From: Leonardo Bras <leo.bras@arm.com>
To: Tian Zheng <zhengtian10@huawei.com>
Cc: Leonardo Bras <leo.bras@arm.com>,
maz@kernel.org, oupton@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
will@kernel.org, yuzenghui@huawei.com, wangzhou1@hisilicon.com,
yangjinqian1@huawei.com, caijian11@h-partners.com,
liuyonglong@huawei.com, yezhenyu2@huawei.com,
yubihong@huawei.com, linuxarm@huawei.com, joey.gouly@arm.com,
kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, seiden@linux.ibm.com,
suzuki.poulose@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] KVM: arm64: Add HDBSS fault handling and buffer flush
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2026 15:19:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alZFVPkS3lgGdruc@LeoBrasDK> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fa0839f9-7d83-4ad1-80e2-7e7dd0280222@huawei.com>
On Tue, Jul 14, 2026 at 09:27:15PM +0800, Tian Zheng wrote:
>
> On 7/14/2026 6:50 PM, Leonardo Bras wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 14, 2026 at 03:38:39PM +0800, Tian Zheng wrote:
> > > On 7/13/2026 10:06 PM, Leonardo Bras wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jul 09, 2026 at 06:40:25PM +0800, Tian Zheng wrote:
> > > > > From: eillon <yezhenyu2@huawei.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > Add HDBSS fault handling for buffer full, external abort, and general
> > > > > protection fault (GPF) events. When the HDBSS buffer becomes full,
> > > > > the hardware traps to EL2 with an HDBSSF event, which is handled by
> > > > > setting a flush request.
> > > > >
> > > > > Add kvm_flush_hdbss_buffer() to consume HDBSS buffer entries and
> > > > > propagate dirty information into the userspace-visible dirty bitmap.
> > > > > Flush is triggered on vcpu_put, check_vcpu_requests, and
> > > > > sync_dirty_log.
> > > > >
> > > > > Add esr_iss2_is_hdbssf() helper for HDBSS fault detection in guest
> > > > > abort handling.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Eillon <yezhenyu2@huawei.com>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Tian Zheng <zhengtian10@huawei.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > arch/arm64/include/asm/esr.h | 5 +++
> > > > > arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_dirty_bit.h | 11 +++++
> > > > > arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 +
> > > > > arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 14 ++++++
> > > > > arch/arm64/kvm/dirty_bit.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c | 4 ++
> > > > > 6 files changed, 97 insertions(+)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/esr.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/esr.h
> > > > > index 81c17320a588..2e6b679b5908 100644
> > > > > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/esr.h
> > > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/esr.h
> > > > > @@ -437,6 +437,11 @@
> > > > > #ifndef __ASSEMBLER__
> > > > > #include <asm/types.h>
> > > > >
> > > > > +static inline bool esr_iss2_is_hdbssf(unsigned long esr)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + return ESR_ELx_ISS2(esr) & ESR_ELx_HDBSSF;
> > > > This will return a long, which will be casted as bool.
> > > > In general, what I see in the kernel is something like:
> > > >
> > > > return !!(ESR_ELx_ISS2(esr) & ESR_ELx_HDBSSF)
> > >
> > > ok!
> > >
> > >
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > > static inline unsigned long esr_brk_comment(unsigned long esr)
> > > > > {
> > > > > return esr & ESR_ELx_BRK64_ISS_COMMENT_MASK;
> > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_dirty_bit.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_dirty_bit.h
> > > > > index 84b12f0a10af..4b28000e972f 100644
> > > > > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_dirty_bit.h
> > > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_dirty_bit.h
> > > > > @@ -10,7 +10,18 @@
> > > > > #include <asm/kvm_pgtable.h>
> > > > > #include <asm/sysreg.h>
> > > > >
> > > > > +/* HDBSS entry field definitions */
> > > > > +#define HDBSS_ENTRY_VALID BIT(0)
> > > > > +#define HDBSS_ENTRY_TTWL_SHIFT (1)
> > > > > +#define HDBSS_ENTRY_TTWL_MASK (GENMASK(3, 1))
> > > > > +#define HDBSS_ENTRY_TTWL(x) \
> > > > > + (((x) << HDBSS_ENTRY_TTWL_SHIFT) & HDBSS_ENTRY_TTWL_MASK)
> > > > > +#define HDBSS_ENTRY_TTWL_RESV HDBSS_ENTRY_TTWL(-4)
> > > > > +#define HDBSS_ENTRY_IPA GENMASK_ULL(55, 12)
> > > > > +
> > > > > int kvm_arm_vcpu_alloc_hdbss(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int order);
> > > > > void kvm_arm_vcpu_free_hdbss(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> > > > > +void kvm_flush_hdbss_buffer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> > > > > +int kvm_handle_hdbss_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> > > > >
> > > > > #endif /* __ARM64_KVM_DIRTY_BIT_H__ */
> > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > > > > index c41ec6d9c45a..cecfb884a64f 100644
> > > > > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > > > > @@ -55,6 +55,7 @@
> > > > > #define KVM_REQ_GUEST_HYP_IRQ_PENDING KVM_ARCH_REQ(9)
> > > > > #define KVM_REQ_MAP_L1_VNCR_EL2 KVM_ARCH_REQ(10)
> > > > > #define KVM_REQ_VGIC_PROCESS_UPDATE KVM_ARCH_REQ(11)
> > > > > +#define KVM_REQ_FLUSH_HDBSS KVM_ARCH_REQ(12)
> > > > >
> > > > > #define KVM_DIRTY_LOG_MANUAL_CAPS (KVM_DIRTY_LOG_MANUAL_PROTECT_ENABLE | \
> > > > > KVM_DIRTY_LOG_INITIALLY_SET)
> > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> > > > > index bf6688245d83..566953a4e23a 100644
> > > > > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> > > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> > > > > @@ -755,6 +755,9 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_put(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > > > > kvm_vcpu_put_hw_mmu(vcpu);
> > > > > kvm_arm_vmid_clear_active();
> > > > >
> > > > > + if (vcpu->kvm->arch.enable_hdbss)
> > > > > + kvm_flush_hdbss_buffer(vcpu);
> > > > > +
> > > > > vcpu_clear_on_unsupported_cpu(vcpu);
> > > > > vcpu->cpu = -1;
> > > > > }
> > > > > @@ -1157,6 +1160,9 @@ static int check_vcpu_requests(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > > > > if (kvm_dirty_ring_check_request(vcpu))
> > > > > return 0;
> > > > >
> > > > > + if (kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_FLUSH_HDBSS, vcpu))
> > > > > + kvm_flush_hdbss_buffer(vcpu);
> > > > > +
> > > > > check_nested_vcpu_requests(vcpu);
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > @@ -1971,7 +1977,15 @@ long kvm_arch_vcpu_unlocked_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int ioctl,
> > > > >
> > > > > void kvm_arch_sync_dirty_log(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot)
> > > > > {
> > > > > + /*
> > > > > + * Flush all CPUs' dirty log buffers to the dirty_bitmap. Called
> > > > > + * before reporting dirty_bitmap to userspace. Send a request with
> > > > > + * KVM_REQUEST_WAIT to flush buffer synchronously.
> > > > > + */
> > > > > + if (!kvm->arch.enable_hdbss)
> > > > > + return;
> > > > >
> > > > > + kvm_make_all_cpus_request(kvm, KVM_REQ_FLUSH_HDBSS | KVM_REQUEST_WAIT);
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > static int kvm_vm_ioctl_set_device_addr(struct kvm *kvm,
> > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/dirty_bit.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/dirty_bit.c
> > > > > index 6c7a6ef66b5a..002366337637 100644
> > > > > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/dirty_bit.c
> > > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/dirty_bit.c
> > > > > @@ -50,3 +50,65 @@ void kvm_arm_vcpu_free_hdbss(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > > > >
> > > > > vcpu->arch.hdbss.hdbssbr_el2 = 0;
> > > > > }
> > > > > +
> > > > > +void kvm_flush_hdbss_buffer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + int idx, curr_idx;
> > > > > + u64 *hdbss_buf;
> > > > > + struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + if (!kvm->arch.enable_hdbss)
> > > > > + return;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + curr_idx = HDBSSPROD_IDX(read_sysreg_s(SYS_HDBSSPROD_EL2));
> > > > > +
> > > > > + /* Do nothing if HDBSS buffer is empty or br_el2 is NULL */
> > > > > + if (curr_idx == 0 || vcpu->arch.hdbss.hdbssbr_el2 == 0)
> > > > > + return;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + hdbss_buf = page_address(phys_to_page(vcpu->arch.hdbss.base_phys));
> > > > > + if (!hdbss_buf)
> > > > > + return;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + guard(write_lock_irqsave)(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
> > > > > + for (idx = 0; idx < curr_idx; idx++) {
> > > > > + u64 gpa;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + gpa = hdbss_buf[idx];
> > > > > + if (!(gpa & HDBSS_ENTRY_VALID))
> > > > > + continue;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + gpa &= HDBSS_ENTRY_IPA;
> > > > > + kvm_vcpu_mark_page_dirty(vcpu, gpa >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> > > > You mention that it does not support dirty-ring, but above function will
> > > > mark the page as dirty in the dirty-ring :/
> > > >
> > > In kvm_arm_enable_hdbss_global(), we explicitly check and reject HDBSS
> > > enablement if dirty-ring is active:
> > >
> > > ```
> > > if (kvm->dirty_ring_size)
> > > return 0;
> > > ```
> > >
> > > So when kvm_flush_hdbss_buffer() runs (which requires enable_hdbss = true),
> > > we know for certain that
> > >
> > > kvm->dirty_ring_size == 0. Therefore, kvm_vcpu_mark_page_dirty() will always
> > > take the dirty_bitmap path,
> > >
> > > never the dirty-ring path.
> > >
> > > That said, I'll add a comment in kvm_flush_hdbss_buffer() before dirty ring
> > > mode is supported, to make this explicit:
> > >
> > > ```
> > > /*
> > > * HDBSS is mutually exclusive with dirty-ring mode (see
> > > * kvm_arm_enable_hdbss_global()), so kvm_vcpu_mark_page_dirty()
> > > * will update the dirty_bitmap, not the dirty-ring.
> > > */
> > > ```
> > >
> > Got it :)
> >
> > Out of curiosity: which issues have you found on supporting dirty-ring at
> > this point?
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Leo
>
>
> I haven't looked deeply into dirty-ring yet — my main concern is that if
> both the dirty
>
> ring and HDBSS buffer fill up, the flush path might get blocked or
> complicated.
>
> For now, I'm planning to match the HDBSS buffer size to the dirty ring size
> in v5 and test it.
>
> Ideally, the two buffers would be the same size, and the entire dirty
> tracking path would use
>
Ah, I see the point.
IIRC, when dirty-ring gets full, the kernel returns to userspace with
run->exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_DIRTY_RING_FULL, which will warn the VMM to
drain the dirty-ring, and that makes space for us draining HDBSS to the
dirty-ring again.
The best way to achieve that, as I remember, is to always drain
HDBSS as much as possible at guest_exitting. That will make more space to
newer HDBSS entries, and we can get userspace to drain the dirty-ring
earlier.
I would say to even make HDBSS buffer half (entries) the dirty-ring. Then
we can generally fully drain to the dirty-ring and even report ring full
if the ring is above a given threshold percentage full.
> HDBSS exclusively — no fallback to the legacy dirty bitmap path. If that
> works, I think this approach should be fine.
>
> Let me know if you have any insights on dirty ring's full-buffer behavior —
> that would be helpful.
>
>
Will do!
Thanks!
Leo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-14 14:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-09 10:40 [PATCH v4 0/6] Support the FEAT_HDBSS introduced in Armv9.5 Tian Zheng
2026-07-09 10:40 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] KVM: arm64: Enable eager hugepage splitting if HDBSS is available Tian Zheng
2026-07-09 10:40 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] KVM: arm64: Add support for FEAT_HDBSS Tian Zheng
2026-07-09 10:40 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] KVM: arm64: Add auto DBM support for hardware dirty tracking Tian Zheng
2026-07-13 11:17 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-07-14 1:14 ` Tian Zheng
2026-07-14 7:23 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-14 7:44 ` Tian Zheng
2026-07-14 10:20 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-07-09 10:40 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] KVM: arm64: Add HDBSS per-vCPU buffer management Tian Zheng
2026-07-13 13:39 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-07-14 7:15 ` Tian Zheng
2026-07-14 10:47 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-07-09 10:40 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] KVM: arm64: Add HDBSS fault handling and buffer flush Tian Zheng
2026-07-13 14:06 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-07-14 7:38 ` Tian Zheng
2026-07-14 10:50 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-07-14 13:27 ` Tian Zheng
2026-07-14 14:19 ` Leonardo Bras [this message]
2026-07-09 10:40 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] KVM: arm64: Add auto HDBSS enable/disable on dirty logging change Tian Zheng
2026-07-13 14:50 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-07-14 8:58 ` Tian Zheng
2026-07-14 11:16 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-07-14 14:33 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-07-13 10:31 ` [PATCH v4 0/6] Support the FEAT_HDBSS introduced in Armv9.5 Leonardo Bras
2026-07-13 16:27 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-07-14 10:39 ` Tian Zheng
2026-07-14 11:20 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-07-14 13:29 ` Tian Zheng
2026-07-14 9:37 ` Tian Zheng
2026-07-14 10:19 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-07-14 13:34 ` Tian Zheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alZFVPkS3lgGdruc@LeoBrasDK \
--to=leo.bras@arm.com \
--cc=caijian11@h-partners.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=liuyonglong@huawei.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=wangzhou1@hisilicon.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yangjinqian1@huawei.com \
--cc=yezhenyu2@huawei.com \
--cc=yubihong@huawei.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
--cc=zhengtian10@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox