From: "Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)" <ljs@kernel.org>
To: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
Cc: maz@kernel.org, oupton@kernel.org, fuad.tabba@linux.dev,
joey.gouly@arm.com, seiden@linux.ibm.com,
suzuki.poulose@arm.com, yuzenghui@huawei.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
will@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
james.clark@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v7 04/28] perf: arm_spe_pmu: Move struct arm_spe_pmu to a separate header file
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2026 15:40:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <atDgBR0WOGHUsLaF@gremlin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260903160623.315525-5-alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
On Thu, Sep 03, 2026 at 05:05:59PM +0100, Alexandru Elisei wrote:
> KVM will soon want to make use of struct arm_spe_pmu, move it to a separate
> header where it will be easily accessible.
>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
Looks to be a straightforward mechanical change, couple nits below but with
those addressed:
Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) <ljs@kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c | 33 +--------------------
> include/linux/perf/arm_spe_pmu.h | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
This should be added to MAINTAINERS too I think?
> 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 include/linux/perf/arm_spe_pmu.h
>
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
> index b70f3fedf028..79c571a649d5 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
> #include <linux/of.h>
> #include <linux/perf_event.h>
> #include <linux/perf/arm_pmu.h>
> +#include <linux/perf/arm_spe_pmu.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/printk.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> @@ -67,38 +68,6 @@ struct arm_spe_pmu_buf {
> void *base;
> };
>
> -struct arm_spe_pmu {
> - struct pmu pmu;
> - struct platform_device *pdev;
> - cpumask_t supported_cpus;
> - struct hlist_node hotplug_node;
> -
> - int irq; /* PPI */
> - u16 pmsver;
> - u16 min_period;
> - u16 counter_sz;
> -
> -#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_FILT_EVT (1UL << 0)
> -#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_FILT_TYP (1UL << 1)
> -#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_FILT_LAT (1UL << 2)
> -#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_ARCH_INST (1UL << 3)
> -#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_LDS (1UL << 4)
> -#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_ERND (1UL << 5)
> -#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_INV_FILT_EVT (1UL << 6)
> -#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_DISCARD (1UL << 7)
> -#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_EFT (1UL << 8)
> -#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_FDS (1UL << 9)
> -#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_DEV_PROBED (1UL << 63)
> - u64 features;
> -
> - u64 pmsevfr_res0;
> - u16 max_record_sz;
> - u16 align;
> - struct perf_output_handle __percpu *handle;
> -};
> -
> -#define to_spe_pmu(p) (container_of(p, struct arm_spe_pmu, pmu))
> -
> /* Convert a free-running index from perf into an SPE buffer offset */
> #define PERF_IDX2OFF(idx, buf) \
> ((idx) % ((unsigned long)(buf)->nr_pages << PAGE_SHIFT))
> diff --git a/include/linux/perf/arm_spe_pmu.h b/include/linux/perf/arm_spe_pmu.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..af86fd184050
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/linux/perf/arm_spe_pmu.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
Pedantic I know, sorry :P but as per Documentation/process/license-rules.rst:
C source: // SPDX-License-Identifier: <SPDX License Expression>
C header: /* SPDX-License-Identifier: <SPDX License Expression> */
...
So should be /* */ here.
> +/*
> + * Split from driver/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
NIT: should be drivers/...
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2016 ARM Limited
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef __PERF_ARM_SPE_PMU_H__
> +#define __PERF_ARM_SPE_PMU_H__
> +
> +#include <linux/cpumask.h>
> +#include <linux/container_of.h>
> +#include <linux/list.h>
> +#include <linux/perf_event.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +
> +struct arm_spe_pmu {
> + struct pmu pmu;
> + struct platform_device *pdev;
> + cpumask_t supported_cpus;
> + struct hlist_node hotplug_node;
> +
> + int irq; /* PPI */
> + u16 pmsver;
> + u16 min_period;
> + u16 counter_sz;
> +
> +#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_FILT_EVT (1UL << 0)
> +#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_FILT_TYP (1UL << 1)
> +#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_FILT_LAT (1UL << 2)
> +#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_ARCH_INST (1UL << 3)
> +#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_LDS (1UL << 4)
> +#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_ERND (1UL << 5)
> +#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_INV_FILT_EVT (1UL << 6)
> +#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_DISCARD (1UL << 7)
> +#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_EFT (1UL << 8)
> +#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_FDS (1UL << 9)
> +#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_DEV_PROBED (1UL << 63)
> + u64 features;
> +
> + u64 pmsevfr_res0;
> + u16 max_record_sz;
> + u16 align;
> + struct perf_output_handle __percpu *handle;
> +};
> +
> +#define to_spe_pmu(p) (container_of(p, struct arm_spe_pmu, pmu))
> +
> +#endif /* __PERF_ARM_SPE_PMU_H__ */
> --
> 2.43.0
>
>
--
Cheers, Lorenzo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-15 14:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-03 16:05 [RFC PATCH v7 00/28] KVM: arm64: Add Statistical Profiling Extension (SPE) support Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH v7 01/28] arm64/sysreg: Add the nVM field to PMBLIMITR_EL1 Alexandru Elisei
2026-10-15 13:23 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-09-03 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH v7 02/28] arm64/sysreg: Define MDCR_EL2.E2PB values Alexandru Elisei
2026-10-15 13:52 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-09-03 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH v7 03/28] KVM: arm64: Add CONFIG_KVM_ARM_SPE Kconfig option Alexandru Elisei
2026-10-15 14:15 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-09-03 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH v7 04/28] perf: arm_spe_pmu: Move struct arm_spe_pmu to a separate header file Alexandru Elisei
2026-10-15 14:40 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) [this message]
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 05/28] perf: arm_spe_pmu: Add PMBIDR_EL1 and PMSIDR_EL1 to struct arm_spe_pmu Alexandru Elisei
2026-10-15 15:12 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 06/28] KVM: arm64: Add KVM_CAP_ARM_SPE capability Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 07/28] KVM: arm64: Add KVM_ARM_VCPU_SPE VCPU feature Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 08/28] HACK! KVM: arm64: Disable SPE virtualization if protected KVM is enabled Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 09/28] HACK! KVM: arm64: Enable SPE virtualization only in VHE mode Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 10/28] HACK! KVM: arm64: Disable SPE virtualization if nested virt is enabled Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 11/28] KVM: arm64: Add a new VCPU device control group for SPE Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 12/28] KVM: arm64: Add SPE VCPU device attribute to set the interrupt number Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 13/28] KVM: arm64: Add SPE VCPU device attribute to set the SPE device Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 14/28] KVM: arm64: Add SPE VCPU device attribute to initialize SPE Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 15/28] KVM: arm64: Use PMSVer from the assigned SPE instance Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 16/28] KVM: arm64: Add SPE system registers to VCPU context Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 17/28] KVM: arm64: Apply a RES0 mask to PMBLIMITR_EL1 writes Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 18/28] KVM: arm64: config: Use functions from spe.c to test FEAT_SPE_{FnE,FDS} Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 19/28] KVM: arm64: VHE: Context switch SPE state Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 20/28] KVM: arm64: Allow guest SPE physical timestamps only if kernel allows it Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 21/28] KVM: arm64: Handle SPE maintenance interrupts Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 22/28] arm64: errata: Disable SPE in KVM Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 23/28] KVM: arm64: Add kvm-arm.ignore_spe_errata kernel parameter Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 24/28] arm64: errata: Don't enable guest buffer if misprogrammed Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 25/28] KVM: arm64: at: Use callback for reading descriptor Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 26/28] KVM: arm64: Map memory on a SPE stage 2 fault Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 27/28] KVM: arm64: Handle dirty page logging when SPE feature is set Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 28/28] KVM: arm64: Allow the creation of a SPE enabled VM Alexandru Elisei
2026-10-15 10:25 ` [RFC PATCH v7 00/28] KVM: arm64: Add Statistical Profiling Extension (SPE) support Alexandru Elisei
2026-10-15 12:50 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-10-15 13:22 ` Alexandru Elisei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=atDgBR0WOGHUsLaF@gremlin \
--to=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=fuad.tabba@linux.dev \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox