Re: [v2,0/4] Convert pwm-mtk-disp.txt to mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml format

[xinlei.lee <xinlei.lee@mediatek.com>]

On Wed, 2022-02-16 at 17:47 +0800, Macpaul Lin wrote:
> 
> On 2/16/22 5:32 PM, xinlei.lee@mediatek.com wrote:
> > From: Xinlei Lee <xinlei.lee@mediatek.corp-partner.google.com>
> > 
> > Changes since v1:
> > 1. Fixed formatting issues mentioned in the v1.
> > 2. Delete pwm-mtk-disp.txt.
> > 3. Add mtk_pwm dt_maintainers.
> > 4. Add "#pwm-cells" & power-domains properties.
> > 5. Make dt_checking successful.
> > 
> > Xinlei Lee (4):
> >    dt-bindings: pwm: Convert pwm-mtk-disp.txt to mediatek,pwm-
> > disp.yaml
> >      format
> >    dt-bindings: pwm: Add compatible for MediaTek MT8192
> >    dt-bindings: pwm: Add compatible for MediaTek MT8195
> >    dt-bindings: pwm: Add compatible for MediaTek MT8186
> > 
> >   .../bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml       | 74
> > +++++++++++++++++++
> >   .../devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.txt  | 44 -----------
> >   2 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
> >   create mode 100755
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml
> >   delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-mtk-
> > disp.txt
> > 
> 
> Why did you drop [PATCH] tag in the subject of your patch series?
> Please keep it for distinguishing it from RFC/RESEND and other 
> meaningful tags next time.
> 
> Thanks
> Macpaul Lin

Hi Macpaul Lin:

Thanks for your review, maybe the processing of the [PATCH] tag was
inaccurate before. 
I confirmed with my colleagues that I will keep this tag in the next
version.

Best Regards!
xinlei
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel