* [PATCH net] net: airoha: Fix TX scheduler queue mask loop upper bound
@ 2026-06-17 3:20 Wayen Yan
2026-06-17 7:10 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-06-17 8:55 ` Wayen Yan
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Wayen Yan @ 2026-06-17 3:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev
Cc: lorenzo, horms, pabeni, kuba, edumazet, andrew+netdev,
angelogioacchino.delregno, matthias.bgg, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-mediatek
In airoha_qdma_set_chan_tx_sched(), the loop clearing queue mask was
using AIROHA_NUM_TX_RING (32) instead of AIROHA_NUM_QOS_QUEUES (8).
Each channel has 8 queues, and TXQ_DISABLE_CHAN_QUEUE_MASK(channel, i)
computes BIT(i + (channel * 8)). With i ranging 0..31, this causes:
- channel 0: clears bit 0..31 (all 4 channels) instead of 0..7
- channel 1: clears bit 8..31 (channels 1-3) instead of 8..15
- channel 2: clears bit 16..31 (channels 2-3) instead of 16..23
- channel 3: clears bit 24..31 (channel 3 only) - correct by accident
While BIT(32+) on arm64 produces 64-bit values truncated to 0 in u32
mask parameter, the loop still incorrectly clears queues within the
same channel beyond queue 7.
Fix by using AIROHA_NUM_QOS_QUEUES (8) as the loop upper bound.
Fixes: ef1ca9271313 ("net: airoha: Add sched HTB offload support")
Signed-off-by: Wayen Yan <win847@gmail.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.c
index 31cdb11cd7..a1eda13400 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.c
@@ -2217,7 +2217,7 @@ static int airoha_qdma_set_chan_tx_sched(struct net_device *dev,
struct airoha_gdm_port *port = netdev_priv(dev);
int i;
- for (i = 0; i < AIROHA_NUM_TX_RING; i++)
+ for (i = 0; i < AIROHA_NUM_QOS_QUEUES; i++)
airoha_qdma_clear(port->qdma, REG_QUEUE_CLOSE_CFG(channel),
TXQ_DISABLE_CHAN_QUEUE_MASK(channel, i));
--
2.51.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net] net: airoha: Fix TX scheduler queue mask loop upper bound
2026-06-17 3:20 [PATCH net] net: airoha: Fix TX scheduler queue mask loop upper bound Wayen Yan
@ 2026-06-17 7:10 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-06-17 8:55 ` Wayen Yan
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Lorenzo Bianconi @ 2026-06-17 7:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wayen Yan
Cc: netdev, horms, pabeni, kuba, edumazet, andrew+netdev,
angelogioacchino.delregno, matthias.bgg, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-mediatek
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1940 bytes --]
> In airoha_qdma_set_chan_tx_sched(), the loop clearing queue mask was
> using AIROHA_NUM_TX_RING (32) instead of AIROHA_NUM_QOS_QUEUES (8).
>
> Each channel has 8 queues, and TXQ_DISABLE_CHAN_QUEUE_MASK(channel, i)
> computes BIT(i + (channel * 8)). With i ranging 0..31, this causes:
> - channel 0: clears bit 0..31 (all 4 channels) instead of 0..7
> - channel 1: clears bit 8..31 (channels 1-3) instead of 8..15
> - channel 2: clears bit 16..31 (channels 2-3) instead of 16..23
> - channel 3: clears bit 24..31 (channel 3 only) - correct by accident
>
> While BIT(32+) on arm64 produces 64-bit values truncated to 0 in u32
> mask parameter, the loop still incorrectly clears queues within the
> same channel beyond queue 7.
>
> Fix by using AIROHA_NUM_QOS_QUEUES (8) as the loop upper bound.
>
> Fixes: ef1ca9271313 ("net: airoha: Add sched HTB offload support")
> Signed-off-by: Wayen Yan <win847@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.c
> index 31cdb11cd7..a1eda13400 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.c
> @@ -2217,7 +2217,7 @@ static int airoha_qdma_set_chan_tx_sched(struct net_device *dev,
> struct airoha_gdm_port *port = netdev_priv(dev);
> int i;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < AIROHA_NUM_TX_RING; i++)
> + for (i = 0; i < AIROHA_NUM_QOS_QUEUES; i++)
> airoha_qdma_clear(port->qdma, REG_QUEUE_CLOSE_CFG(channel),
> TXQ_DISABLE_CHAN_QUEUE_MASK(channel, i));
Even if the current codebase supports just AIROHA_NUM_QOS_CHANNEL (4), the hw
exposes 32 hw QoS channels (AIROHA_NUM_TX_RING). Here we are just clearing the
configuration, so I guess the current implementation is correct.
Regards,
Lorenzo
>
> --
> 2.51.0
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net] net: airoha: Fix TX scheduler queue mask loop upper bound
2026-06-17 3:20 [PATCH net] net: airoha: Fix TX scheduler queue mask loop upper bound Wayen Yan
2026-06-17 7:10 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
@ 2026-06-17 8:55 ` Wayen Yan
2026-06-17 9:17 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Wayen Yan @ 2026-06-17 8:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lorenzo; +Cc: netdev, nbd, linux-arm-kernel, linux-mediatek
On Tue, Jun 17, 2026, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> Even if the current codebase supports just AIROHA_NUM_QOS_CHANNEL (4), the hw
> exposes 32 hw QoS channels (AIROHA_NUM_TX_RING). Here we are just clearing the
> configuration, so I guess the current implementation is correct.
Hi Lorenzo,
You are right that there is no functional impact, and I agree this
should not go to net. Let me explain the register layout I was worried
about, and you can decide whether it is worth a net-next cleanup or
should just be dropped.
The two macros are:
REG_QUEUE_CLOSE_CFG(_n) = 0x00a0 + ((_n) & 0xfc)
TXQ_DISABLE_CHAN_QUEUE_MASK(_n, _m) = BIT((_m) + (((_n) & 0x3) << 3))
REG_QUEUE_CLOSE_CFG() masks the channel with 0xfc, and the bit macro
folds the channel with & 0x3 (mod 4) shifted by 3. So one 32-bit
register holds 4 channels x 8 queues, 8 queue bits per channel:
channel 0 -> reg 0x00a0, bits 0..7
channel 1 -> reg 0x00a0, bits 8..15
channel 2 -> reg 0x00a0, bits 16..23
channel 3 -> reg 0x00a0, bits 24..31
channel 4 -> reg 0x00a4, bits 0..7
...
In airoha_qdma_set_chan_tx_sched() the loop variable 'i' is passed as
the *queue* argument _m, not as a channel:
for (i = 0; i < AIROHA_NUM_TX_RING; i++) // i = 0..31
airoha_qdma_clear(qdma, REG_QUEUE_CLOSE_CFG(channel),
TXQ_DISABLE_CHAN_QUEUE_MASK(channel, i));
Since each channel only has AIROHA_NUM_QOS_QUEUES (8) queues, the correct
logic is to clear the 8 queue bits belonging to 'channel'. With i running
up to 31 the BIT() shift instead walks past those 8 bits and into the bit
ranges of the other channels folded into the same register. For channel 0
the accumulated mask becomes 0xffffffff, i.e. it touches channels 1..3 as
well.
This is harmless today only because REG_QUEUE_CLOSE_CFG is written
exclusively here, via airoha_qdma_clear() (RMW clear), and the register
resets to 0 and is never set anywhere -- so clearing extra bits is a
no-op. Functionally the current code is fine, as you say.
The point is just the loop-bound semantics: 'i' is a per-channel queue
index, so the bound should be AIROHA_NUM_QOS_QUEUES (8), not
AIROHA_NUM_TX_RING (32). The two happen to be related (32 == 4 channels *
8 queues) but mean different things.
Since there is no functional change, feel free to drop this if you would
rather not carry a cosmetic patch. If you think the clarity is worth it I
can resend against net-next without the Fixes tag.
Thanks,
Wayen
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net] net: airoha: Fix TX scheduler queue mask loop upper bound
2026-06-17 8:55 ` Wayen Yan
@ 2026-06-17 9:17 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Lorenzo Bianconi @ 2026-06-17 9:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wayen Yan; +Cc: netdev, nbd, linux-arm-kernel, linux-mediatek
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2931 bytes --]
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2026, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > Even if the current codebase supports just AIROHA_NUM_QOS_CHANNEL (4), the hw
> > exposes 32 hw QoS channels (AIROHA_NUM_TX_RING). Here we are just clearing the
> > configuration, so I guess the current implementation is correct.
>
> Hi Lorenzo,
>
> You are right that there is no functional impact, and I agree this
> should not go to net. Let me explain the register layout I was worried
> about, and you can decide whether it is worth a net-next cleanup or
> should just be dropped.
>
> The two macros are:
>
> REG_QUEUE_CLOSE_CFG(_n) = 0x00a0 + ((_n) & 0xfc)
> TXQ_DISABLE_CHAN_QUEUE_MASK(_n, _m) = BIT((_m) + (((_n) & 0x3) << 3))
>
> REG_QUEUE_CLOSE_CFG() masks the channel with 0xfc, and the bit macro
> folds the channel with & 0x3 (mod 4) shifted by 3. So one 32-bit
> register holds 4 channels x 8 queues, 8 queue bits per channel:
>
> channel 0 -> reg 0x00a0, bits 0..7
> channel 1 -> reg 0x00a0, bits 8..15
> channel 2 -> reg 0x00a0, bits 16..23
> channel 3 -> reg 0x00a0, bits 24..31
> channel 4 -> reg 0x00a4, bits 0..7
> ...
>
> In airoha_qdma_set_chan_tx_sched() the loop variable 'i' is passed as
> the *queue* argument _m, not as a channel:
>
> for (i = 0; i < AIROHA_NUM_TX_RING; i++) // i = 0..31
> airoha_qdma_clear(qdma, REG_QUEUE_CLOSE_CFG(channel),
> TXQ_DISABLE_CHAN_QUEUE_MASK(channel, i));
>
> Since each channel only has AIROHA_NUM_QOS_QUEUES (8) queues, the correct
> logic is to clear the 8 queue bits belonging to 'channel'. With i running
> up to 31 the BIT() shift instead walks past those 8 bits and into the bit
> ranges of the other channels folded into the same register. For channel 0
> the accumulated mask becomes 0xffffffff, i.e. it touches channels 1..3 as
> well.
>
> This is harmless today only because REG_QUEUE_CLOSE_CFG is written
> exclusively here, via airoha_qdma_clear() (RMW clear), and the register
> resets to 0 and is never set anywhere -- so clearing extra bits is a
> no-op. Functionally the current code is fine, as you say.
>
> The point is just the loop-bound semantics: 'i' is a per-channel queue
> index, so the bound should be AIROHA_NUM_QOS_QUEUES (8), not
> AIROHA_NUM_TX_RING (32). The two happen to be related (32 == 4 channels *
> 8 queues) but mean different things.
>
> Since there is no functional change, feel free to drop this if you would
> rather not carry a cosmetic patch. If you think the clarity is worth it I
> can resend against net-next without the Fixes tag.
>
> Thanks,
> Wayen
>
Sorry you are right, I misread the code, your patch is correct. Since as you
pointed out REG_QUEUE_CLOSE_CFG() is actually never set at the moment and the
default register value is 0, I would repost this patch for net-next as soon as
it is opened (this will avoid merge conflicts).
Regards,
Lorenzo
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-06-17 9:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-06-17 3:20 [PATCH net] net: airoha: Fix TX scheduler queue mask loop upper bound Wayen Yan
2026-06-17 7:10 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-06-17 8:55 ` Wayen Yan
2026-06-17 9:17 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox