From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, andersson@kernel.org,
agross@kernel.org
Cc: marijn.suijten@somainline.org, Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>,
Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com>,
Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
Akhil P Oommen <quic_akhilpo@quicinc.com>,
Chia-I Wu <olvaffe@gmail.com>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
"Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/14] drm/msm/a6xx: Add support for A619_holi
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 22:21:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9269c5dd-d97c-e29a-98a9-b42c598ebfc6@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8268b4c9-ca5e-4ff3-628c-7e9daaeb16b0@linaro.org>
On 17.02.2023 22:19, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On 14/02/2023 19:31, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> A619_holi is a GMU-less variant of the already-supported A619 GPU.
>> It's present on at least SM4350 (holi) and SM6375 (blair). No mesa
>> changes are required. Add the required kernel-side support for it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++-----
>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c | 13 ++++++++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h | 5 +++
>> 3 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
>> index 75cf94b03c29..c168712a0dc4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
>> @@ -614,14 +614,14 @@ static void a6xx_set_hwcg(struct msm_gpu *gpu, bool state)
>> return;
>> /* Disable SP clock before programming HWCG registers */
>> - if (!adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu))
>> + if ((!adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu) || adreno_is_a619_holi(adreno_gpu)))
>
> Extra parenthesis made me interpret this incorrectly. Maybe you can remove them and spit the condition onto two lines? Because my first interpretation was:
> if (!(has_gmu_wrapper || a619_holi)).
Yeah, I agree this is confusing.. will fix.
>
>
>> gmu_rmw(gmu, REG_A6XX_GPU_GMU_GX_SPTPRAC_CLOCK_CONTROL, 1, 0);
>> for (i = 0; (reg = &adreno_gpu->info->hwcg[i], reg->offset); i++)
>> gpu_write(gpu, reg->offset, state ? reg->value : 0);
>> /* Enable SP clock */
>> - if (!adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu))
>> + if ((!adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu) || adreno_is_a619_holi(adreno_gpu)))
>> gmu_rmw(gmu, REG_A6XX_GPU_GMU_GX_SPTPRAC_CLOCK_CONTROL, 0, 1);
>> gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_RBBM_CLOCK_CNTL, state ? clock_cntl_on : 0);
>> @@ -1007,7 +1007,12 @@ static int hw_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>> }
>> /* Clear GBIF halt in case GX domain was not collapsed */
>> - if (a6xx_has_gbif(adreno_gpu)) {
>> + if (adreno_is_a619_holi(adreno_gpu)) {
>> + gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_GBIF_HALT, 0);
>> + gpu_write(gpu, 0x18, 0);
>> + /* Let's make extra sure that the GPU can access the memory.. */
>> + mb();
>> + } else if (a6xx_has_gbif(adreno_gpu)) {
>> gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_GBIF_HALT, 0);
>> gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_RBBM_GBIF_HALT, 0);
>> /* Let's make extra sure that the GPU can access the memory.. */
>> @@ -1016,6 +1021,9 @@ static int hw_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>> gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_RBBM_SECVID_TSB_CNTL, 0);
>> + if (adreno_is_a619_holi(adreno_gpu))
>> + a6xx_sptprac_enable(gmu);
>> +
>> /*
>> * Disable the trusted memory range - we don't actually supported secure
>> * memory rendering at this point in time and we don't want to block off
>> @@ -1293,7 +1301,8 @@ static void a6xx_dump(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>> #define GBIF_CLIENT_HALT_MASK BIT(0)
>> #define GBIF_ARB_HALT_MASK BIT(1)
>> #define VBIF_RESET_ACK_TIMEOUT 100
>> -#define VBIF_RESET_ACK_MASK 0x00f0
>> +#define VBIF_RESET_ACK_MASK 0xF0
>> +#define GPR0_GBIF_HALT_REQUEST 0x1E0
>> static void a6xx_recover(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>> {
>> @@ -1350,10 +1359,16 @@ static void a6xx_recover(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>> /* Software-reset the GPU */
>> if (adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu)) {
>> - /* Halt the GX side of GBIF */
>> - gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_RBBM_GBIF_HALT, GBIF_GX_HALT_MASK);
>> - spin_until(gpu_read(gpu, REG_A6XX_RBBM_GBIF_HALT_ACK) &
>> - GBIF_GX_HALT_MASK);
>> + if (adreno_is_a619_holi(adreno_gpu)) {
>> + gpu_write(gpu, 0x18, GPR0_GBIF_HALT_REQUEST);
>> + spin_until((gpu_read(gpu, REG_A6XX_RBBM_VBIF_GX_RESET_STATUS) &
>> + (VBIF_RESET_ACK_MASK)) == VBIF_RESET_ACK_MASK);
>> + } else {
>> + /* Halt the GX side of GBIF */
>> + gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_RBBM_GBIF_HALT, GBIF_GX_HALT_MASK);
>> + spin_until(gpu_read(gpu, REG_A6XX_RBBM_GBIF_HALT_ACK) &
>> + GBIF_GX_HALT_MASK);
>> + }
>> /* Halt new client requests on GBIF */
>> gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_GBIF_HALT, GBIF_CLIENT_HALT_MASK);
>> @@ -1763,6 +1778,9 @@ static int a6xx_pm_resume(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>> if (ret)
>> return ret;
>> + if (adreno_is_a619_holi(adreno_gpu))
>> + a6xx_sptprac_enable(gmu);
>> +
>> mutex_unlock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu.lock);
>> msm_devfreq_resume(gpu);
>> @@ -1795,6 +1813,9 @@ static int a6xx_pm_suspend(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>> mutex_lock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu.lock);
>> + if (adreno_is_a619_holi(adreno_gpu))
>> + a6xx_sptprac_disable(gmu);
>> +
>> ret = clk_prepare_enable(gpu->ebi1_clk);
>> if (ret)
>> return ret;
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c
>> index 82757f005a1a..71faeb3fd466 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c
>> @@ -264,6 +264,19 @@ static const struct adreno_info gpulist[] = {
>> .gmem = SZ_512K,
>> .inactive_period = DRM_MSM_INACTIVE_PERIOD,
>> .init = a6xx_gpu_init,
>> + }, {
>> + .rev = ADRENO_REV(6, 1, 9, 1),
>
> I think this deserves a comment that GMU-enabled sm6350 has patch_id 0 (if I interpreted the vendor dtsi correctly).
>
> Another option might be to actually check for the qcom,gmu presense and add that to the selection conditional.
We pass the GMU wrapper in qcom,gmu = <>, though perhaps setting
the holi-ness based on whether it's "qcom,gmu-x.y.z.a" or
"qcom,gmu-wrapper" would be wiser.. The patch ID is indeterminate
and I *think* one GMU-wrapper A619 has patch id 0..
Konrad
>
>> + .revn = 619,
>> + .name = "A619_holi",
>> + .fw = {
>> + [ADRENO_FW_SQE] = "a630_sqe.fw",
>> + },
>> + .gmem = SZ_512K,
>> + .inactive_period = DRM_MSM_INACTIVE_PERIOD,
>> + .quirks = ADRENO_QUIRK_GMU_WRAPPER,
>> + .init = a6xx_gpu_init,
>> + .zapfw = "a615_zap.mdt",
>> + .hwcg = a615_hwcg,
>> }, {
>> .rev = ADRENO_REV(6, 1, 9, ANY_ID),
>> .revn = 619,
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h
>> index 7c5e0a90b5fb..16241368c2e4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h
>> @@ -252,6 +252,11 @@ static inline int adreno_is_a619(struct adreno_gpu *gpu)
>> return gpu->revn == 619;
>> }
>> +static inline int adreno_is_a619_holi(struct adreno_gpu *gpu)
>> +{
>> + return adreno_is_a619(gpu) && adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(gpu);
>> +}
>> +
>> static inline int adreno_is_a630(struct adreno_gpu *gpu)
>> {
>> return gpu->revn == 630;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-17 21:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-14 17:31 [PATCH v2 00/14] GMU-less A6xx support (A610, A619_holi) Konrad Dybcio
2023-02-14 17:31 ` [PATCH v2 01/14] drm/msm/a6xx: De-staticize sptprac en/disable functions Konrad Dybcio
2023-02-17 20:41 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-02-14 17:31 ` [PATCH v2 02/14] drm/msm/a6xx: Extend UBWC config Konrad Dybcio
2023-02-17 20:46 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-02-17 20:51 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-02-14 17:31 ` [PATCH v2 03/14] drm/msm/a6xx: Introduce GMU wrapper support Konrad Dybcio
2023-02-17 21:37 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-02-17 21:41 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-02-17 21:44 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-02-17 21:45 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-02-14 17:31 ` [PATCH v2 04/14] drm/msm/a6xx: Remove both GBIF and RBBM GBIF halt on hw init Konrad Dybcio
2023-02-14 17:31 ` [PATCH v2 05/14] drm/msm/adreno: Disable has_cached_coherent for A610/A619_holi Konrad Dybcio
2023-02-17 20:54 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-02-14 17:31 ` [PATCH v2 06/14] drm/msm/gpu: Use dev_pm_opp_set_rate for non-GMU GPUs Konrad Dybcio
2023-02-17 21:07 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-02-18 11:04 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-02-18 16:47 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-02-20 9:59 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-02-20 10:12 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-02-20 10:45 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-02-14 17:31 ` [PATCH v2 07/14] drm/msm/a6xx: Add support for A619_holi Konrad Dybcio
2023-02-17 21:19 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-02-17 21:21 ` Konrad Dybcio [this message]
2023-02-18 13:04 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-02-14 17:31 ` [PATCH v2 08/14] drm/msm/a6xx: Add A610 support Konrad Dybcio
2023-02-17 21:42 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-02-14 17:31 ` [PATCH v2 09/14] drm/msm/a6xx: Fix some A619 tunables Konrad Dybcio
2023-02-17 21:42 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-02-14 17:31 ` [PATCH v2 10/14] drm/msm/a6xx: Fix up A6XX protected registers Konrad Dybcio
2023-02-14 21:56 ` Rob Clark
2023-02-15 0:10 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-02-15 0:38 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-02-15 1:28 ` Rob Clark
2023-02-14 17:31 ` [PATCH v2 11/14] drm/msm/a6xx: Enable optional icc voting from OPP tables Konrad Dybcio
2023-02-17 21:19 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-02-14 17:31 ` [PATCH v2 12/14] drm/msm/a6xx: Use "else if" in GPU speedbin rev matching Konrad Dybcio
2023-02-17 21:20 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-02-14 17:31 ` [PATCH v2 13/14] drm/msm/a6xx: Add A619_holi speedbin support Konrad Dybcio
2023-02-17 21:25 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-02-14 17:31 ` [PATCH v2 14/14] drm/msm/a6xx: Add A610 " Konrad Dybcio
2023-02-17 21:25 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9269c5dd-d97c-e29a-98a9-b42c598ebfc6@linaro.org \
--to=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marijn.suijten@somainline.org \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=olvaffe@gmail.com \
--cc=quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_akhilpo@quicinc.com \
--cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
--cc=sean@poorly.run \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox