Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)" <ljs@kernel.org>
To: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
Cc: maz@kernel.org, oupton@kernel.org, fuad.tabba@linux.dev,
	 joey.gouly@arm.com, seiden@linux.ibm.com,
	suzuki.poulose@arm.com,  yuzenghui@huawei.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
	 will@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,  catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	james.clark@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v7 18/28] KVM: arm64: config: Use functions from spe.c to test FEAT_SPE_{FnE,FDS}
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2026 17:47:52 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <auOBFeXOmUYNHeAV@gremlin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260903160623.315525-19-alexandru.elisei@arm.com>

On Thu, Sep 03, 2026 at 05:06:13PM +0100, Alexandru Elisei wrote:
> KVM's FGU mechanism will trap the registers introduced by FEAT_SPE_FnE and
> FEAT_SPE_FDS if the feature is not present for the VM. Move the functions
> that check for the presence of these features out of config.c and into
> spe.c, since that's where the bulk of SPE virtualization lies.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>

Aside from naming nit below, LGTM and:

Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) <ljs@kernel.org>

> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_spe.h | 11 +++++++++++
>  arch/arm64/kvm/config.c          | 30 +++++-------------------------
>  arch/arm64/kvm/spe.c             | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_spe.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_spe.h
> index 3d8e9720daca..618051dcf59f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_spe.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_spe.h
> @@ -43,6 +43,9 @@ u8 kvm_spe_get_pmsver(struct kvm *kvm);
>
>  bool kvm_spe_write_sysreg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int reg, u64 val);
>  u64 kvm_spe_read_sysreg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int reg);
> +
> +bool kvm_spe_has_feat_spe_fne(struct kvm *kvm);
> +bool kvm_spe_has_feat_spe_fds(struct kvm *kvm);

These both say spe twice, can probably cut the 2nd one in each case I think
:) Could you drop the 'feat' too, kvm_spe_has_fne() and kvm_spe_has_fds()
seem better!

>  #else
>  struct kvm_spe {
>  };
> @@ -99,6 +102,14 @@ static inline u64 kvm_spe_read_sysreg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int reg)
>  {
>  	return 0;
>  }
> +static inline bool kvm_spe_has_feat_spe_fne(struct kvm *kvm)
> +{
> +	return false;
> +}
> +static inline bool kvm_spe_has_feat_spe_fds(struct kvm *kvm)
> +{
> +	return false;
> +}
>  #endif /* CONFIG_KVM_ARM_SPE */
>
>  #endif /* __ARM64_KVM_SPE_H__ */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/config.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/config.c
> index 1053676551af..78e414ed736d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/config.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/config.c
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
>  #include <linux/kvm_host.h>
>  #include <asm/kvm_emulate.h>
>  #include <asm/kvm_nested.h>
> +#include <asm/kvm_spe.h>
>  #include <asm/sysreg.h>
>
>  /*
> @@ -159,7 +160,6 @@ struct reg_feat_map_desc {
>  #define FEAT_GICv3		ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, GIC, IMP
>  #define FEAT_LOR		ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1, LO, IMP
>  #define FEAT_SPEv1p2		ID_AA64DFR0_EL1, PMSVer, V1P2
> -#define FEAT_SPEv1p4		ID_AA64DFR0_EL1, PMSVer, V1P4
>  #define FEAT_SPEv1p5		ID_AA64DFR0_EL1, PMSVer, V1P5
>  #define FEAT_ATS1A		ID_AA64ISAR2_EL1, ATS1A, IMP
>  #define FEAT_SPECRES2		ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1, SPECRES, COSP_RCTX
> @@ -292,26 +292,6 @@ static bool feat_sme_smps(struct kvm *kvm)
>  		(read_sysreg_s(SYS_SMIDR_EL1) & SMIDR_EL1_SMPS));
>  }
>
> -static bool feat_spe_fds(struct kvm *kvm)
> -{
> -	/*
> -	 * Revisit this if KVM ever supports SPE -- this really should
> -	 * look at the guest's view of PMSIDR_EL1.
> -	 */
> -	return (kvm_has_feat(kvm, FEAT_SPEv1p4) &&
> -		(read_sysreg_s(SYS_PMSIDR_EL1) & PMSIDR_EL1_FDS));
> -}
> -
> -static bool feat_spe_fne(struct kvm *kvm)
> -{
> -	/*
> -	 * Revisit this if KVM ever supports SPE -- this really should
> -	 * look at the guest's view of PMSIDR_EL1.
> -	 */
> -	return (kvm_has_feat(kvm, FEAT_SPEv1p2) &&
> -		(read_sysreg_s(SYS_PMSIDR_EL1) & PMSIDR_EL1_FnE));
> -}
> -
>  static bool feat_trbe_mpam(struct kvm *kvm)
>  {
>  	/*
> @@ -547,7 +527,7 @@ static const struct reg_bits_to_feat_map hdfgrtr_feat_map[] = {
>  		   HDFGRTR_EL2_PMBPTR_EL1	|
>  		   HDFGRTR_EL2_PMBLIMITR_EL1,
>  		   FEAT_SPE),
> -	NEEDS_FEAT(HDFGRTR_EL2_nPMSNEVFR_EL1, feat_spe_fne),
> +	NEEDS_FEAT(HDFGRTR_EL2_nPMSNEVFR_EL1, kvm_spe_has_feat_spe_fne),
>  	NEEDS_FEAT(HDFGRTR_EL2_nBRBDATA		|
>  		   HDFGRTR_EL2_nBRBCTL		|
>  		   HDFGRTR_EL2_nBRBIDR,
> @@ -615,7 +595,7 @@ static const struct reg_bits_to_feat_map hdfgwtr_feat_map[] = {
>  		   HDFGWTR_EL2_PMBPTR_EL1	|
>  		   HDFGWTR_EL2_PMBLIMITR_EL1,
>  		   FEAT_SPE),
> -	NEEDS_FEAT(HDFGWTR_EL2_nPMSNEVFR_EL1, feat_spe_fne),
> +	NEEDS_FEAT(HDFGWTR_EL2_nPMSNEVFR_EL1, kvm_spe_has_feat_spe_fne),
>  	NEEDS_FEAT(HDFGWTR_EL2_nBRBDATA		|
>  		   HDFGWTR_EL2_nBRBCTL,
>  		   FEAT_BRBE),
> @@ -851,7 +831,7 @@ static const struct reg_bits_to_feat_map hdfgrtr2_feat_map[] = {
>  		   HDFGRTR2_EL2_nPMSSDATA,
>  		   FEAT_PMUv3_SS),
>  	NEEDS_FEAT(HDFGRTR2_EL2_nPMIAR_EL1, FEAT_SEBEP),
> -	NEEDS_FEAT(HDFGRTR2_EL2_nPMSDSFR_EL1, feat_spe_fds),
> +	NEEDS_FEAT(HDFGRTR2_EL2_nPMSDSFR_EL1, kvm_spe_has_feat_spe_fds),
>  	NEEDS_FEAT(HDFGRTR2_EL2_nPMBMAR_EL1, FEAT_SPE_nVM),
>  	NEEDS_FEAT(HDFGRTR2_EL2_nSPMACCESSR_EL1	|
>  		   HDFGRTR2_EL2_nSPMCNTEN	|
> @@ -884,7 +864,7 @@ static const struct reg_bits_to_feat_map hdfgwtr2_feat_map[] = {
>  		   feat_pmuv3p9),
>  	NEEDS_FEAT(HDFGWTR2_EL2_nPMSSCR_EL1, FEAT_PMUv3_SS),
>  	NEEDS_FEAT(HDFGWTR2_EL2_nPMIAR_EL1, FEAT_SEBEP),
> -	NEEDS_FEAT(HDFGWTR2_EL2_nPMSDSFR_EL1, feat_spe_fds),
> +	NEEDS_FEAT(HDFGWTR2_EL2_nPMSDSFR_EL1, kvm_spe_has_feat_spe_fds),
>  	NEEDS_FEAT(HDFGWTR2_EL2_nPMBMAR_EL1, FEAT_SPE_nVM),
>  	NEEDS_FEAT(HDFGWTR2_EL2_nSPMACCESSR_EL1	|
>  		   HDFGWTR2_EL2_nSPMCNTEN	|
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/spe.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/spe.c
> index 8c173a1f48bd..3b285b45332b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/spe.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/spe.c
> @@ -113,6 +113,28 @@ void kvm_spe_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
>  	module_put(spe_pmu->pmu.module);
>  }
>
> +bool kvm_spe_has_feat_spe_fds(struct kvm *kvm)
> +{
> +	struct arm_spe_pmu *spe_pmu = kvm->arch.kvm_spe.spe_pmu;
> +
> +	if (!spe_pmu)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	return kvm_has_feat(kvm, ID_AA64DFR0_EL1, PMSVer, V1P4) &&
> +	       FIELD_GET(PMSIDR_EL1_FDS, spe_pmu->pmsidr_el1);
> +}
> +
> +bool kvm_spe_has_feat_spe_fne(struct kvm *kvm)
> +{
> +	struct arm_spe_pmu *spe_pmu = kvm->arch.kvm_spe.spe_pmu;
> +
> +	if (!spe_pmu)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	return kvm_has_feat(kvm, ID_AA64DFR0_EL1, PMSVer, V1P2) &&
> +	       FIELD_GET(PMSIDR_EL1_FnE, spe_pmu->pmsidr_el1);
> +}
> +
>  bool kvm_spe_write_sysreg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int reg, u64 val)
>  {
>  	struct kvm_spe *kvm_spe = &vcpu->kvm->arch.kvm_spe;
> --
> 2.43.0
>
>

--
Cheers, Lorenzo


  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-29 17:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-03 16:05 [RFC PATCH v7 00/28] KVM: arm64: Add Statistical Profiling Extension (SPE) support Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH v7 01/28] arm64/sysreg: Add the nVM field to PMBLIMITR_EL1 Alexandru Elisei
2026-10-15 13:23   ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-09-03 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH v7 02/28] arm64/sysreg: Define MDCR_EL2.E2PB values Alexandru Elisei
2026-10-15 13:52   ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-09-03 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH v7 03/28] KVM: arm64: Add CONFIG_KVM_ARM_SPE Kconfig option Alexandru Elisei
2026-10-15 14:15   ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-09-03 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH v7 04/28] perf: arm_spe_pmu: Move struct arm_spe_pmu to a separate header file Alexandru Elisei
2026-10-15 14:40   ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 05/28] perf: arm_spe_pmu: Add PMBIDR_EL1 and PMSIDR_EL1 to struct arm_spe_pmu Alexandru Elisei
2026-10-15 15:12   ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 06/28] KVM: arm64: Add KVM_CAP_ARM_SPE capability Alexandru Elisei
2026-10-15 16:51   ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 07/28] KVM: arm64: Add KVM_ARM_VCPU_SPE VCPU feature Alexandru Elisei
2026-10-16 14:23   ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 08/28] HACK! KVM: arm64: Disable SPE virtualization if protected KVM is enabled Alexandru Elisei
2026-10-16 14:30   ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 09/28] HACK! KVM: arm64: Enable SPE virtualization only in VHE mode Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 10/28] HACK! KVM: arm64: Disable SPE virtualization if nested virt is enabled Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 11/28] KVM: arm64: Add a new VCPU device control group for SPE Alexandru Elisei
2026-10-16 14:44   ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 12/28] KVM: arm64: Add SPE VCPU device attribute to set the interrupt number Alexandru Elisei
2026-10-20 17:20   ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-10-28 16:52   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 13/28] KVM: arm64: Add SPE VCPU device attribute to set the SPE device Alexandru Elisei
2026-10-28 13:11   ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 14/28] KVM: arm64: Add SPE VCPU device attribute to initialize SPE Alexandru Elisei
2026-10-28 13:45   ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-10-29 18:03   ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 15/28] KVM: arm64: Use PMSVer from the assigned SPE instance Alexandru Elisei
2026-10-28 16:41   ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 16/28] KVM: arm64: Add SPE system registers to VCPU context Alexandru Elisei
2026-10-29 15:42   ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 17/28] KVM: arm64: Apply a RES0 mask to PMBLIMITR_EL1 writes Alexandru Elisei
2026-10-29 17:23   ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 18/28] KVM: arm64: config: Use functions from spe.c to test FEAT_SPE_{FnE,FDS} Alexandru Elisei
2026-10-29 17:47   ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) [this message]
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 19/28] KVM: arm64: VHE: Context switch SPE state Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 20/28] KVM: arm64: Allow guest SPE physical timestamps only if kernel allows it Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 21/28] KVM: arm64: Handle SPE maintenance interrupts Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 22/28] arm64: errata: Disable SPE in KVM Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 23/28] KVM: arm64: Add kvm-arm.ignore_spe_errata kernel parameter Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 24/28] arm64: errata: Don't enable guest buffer if misprogrammed Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 25/28] KVM: arm64: at: Use callback for reading descriptor Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 26/28] KVM: arm64: Map memory on a SPE stage 2 fault Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 27/28] KVM: arm64: Handle dirty page logging when SPE feature is set Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 28/28] KVM: arm64: Allow the creation of a SPE enabled VM Alexandru Elisei
2026-10-15 10:25 ` [RFC PATCH v7 00/28] KVM: arm64: Add Statistical Profiling Extension (SPE) support Alexandru Elisei
2026-10-15 12:50   ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-10-15 13:22     ` Alexandru Elisei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=auOBFeXOmUYNHeAV@gremlin \
    --to=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=fuad.tabba@linux.dev \
    --cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oupton@kernel.org \
    --cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox