From: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: ryan.roberts@arm.com, usama.anjum@arm.com, peterz@infradead.org,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, david.laight.linux@gmail.com,
stable@vger.kernel.org, ruanjinjie@huawei.com,
james.morse@arm.com, yang@os.amperecomputing.com, cl@gentwo.org,
maz@kernel.org, david@kernel.org, ljs@kernel.org,
will@kernel.org, ardb@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 18/21] arm64: percpu: Implement preemptible XCHG ops
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2026 13:07:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f9112506-2444-41e9-b38d-7bf0b445a552@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260908151741.394589-19-mark.rutland@arm.com>
On 9/8/26 16:17, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Use the PCPU GPR infrastructure to implement all of the xchg ops
>
> Test case:
>
> | u64 outline_xchg_name(u64 *p, u64 v)
> | {
> | return xchg(p, v);
> | }
>
> Generated code before this patch (v7.2-rc4):
>
> | <outline_this_cpu_xchg_u64>:
> | paciasp
> | stp x29, x30, [sp, #-32]!
> | mrs x3, sp_el0
> | mov x29, sp
> | ldr w2, [x3, #8]
> | add w2, w2, #0x1
> | str w2, [x3, #8]
> | mov x2, x0
> | mrs x4, tpidr_el1
> | add x2, x2, x4
> | prfm pstl1strm, [x2]
> | 1: ldxr x0, [x2]
> | stxr w5, x1, [x2]
> | cbnz w5, 1b
> | ldr x1, [x3, #8]
> | sub x1, x1, #0x1
> | str w1, [x3, #8]
> | cbz x1, 2f
> | ldr x1, [x3, #8]
> | cbnz x1, 3f
> | 2: str x0, [sp, #24]
> | bl preempt_schedule_notrace
> | ldr x0, [sp, #24]
> | 3: ldp x29, x30, [sp], #32
> | autiasp
> | ret
>
> Generated code after this patch:
>
> | <outline_this_cpu_xchg_u64>:
> | mrs x3, sp_el0
> | mov w5, #0x10a0
> | strh w5, [x3, #20]
> | mrs x5, tpidr_el1
> | add x4, x0, x5
> | prfm pstl1strm, [x4]
> | 1: ldxr x2, [x4]
> | stxr w6, x1, [x4]
> | cbnz w6, 1b
> | strh wzr, [x3, #20]
> | mov x0, x2
> | ret
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Tested-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@arm.com>
> Cc: Ada Couprie Diaz <ada.coupriediaz@arm.com>
> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> Cc: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Cc: Yang Shi <yang@os.amperecomputing.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h
> index 9fe44d04c871b..820340c61d70f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h
> @@ -269,6 +269,50 @@ PERCPU_RET_OP(add, add, ldadd)
> #undef PERCPU_OP
> #undef PERCPU_RET_OP
>
> +#define PERCPU_XCHG_OP(w, sfx, sz) \
> +static inline unsigned long \
> +__percpu_xchg_case_##sz(void __percpu *pcp, u##sz val) \
> +{ \
> + u16 *gprs = ¤t_thread_info()->pcpu_gprs; \
> + unsigned long addr; \
> + unsigned long off; \
> + unsigned int loop; \
> + unsigned long ret; \
> + \
> + asm volatile ( \
> + __PCPU_GPRS_BEGIN("%[gprs]", "%[pcp]", "%[off]", "%[addr]") \
> + ARM64_LSE_ATOMIC_INSN( \
> + /* LL/SC */ \
> + " prfm pstl1strm, [%[addr]]\n" \
> + "1: ldxr" #sfx "\t%" #w "[ret], [%[addr]]\n" \
> + " stxr" #sfx "\t%w[loop], %" #w "[val], [%[addr]]\n" \
> + " cbnz %w[loop], 1b\n" \
> + , \
> + /* LSE atomics */ \
> + " swp" #sfx "\t%" #w "[val], %" #w "[ret], [%[addr]]\n" \
> + __nops(3) \
> + ) \
> + __PCPU_GPRS_END("%[gprs]") \
> + : [gprs] "=Qo" (*gprs), \
> + [addr] "=&r" (addr), \
> + [off] "=&r" (off), \
> + [loop] "=&r" (loop), \
> + [ret] "=&r" (ret) \
> + : [pcp] "r" (pcp), \
> + [val] "r" (val) \
> + : "memory" \
> + ); \
> + \
> + return ret; \
> +}
> +
> +PERCPU_XCHG_OP(w, b, 8)
> +PERCPU_XCHG_OP(w, h, 16)
> +PERCPU_XCHG_OP(w, , 32)
> +PERCPU_XCHG_OP(x, , 64)
> +
> +#undef PERCPU_XCHG_OP
> +
> /*
> * It would be nice to avoid the conditional call into the scheduler when
> * re-enabling preemption for preemptible kernels, but doing that in a way
> @@ -306,6 +350,11 @@ PERCPU_RET_OP(add, add, ldadd)
> (typeof(pcp))op(&(pcp), ##args); \
> })
>
> +#define _pcp_wrap_xchg(op, pcp, val) \
> +({ \
> + (typeof(pcp))op(&(pcp), (unsigned long)(val)); \
> +})
> +
> #define this_cpu_read_1(pcp) \
> _pcp_wrap_return(__percpu_read_8, pcp)
> #define this_cpu_read_2(pcp) \
> @@ -361,13 +410,13 @@ PERCPU_RET_OP(add, add, ldadd)
> _pcp_wrap(__percpu_or_case_64, pcp, val)
>
> #define this_cpu_xchg_1(pcp, val) \
> - _pcp_protect_return(xchg_relaxed, pcp, val)
> + _pcp_wrap_xchg(__percpu_xchg_case_8, pcp, val)
> #define this_cpu_xchg_2(pcp, val) \
> - _pcp_protect_return(xchg_relaxed, pcp, val)
> + _pcp_wrap_xchg(__percpu_xchg_case_16, pcp, val)
> #define this_cpu_xchg_4(pcp, val) \
> - _pcp_protect_return(xchg_relaxed, pcp, val)
> + _pcp_wrap_xchg(__percpu_xchg_case_32, pcp, val)
> #define this_cpu_xchg_8(pcp, val) \
> - _pcp_protect_return(xchg_relaxed, pcp, val)
> + _pcp_wrap_xchg(__percpu_xchg_case_64, pcp, val)
>
> #define this_cpu_cmpxchg_1(pcp, o, n) \
> _pcp_protect_return(cmpxchg_relaxed, pcp, o, n)
> -- 2.30.2
>
FWIW,
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-15 12:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-08 15:17 [PATCH v4 00/21] Preemptible this_cpu_*() operations Mark Rutland
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 01/21] arm64: percpu: Fix this_cpu_write() casting Mark Rutland
2026-09-10 10:56 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 02/21] arm64: percpu: Fix this_cpu_and() mask generation Mark Rutland
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 03/21] arm64: percpu: Fix LSE operations on {8,16}-bit types Mark Rutland
2026-09-10 15:18 ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 04/21] arm64: cmpxchg: LL/SC: Avoid redundant extension Mark Rutland
2026-09-15 14:21 ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 05/21] arm64: cmpxchg128: LSE: Remove redundant operands Mark Rutland
2026-09-10 10:06 ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-11 11:43 ` Mark Rutland
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 06/21] arm64: preempt: Simplify and optimize __preempt_count_dec_and_test() Mark Rutland
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 07/21] arm64: preempt: Treat should_resched() as unlikely Mark Rutland
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 08/21] arm64: ptrace: Always inline pt_regs_[read,write}_reg() Mark Rutland
2026-09-11 10:20 ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 09/21] arm64: percpu: Factor out percpu offset asm Mark Rutland
2026-09-11 12:39 ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 10/21] arm64: gpr-num: Add wxN aliases for wN registers Mark Rutland
2026-09-11 12:43 ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 11/21] arm64: gpr-num: add __GPR_NUM() helper Mark Rutland
2026-09-10 14:24 ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 12/21] arm64: entry: sdei: Restore all clobberable GPRs Mark Rutland
2026-09-11 12:47 ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 13/21] arm64: entry: sdei: Make 'tsk' available Mark Rutland
2026-09-10 13:06 ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 14/21] arm64: percpu: Add infrastructure for preemptible this_cpu_*() ops Mark Rutland
2026-09-15 14:19 ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 15/21] arm64: percpu: Implement preemptible read/write ops Mark Rutland
2026-09-15 11:58 ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 16/21] arm64: percpu: Implement preemptible void RMW ops Mark Rutland
2026-09-15 12:01 ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 17/21] arm64: percpu: Implement preemptible return " Mark Rutland
2026-09-15 12:03 ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 18/21] arm64: percpu: Implement preemptible XCHG ops Mark Rutland
2026-09-15 12:07 ` Vladimir Murzin [this message]
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 19/21] arm64: percpu: Implement preemptible CMPXCHG ops Mark Rutland
2026-09-15 14:20 ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 20/21] arm64: percpu: Implement preemptible CMPXCHG128 ops Mark Rutland
2026-09-15 14:20 ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 21/21] arm64: percpu: Remove _pcp_protect*() wrappers Mark Rutland
2026-09-15 14:21 ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-11 13:44 ` [PATCH v4 00/21] Preemptible this_cpu_*() operations Will Deacon
2026-09-24 16:03 ` (subset) " Catalin Marinas
2026-09-30 13:14 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f9112506-2444-41e9-b38d-7bf0b445a552@arm.com \
--to=vladimir.murzin@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=usama.anjum@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox