From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: vladimir.murzin@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
hca@linux.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ruanjinjie@huawei.com, yang@os.amperecomputing.com,
maz@kernel.org, will@kernel.org, ardb@kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 06/13] arm64: percpu: Add infrastructure for preemptible this_cpu_*() ops
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2026 14:23:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <anHntggSHNK28VYu@J2N7QTR9R3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260728164912.GK651302@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Tue, Jul 28, 2026 at 06:49:12PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2026 at 04:53:52PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
>
> > > > +#define ____PCPU_GPRS_BEGIN(gprs, pcp, off, addr) \
> > > > + __DEFINE_ASM_GPR_NUMS \
> > > > + __DEFINE_ASM_GPR_ALIASES \
> > > > + " mov w" off ", #" __VAL_PCPU_GPRS(pcp, off, addr) "\n" \
> > > > + " strh w" off ", " gprs "\n" \
> > > > + __KERN_ASM_CPU_OFFSET(off) "\n"
> > >
> > > Can this macro also generate a readable comment for those few of us
> > > building the .i file ?
> >
> > Do you mean for __VAL_PCPU_GPRS, or ____PCPU_GPRS_BEGIN() ?
>
> I was thinking BEGIN, but whatever is easiest, the __VAL thing is only
> ever used in BEGIN anyway.
>
> > I can happily add comments for either (and the corresponding ENDs).
>
> Not sure the comment makes sense for end, that's simply storing 0 and
> seems clear enough.
FWIW, for v2 I've added the following to ____PCPU_GPRS_BEGIN():
"// ____PCPU_GPRS_BEGIN(" gprs ", " pcp ", " off ", " addr")\n"
... which should make that easy to spot, and surfaces the exact
registers used.
Mark.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-04 13:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-28 12:38 [RFC PATCH 00/13] arm64: Preemptible this_cpu_*() operations Mark Rutland
2026-07-28 12:38 ` [RFC PATCH 01/13] arm64: preempt: Simplify and optimize __preempt_count_dec_and_test() Mark Rutland
2026-07-29 3:56 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-28 12:38 ` [RFC PATCH 02/13] arm64: preempt: Treat should_resched() as unlikely Mark Rutland
2026-07-29 4:00 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-28 12:38 ` [RFC PATCH 03/13] arm64: ptrace: Always inline pt_regs_[read,write}_reg() Mark Rutland
2026-07-29 4:02 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-28 12:38 ` [RFC PATCH 04/13] arm64: percpu: Factor out percpu offset asm Mark Rutland
2026-07-29 4:03 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-28 12:38 ` [RFC PATCH 05/13] arm64: gpr-num: Add wxN aliases for wN registers Mark Rutland
2026-07-28 12:38 ` [RFC PATCH 06/13] arm64: percpu: Add infrastructure for preemptible this_cpu_*() ops Mark Rutland
2026-07-28 14:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-07-28 14:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-07-28 16:03 ` Mark Rutland
2026-07-28 16:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-07-28 15:53 ` Mark Rutland
2026-07-28 16:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-07-28 16:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-04 13:23 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2026-07-28 16:51 ` Heiko Carstens
2026-07-29 8:16 ` Heiko Carstens
2026-07-29 14:25 ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-30 10:59 ` Mark Rutland
2026-07-30 12:04 ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-07-28 12:38 ` [RFC PATCH 07/13] arm64: percpu: Implement preemptible read/write ops Mark Rutland
2026-07-28 21:47 ` David Laight
2026-08-04 15:00 ` Mark Rutland
2026-07-28 22:05 ` David Laight
2026-08-04 15:05 ` Mark Rutland
2026-07-28 12:38 ` [RFC PATCH 08/13] arm64: percpu: Implement preemptible void RMW ops Mark Rutland
2026-07-28 12:38 ` [RFC PATCH 09/13] arm64: percpu: Implement preemptible return " Mark Rutland
2026-07-28 12:38 ` [RFC PATCH 10/13] arm64: percpu: Implement preemptible XCHG ops Mark Rutland
2026-07-28 12:38 ` [RFC PATCH 11/13] arm64: percpu: Implement preemptible CMPXCHG ops Mark Rutland
2026-07-28 12:38 ` [RFC PATCH 12/13] arm64: percpu: Implement preemptible CMPXCHG128 ops Mark Rutland
2026-07-28 12:38 ` [RFC PATCH 13/13] arm64: percpu: Remove _pcp_protect*() wrappers Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=anHntggSHNK28VYu@J2N7QTR9R3 \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
--cc=vladimir.murzin@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox