* [PATCH v5 1/3] clk: qcom: gdsc: Capture pm_genpd_add_subdomain result code
2024-11-28 16:37 [PATCH v5 0/3] clk: qcom: Add support for multiple power-domains for a clock controller Bryan O'Donoghue
@ 2024-11-28 16:38 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2024-11-28 16:38 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] clk: qcom: common: Add support for power-domain attachment Bryan O'Donoghue
2024-11-28 16:38 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] clk: qcom: Support attaching GDSCs to multiple parents Bryan O'Donoghue
2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Bryan O'Donoghue @ 2024-11-28 16:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bjorn Andersson, Michael Turquette, Stephen Boyd,
Dmitry Baryshkov
Cc: linux-arm-msm, linux-clk, linux-kernel, Bryan O'Donoghue,
stable
Adding a new clause to this if/else I noticed the existing usage of
pm_genpd_add_subdomain() wasn't capturing and returning the result code.
pm_genpd_add_subdomain() returns an int and can fail. Capture that result
code and throw it up the call stack if something goes wrong.
Fixes: 1b771839de05 ("clk: qcom: gdsc: enable optional power domain support")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>
---
drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c
index fa5fe4c2a2ee7786c2e8858f3e41301f639e5d59..4fc6f957d0b846cc90e50ef243f23a7a27e66899 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c
@@ -555,9 +555,11 @@ int gdsc_register(struct gdsc_desc *desc,
if (!scs[i])
continue;
if (scs[i]->parent)
- pm_genpd_add_subdomain(scs[i]->parent, &scs[i]->pd);
+ ret = pm_genpd_add_subdomain(scs[i]->parent, &scs[i]->pd);
else if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dev->pm_domain))
- pm_genpd_add_subdomain(pd_to_genpd(dev->pm_domain), &scs[i]->pd);
+ ret = pm_genpd_add_subdomain(pd_to_genpd(dev->pm_domain), &scs[i]->pd);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
}
return of_genpd_add_provider_onecell(dev->of_node, data);
--
2.45.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [PATCH v5 2/3] clk: qcom: common: Add support for power-domain attachment
2024-11-28 16:37 [PATCH v5 0/3] clk: qcom: Add support for multiple power-domains for a clock controller Bryan O'Donoghue
2024-11-28 16:38 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] clk: qcom: gdsc: Capture pm_genpd_add_subdomain result code Bryan O'Donoghue
@ 2024-11-28 16:38 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2024-11-29 11:30 ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2024-11-28 16:38 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] clk: qcom: Support attaching GDSCs to multiple parents Bryan O'Donoghue
2 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Bryan O'Donoghue @ 2024-11-28 16:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bjorn Andersson, Michael Turquette, Stephen Boyd,
Dmitry Baryshkov
Cc: linux-arm-msm, linux-clk, linux-kernel, Bryan O'Donoghue
Right now we support one power-domain per clock controller.
These single power-domains are switched on by the driver platform logic.
However when we have multiple power-domains attached to a clock-controller
that list of power-domains must be handled outside of driver platform
logic.
Use devm_pm_domain_attach_list() to automatically hook the list of given
power-domains in the dtsi for the clock-controller driver.
Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>
---
drivers/clk/qcom/common.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/common.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/common.c
index 33cc1f73c69d1f875a193aea0552902268dc8716..e6a024e95ab5f4b0776ffc6c7b3bebfbebb007fd 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/qcom/common.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/common.c
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ struct qcom_cc {
struct qcom_reset_controller reset;
struct clk_regmap **rclks;
size_t num_rclks;
+ struct dev_pm_domain_list *pd_list;
};
const
@@ -294,11 +295,19 @@ int qcom_cc_really_probe(struct device *dev,
struct clk_regmap **rclks = desc->clks;
size_t num_clk_hws = desc->num_clk_hws;
struct clk_hw **clk_hws = desc->clk_hws;
+ struct dev_pm_domain_attach_data pd_data = {
+ .pd_names = 0,
+ .num_pd_names = 0,
+ };
cc = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*cc), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!cc)
return -ENOMEM;
+ ret = devm_pm_domain_attach_list(dev, &pd_data, &cc->pd_list);
+ if (ret < 0 && ret != -EEXIST)
+ return ret;
+
reset = &cc->reset;
reset->rcdev.of_node = dev->of_node;
reset->rcdev.ops = &qcom_reset_ops;
--
2.45.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] clk: qcom: common: Add support for power-domain attachment
2024-11-28 16:38 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] clk: qcom: common: Add support for power-domain attachment Bryan O'Donoghue
@ 2024-11-29 11:30 ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2024-11-29 11:39 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Vladimir Zapolskiy @ 2024-11-29 11:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bryan O'Donoghue, Bjorn Andersson, Michael Turquette,
Stephen Boyd, Dmitry Baryshkov
Cc: linux-arm-msm, linux-clk, linux-kernel
Hi Bryan,
On 11/28/24 18:38, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> Right now we support one power-domain per clock controller.
> These single power-domains are switched on by the driver platform logic.
>
> However when we have multiple power-domains attached to a clock-controller
> that list of power-domains must be handled outside of driver platform
> logic.
>
> Use devm_pm_domain_attach_list() to automatically hook the list of given
> power-domains in the dtsi for the clock-controller driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/clk/qcom/common.c | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/common.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/common.c
> index 33cc1f73c69d1f875a193aea0552902268dc8716..e6a024e95ab5f4b0776ffc6c7b3bebfbebb007fd 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/common.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/common.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ struct qcom_cc {
> struct qcom_reset_controller reset;
> struct clk_regmap **rclks;
> size_t num_rclks;
> + struct dev_pm_domain_list *pd_list;
> };
>
> const
> @@ -294,11 +295,19 @@ int qcom_cc_really_probe(struct device *dev,
> struct clk_regmap **rclks = desc->clks;
> size_t num_clk_hws = desc->num_clk_hws;
> struct clk_hw **clk_hws = desc->clk_hws;
> + struct dev_pm_domain_attach_data pd_data = {
> + .pd_names = 0,
> + .num_pd_names = 0,
> + };
>
> cc = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*cc), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!cc)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> + ret = devm_pm_domain_attach_list(dev, &pd_data, &cc->pd_list);
Please make a call to the function like this:
ret = devm_pm_domain_attach_list(dev, NULL, &cc->pd_list);
Here pd_data is unused.
> + if (ret < 0 && ret != -EEXIST)
> + return ret;
> +
> reset = &cc->reset;
> reset->rcdev.of_node = dev->of_node;
> reset->rcdev.ops = &qcom_reset_ops;
>
--
Best wishes,
Vladimir
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] clk: qcom: common: Add support for power-domain attachment
2024-11-29 11:30 ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
@ 2024-11-29 11:39 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2024-11-29 11:44 ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Bryan O'Donoghue @ 2024-11-29 11:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vladimir Zapolskiy, Bjorn Andersson, Michael Turquette,
Stephen Boyd, Dmitry Baryshkov
Cc: linux-arm-msm, linux-clk, linux-kernel
On 29/11/2024 11:30, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>> + ret = devm_pm_domain_attach_list(dev, &pd_data, &cc->pd_list);
>
> Please make a call to the function like this:
>
> ret = devm_pm_domain_attach_list(dev, NULL, &cc->pd_list);
Passing &pd_data will cause devm_pd_domain_attach_list() to cycle
through the power-domains listed and do dev_pm_domain_attach_by_id();
instead of dv_pm_domain_attach_by_name();
That's what &pd_data is passed here. You want to have that simple
attachment of the power-domain list.
---
bod
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] clk: qcom: common: Add support for power-domain attachment
2024-11-29 11:39 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
@ 2024-11-29 11:44 ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2024-11-29 12:44 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Vladimir Zapolskiy @ 2024-11-29 11:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bryan O'Donoghue, Bjorn Andersson, Michael Turquette,
Stephen Boyd, Dmitry Baryshkov
Cc: linux-arm-msm, linux-clk, linux-kernel
On 11/29/24 13:39, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 29/11/2024 11:30, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>>> + ret = devm_pm_domain_attach_list(dev, &pd_data, &cc->pd_list);
>>
>> Please make a call to the function like this:
>>
>> ret = devm_pm_domain_attach_list(dev, NULL, &cc->pd_list);
>
> Passing &pd_data will cause devm_pd_domain_attach_list() to cycle
> through the power-domains listed and do dev_pm_domain_attach_by_id();
Doesn't it cycle for pd_data.num_pd_names times? Which is zero.
> instead of dv_pm_domain_attach_by_name();
>
> That's what &pd_data is passed here. You want to have that simple
> attachment of the power-domain list.
I look at dev_pm_domain_attach_list() function with my best efforts
to concentrate and see no functional difference between your version
and the one proposed by me since v1.
--
Best wishes,
Vladimir
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] clk: qcom: common: Add support for power-domain attachment
2024-11-29 11:44 ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
@ 2024-11-29 12:44 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Bryan O'Donoghue @ 2024-11-29 12:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vladimir Zapolskiy, Bjorn Andersson, Michael Turquette,
Stephen Boyd, Dmitry Baryshkov
Cc: linux-arm-msm, linux-clk, linux-kernel
On 29/11/2024 11:44, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> On 11/29/24 13:39, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>> On 29/11/2024 11:30, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>>>> + ret = devm_pm_domain_attach_list(dev, &pd_data, &cc->pd_list);
>>>
>>> Please make a call to the function like this:
>>>
>>> ret = devm_pm_domain_attach_list(dev, NULL, &cc->pd_list);
>>
>> Passing &pd_data will cause devm_pd_domain_attach_list() to cycle
>> through the power-domains listed and do dev_pm_domain_attach_by_id();
>
> Doesn't it cycle for pd_data.num_pd_names times? Which is zero.
>
>> instead of dv_pm_domain_attach_by_name();
>>
>> That's what &pd_data is passed here. You want to have that simple
>> attachment of the power-domain list.
>
> I look at dev_pm_domain_attach_list() function with my best efforts
> to concentrate and see no functional difference between your version
> and the one proposed by me since v1.
>
> --
> Best wishes,
> Vladimir
You're right.
I tested again, NULL works. I'll v6.
---
bod
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v5 3/3] clk: qcom: Support attaching GDSCs to multiple parents
2024-11-28 16:37 [PATCH v5 0/3] clk: qcom: Add support for multiple power-domains for a clock controller Bryan O'Donoghue
2024-11-28 16:38 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] clk: qcom: gdsc: Capture pm_genpd_add_subdomain result code Bryan O'Donoghue
2024-11-28 16:38 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] clk: qcom: common: Add support for power-domain attachment Bryan O'Donoghue
@ 2024-11-28 16:38 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Bryan O'Donoghue @ 2024-11-28 16:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bjorn Andersson, Michael Turquette, Stephen Boyd,
Dmitry Baryshkov
Cc: linux-arm-msm, linux-clk, linux-kernel, Bryan O'Donoghue
When a clock-controller has multiple power-domains we need to attach
parent GDSCs in that clock-controller as subdomains of each of the
power-domains.
Testing on the x1e80100 reference shows that both power-domains need to be
switched on for the GDSCs in the clock-controller to work. Some open
questions remain.
1. Should there be a hirearchy of power-domains in the clock-controller.
2. If there should be no hirearchy should the parent GDSC inside the
clock-controller attach to each power-domain in the clock-controller.
3. If there are multiple parent GDSCs in a clock-controller do we attach
those top-level GDSCs to each controller power-domain.
4. Finally should performance-states be applied equally across those
power-domains.
It may be if we see more clock-controllers with multiple power-domains that
some mixture of these questions will need to be implemented for specific
hardware. Right now the approach taken here is to attach the
clock-controller GDSC parent to each clock-controller power-domain.
Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>
---
drivers/clk/qcom/common.c | 1 +
drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 37 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/common.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/common.c
index e6a024e95ab5f4b0776ffc6c7b3bebfbebb007fd..2976e360ed383f148995efcebbf73e2ebc917c83 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/qcom/common.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/common.c
@@ -327,6 +327,7 @@ int qcom_cc_really_probe(struct device *dev,
scd->dev = dev;
scd->scs = desc->gdscs;
scd->num = desc->num_gdscs;
+ scd->pd_list = cc->pd_list;
ret = gdsc_register(scd, &reset->rcdev, regmap);
if (ret)
return ret;
diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c
index 4fc6f957d0b846cc90e50ef243f23a7a27e66899..cb4afa6d584899f3dafa380d5e01be6de9711737 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c
@@ -506,6 +506,36 @@ static int gdsc_init(struct gdsc *sc)
return ret;
}
+static int gdsc_add_subdomain_list(struct dev_pm_domain_list *pd_list,
+ struct generic_pm_domain *subdomain)
+{
+ int i, ret;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < pd_list->num_pds; i++) {
+ struct device *dev = pd_list->pd_devs[i];
+ struct generic_pm_domain *genpd = pd_to_genpd(dev->pm_domain);
+
+ ret = pm_genpd_add_subdomain(genpd, subdomain);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void gdsc_remove_subdomain_list(struct dev_pm_domain_list *pd_list,
+ struct generic_pm_domain *subdomain)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < pd_list->num_pds; i++) {
+ struct device *dev = pd_list->pd_devs[i];
+ struct generic_pm_domain *genpd = pd_to_genpd(dev->pm_domain);
+
+ pm_genpd_remove_subdomain(genpd, subdomain);
+ }
+}
+
int gdsc_register(struct gdsc_desc *desc,
struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev, struct regmap *regmap)
{
@@ -558,6 +588,9 @@ int gdsc_register(struct gdsc_desc *desc,
ret = pm_genpd_add_subdomain(scs[i]->parent, &scs[i]->pd);
else if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dev->pm_domain))
ret = pm_genpd_add_subdomain(pd_to_genpd(dev->pm_domain), &scs[i]->pd);
+ else if (desc->pd_list)
+ ret = gdsc_add_subdomain_list(desc->pd_list, &scs[i]->pd);
+
if (ret)
return ret;
}
@@ -580,6 +613,8 @@ void gdsc_unregister(struct gdsc_desc *desc)
pm_genpd_remove_subdomain(scs[i]->parent, &scs[i]->pd);
else if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dev->pm_domain))
pm_genpd_remove_subdomain(pd_to_genpd(dev->pm_domain), &scs[i]->pd);
+ else if (desc->pd_list)
+ gdsc_remove_subdomain_list(desc->pd_list, &scs[i]->pd);
}
of_genpd_del_provider(dev->of_node);
}
diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.h b/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.h
index 1e2779b823d1c8ca077c9b4cd0a0dbdf5f9457ef..dd843e86c05b2f30e6d9e978681580016333839d 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.h
+++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.h
@@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ struct gdsc_desc {
struct device *dev;
struct gdsc **scs;
size_t num;
+ struct dev_pm_domain_list *pd_list;
};
#ifdef CONFIG_QCOM_GDSC
--
2.45.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread