcam.me.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 04/16] arm64/ptrace: Refactor syscall_trace_enter/exit()
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2026 16:42:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aXeZdh3CtznU8u6L@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251222114737.1334364-5-ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
On Mon, Dec 22, 2025 at 07:47:25PM +0800, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
> The generic syscall entry code has the following form, which use
> the input syscall work flag and syscall number:
>
> | syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs, long syscall,
> | unsigned long work)
> |
> | syscall_exit_work(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long work)
>
> In preparation for moving arm64 over to the generic entry code,
> refactor syscall_trace_enter/exit() to also pass thread flags, and
> get syscall number by syscall_get_nr() helper.
>
> No functional changes.
>
> Reviewed-by: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall.h | 4 ++--
> arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++---------
> arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c | 5 +++--
> 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall.h
> index 5e4c7fc44f73..cef1d9ce6e1b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall.h
> @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ static inline int syscall_get_arch(struct task_struct *task)
> return AUDIT_ARCH_AARCH64;
> }
>
> -int syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs);
> -void syscall_trace_exit(struct pt_regs *regs);
> +int syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs, long syscall, unsigned long flags);
> +void syscall_trace_exit(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long flags);
>
> #endif /* __ASM_SYSCALL_H */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
> index f333791ffba6..79762ff33945 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
> @@ -2407,9 +2407,8 @@ static void report_syscall_exit(struct pt_regs *regs)
> }
> }
>
> -int syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs)
> +int syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs, long syscall, unsigned long flags)
> {
> - unsigned long flags = read_thread_flags();
> int ret;
>
> if (flags & (_TIF_SYSCALL_EMU | _TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE)) {
> @@ -2422,19 +2421,27 @@ int syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs)
> if (secure_computing() == -1)
> return NO_SYSCALL;
>
> - if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT))
> - trace_sys_enter(regs, regs->syscallno);
> + /* Either of the above might have changed the syscall number */
> + syscall = syscall_get_nr(current, regs);
I understand that you're gradually making the arch code more similar to
the core code so that we can switch over to it, but I'm struggling to
understand why syscall_trace_enter() takes the 'syscall' argument.
Even the core code just seems to use it as a local variable, which it
overrides before it ever uses it. What am I missing?
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-26 16:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-22 11:47 [PATCH v10 00/16] arm64: entry: Convert to Generic Entry Jinjie Ruan
2025-12-22 11:47 ` [PATCH v10 01/16] arm64: Remove unused _TIF_WORK_MASK Jinjie Ruan
2025-12-22 11:47 ` [PATCH v10 02/16] arm64/ptrace: Split report_syscall() Jinjie Ruan
2025-12-22 11:47 ` [PATCH v10 03/16] arm64/ptrace: Return early for ptrace_report_syscall_entry() error Jinjie Ruan
2025-12-22 11:47 ` [PATCH v10 04/16] arm64/ptrace: Refactor syscall_trace_enter/exit() Jinjie Ruan
2026-01-26 16:42 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2026-01-27 3:01 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-01-27 9:43 ` Kevin Brodsky
2026-01-27 11:02 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-01-27 14:54 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-12-22 11:47 ` [PATCH v10 05/16] arm64: ptrace: Move rseq_syscall() before audit_syscall_exit() Jinjie Ruan
2026-01-26 19:02 ` Will Deacon
2026-01-27 9:44 ` Kevin Brodsky
2026-01-27 11:34 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-01-27 15:06 ` Kevin Brodsky
2026-01-28 1:09 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-01-28 14:53 ` Kevin Brodsky
2026-01-29 3:50 ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-12-22 11:47 ` [PATCH v10 06/16] arm64: syscall: Rework el0_svc_common() Jinjie Ruan
2025-12-22 11:47 ` [PATCH v10 07/16] arm64/ptrace: Not check _TIF_SECCOMP/SYSCALL_EMU for syscall_exit_work() Jinjie Ruan
2025-12-22 11:47 ` [PATCH v10 08/16] arm64/ptrace: Do not report_syscall_exit() for PTRACE_SYSEMU_SINGLESTEP Jinjie Ruan
2025-12-22 11:47 ` [PATCH v10 09/16] arm64/ptrace: Expand secure_computing() in place Jinjie Ruan
2025-12-22 11:47 ` [PATCH v10 10/16] arm64/ptrace: Use syscall_get_arguments() helper Jinjie Ruan
2025-12-22 11:47 ` [PATCH v10 11/16] entry: Split syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work() for arch reuse Jinjie Ruan
2025-12-29 18:03 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-12-31 1:35 ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-12-22 11:47 ` [PATCH v10 12/16] entry: Add arch_ptrace_report_syscall_entry/exit() Jinjie Ruan
2025-12-22 11:47 ` [PATCH v10 13/16] arm64: entry: Convert to generic entry Jinjie Ruan
2025-12-22 11:47 ` [PATCH v10 14/16] arm64: Inline el0_svc_common() Jinjie Ruan
2025-12-22 11:47 ` [PATCH v10 15/16] entry: Inline syscall_exit_work() and syscall_trace_enter() Jinjie Ruan
2025-12-22 11:47 ` [PATCH v10 16/16] selftests: sud_test: Support aarch64 Jinjie Ruan
2026-01-19 2:02 ` [PATCH v10 00/16] arm64: entry: Convert to Generic Entry Jinjie Ruan
2026-01-27 11:39 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aXeZdh3CtznU8u6L@willie-the-truck \
--to=will@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=charlie@rivosinc.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
--cc=kmal@cock.li \
--cc=ldv@strace.io \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liqiang01@kylinos.cn \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=macro@orcam.me.uk \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=pengcan@kylinos.cn \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=reddybalavignesh9979@gmail.com \
--cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=wad@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox