Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)" <ljs@kernel.org>
To: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
Cc: maz@kernel.org, oupton@kernel.org, fuad.tabba@linux.dev,
	 joey.gouly@arm.com, seiden@linux.ibm.com,
	suzuki.poulose@arm.com,  yuzenghui@huawei.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
	 will@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,  catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	james.clark@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v7 04/28] perf: arm_spe_pmu: Move struct arm_spe_pmu to a separate header file
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2026 15:40:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <atDgBR0WOGHUsLaF@gremlin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260903160623.315525-5-alexandru.elisei@arm.com>

On Thu, Sep 03, 2026 at 05:05:59PM +0100, Alexandru Elisei wrote:
> KVM will soon want to make use of struct arm_spe_pmu, move it to a separate
> header where it will be easily accessible.
>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>

Looks to be a straightforward mechanical change, couple nits below but with
those addressed:

Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) <ljs@kernel.org>

> ---
>  drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c       | 33 +--------------------
>  include/linux/perf/arm_spe_pmu.h | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

This should be added to MAINTAINERS too I think?

>  2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 include/linux/perf/arm_spe_pmu.h
>
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
> index b70f3fedf028..79c571a649d5 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
>  #include <linux/of.h>
>  #include <linux/perf_event.h>
>  #include <linux/perf/arm_pmu.h>
> +#include <linux/perf/arm_spe_pmu.h>
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>  #include <linux/printk.h>
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
> @@ -67,38 +68,6 @@ struct arm_spe_pmu_buf {
>  	void					*base;
>  };
>
> -struct arm_spe_pmu {
> -	struct pmu				pmu;
> -	struct platform_device			*pdev;
> -	cpumask_t				supported_cpus;
> -	struct hlist_node			hotplug_node;
> -
> -	int					irq; /* PPI */
> -	u16					pmsver;
> -	u16					min_period;
> -	u16					counter_sz;
> -
> -#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_FILT_EVT			(1UL << 0)
> -#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_FILT_TYP			(1UL << 1)
> -#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_FILT_LAT			(1UL << 2)
> -#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_ARCH_INST			(1UL << 3)
> -#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_LDS			(1UL << 4)
> -#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_ERND			(1UL << 5)
> -#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_INV_FILT_EVT		(1UL << 6)
> -#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_DISCARD			(1UL << 7)
> -#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_EFT			(1UL << 8)
> -#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_FDS			(1UL << 9)
> -#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_DEV_PROBED			(1UL << 63)
> -	u64					features;
> -
> -	u64					pmsevfr_res0;
> -	u16					max_record_sz;
> -	u16					align;
> -	struct perf_output_handle __percpu	*handle;
> -};
> -
> -#define to_spe_pmu(p) (container_of(p, struct arm_spe_pmu, pmu))
> -
>  /* Convert a free-running index from perf into an SPE buffer offset */
>  #define PERF_IDX2OFF(idx, buf) \
>  	((idx) % ((unsigned long)(buf)->nr_pages << PAGE_SHIFT))
> diff --git a/include/linux/perf/arm_spe_pmu.h b/include/linux/perf/arm_spe_pmu.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..af86fd184050
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/linux/perf/arm_spe_pmu.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0

Pedantic I know, sorry :P but as per Documentation/process/license-rules.rst:

      C source:	// SPDX-License-Identifier: <SPDX License Expression>
      C header:	/* SPDX-License-Identifier: <SPDX License Expression> */
      ...

So should be /* */ here.

> +/*
> + * Split from driver/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c

NIT: should be drivers/...

> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2016 ARM Limited
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef __PERF_ARM_SPE_PMU_H__
> +#define __PERF_ARM_SPE_PMU_H__
> +
> +#include <linux/cpumask.h>
> +#include <linux/container_of.h>
> +#include <linux/list.h>
> +#include <linux/perf_event.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +
> +struct arm_spe_pmu {
> +	struct pmu				pmu;
> +	struct platform_device			*pdev;
> +	cpumask_t				supported_cpus;
> +	struct hlist_node			hotplug_node;
> +
> +	int					irq; /* PPI */
> +	u16					pmsver;
> +	u16					min_period;
> +	u16					counter_sz;
> +
> +#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_FILT_EVT			(1UL << 0)
> +#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_FILT_TYP			(1UL << 1)
> +#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_FILT_LAT			(1UL << 2)
> +#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_ARCH_INST			(1UL << 3)
> +#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_LDS			(1UL << 4)
> +#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_ERND			(1UL << 5)
> +#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_INV_FILT_EVT		(1UL << 6)
> +#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_DISCARD			(1UL << 7)
> +#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_EFT			(1UL << 8)
> +#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_FDS			(1UL << 9)
> +#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_DEV_PROBED			(1UL << 63)
> +	u64					features;
> +
> +	u64					pmsevfr_res0;
> +	u16					max_record_sz;
> +	u16					align;
> +	struct perf_output_handle __percpu	*handle;
> +};
> +
> +#define to_spe_pmu(p) (container_of(p, struct arm_spe_pmu, pmu))
> +
> +#endif /* __PERF_ARM_SPE_PMU_H__ */
> --
> 2.43.0
>
>

--
Cheers, Lorenzo


  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-15 14:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-03 16:05 [RFC PATCH v7 00/28] KVM: arm64: Add Statistical Profiling Extension (SPE) support Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH v7 01/28] arm64/sysreg: Add the nVM field to PMBLIMITR_EL1 Alexandru Elisei
2026-10-15 13:23   ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-09-03 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH v7 02/28] arm64/sysreg: Define MDCR_EL2.E2PB values Alexandru Elisei
2026-10-15 13:52   ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-09-03 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH v7 03/28] KVM: arm64: Add CONFIG_KVM_ARM_SPE Kconfig option Alexandru Elisei
2026-10-15 14:15   ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-09-03 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH v7 04/28] perf: arm_spe_pmu: Move struct arm_spe_pmu to a separate header file Alexandru Elisei
2026-10-15 14:40   ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) [this message]
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 05/28] perf: arm_spe_pmu: Add PMBIDR_EL1 and PMSIDR_EL1 to struct arm_spe_pmu Alexandru Elisei
2026-10-15 15:12   ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 06/28] KVM: arm64: Add KVM_CAP_ARM_SPE capability Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 07/28] KVM: arm64: Add KVM_ARM_VCPU_SPE VCPU feature Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 08/28] HACK! KVM: arm64: Disable SPE virtualization if protected KVM is enabled Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 09/28] HACK! KVM: arm64: Enable SPE virtualization only in VHE mode Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 10/28] HACK! KVM: arm64: Disable SPE virtualization if nested virt is enabled Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 11/28] KVM: arm64: Add a new VCPU device control group for SPE Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 12/28] KVM: arm64: Add SPE VCPU device attribute to set the interrupt number Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 13/28] KVM: arm64: Add SPE VCPU device attribute to set the SPE device Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 14/28] KVM: arm64: Add SPE VCPU device attribute to initialize SPE Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 15/28] KVM: arm64: Use PMSVer from the assigned SPE instance Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 16/28] KVM: arm64: Add SPE system registers to VCPU context Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 17/28] KVM: arm64: Apply a RES0 mask to PMBLIMITR_EL1 writes Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 18/28] KVM: arm64: config: Use functions from spe.c to test FEAT_SPE_{FnE,FDS} Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 19/28] KVM: arm64: VHE: Context switch SPE state Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 20/28] KVM: arm64: Allow guest SPE physical timestamps only if kernel allows it Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 21/28] KVM: arm64: Handle SPE maintenance interrupts Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 22/28] arm64: errata: Disable SPE in KVM Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 23/28] KVM: arm64: Add kvm-arm.ignore_spe_errata kernel parameter Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 24/28] arm64: errata: Don't enable guest buffer if misprogrammed Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 25/28] KVM: arm64: at: Use callback for reading descriptor Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 26/28] KVM: arm64: Map memory on a SPE stage 2 fault Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 27/28] KVM: arm64: Handle dirty page logging when SPE feature is set Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 28/28] KVM: arm64: Allow the creation of a SPE enabled VM Alexandru Elisei
2026-10-15 10:25 ` [RFC PATCH v7 00/28] KVM: arm64: Add Statistical Profiling Extension (SPE) support Alexandru Elisei
2026-10-15 12:50   ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-10-15 13:22     ` Alexandru Elisei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=atDgBR0WOGHUsLaF@gremlin \
    --to=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=fuad.tabba@linux.dev \
    --cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oupton@kernel.org \
    --cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox