* [PATCH] accel/qaic: Replace user defined overflow check
@ 2025-10-15 15:22 Youssef Samir
2025-10-15 16:01 ` Carl Vanderlip
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Youssef Samir @ 2025-10-15 15:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jeff.hugo, carl.vanderlip, troy.hanson, zachary.mckevitt
Cc: ogabbay, lizhi.hou, karol.wachowski, linux-arm-msm, dri-devel
From: Sourab Bera <quic_sourbera@quicinc.com>
Replace the current logic to check overflow, with the kernel-provided
macro `check_mul_overflow` in the function __qaic_execute_bo_ioctl().
Signed-off-by: Sourab Bera <quic_sourbera@quicinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Youssef Samir <youssef.abdulrahman@oss.qualcomm.com>
---
drivers/accel/qaic/qaic_data.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/accel/qaic/qaic_data.c b/drivers/accel/qaic/qaic_data.c
index 797289e9d780..e6f96dbb3382 100644
--- a/drivers/accel/qaic/qaic_data.c
+++ b/drivers/accel/qaic/qaic_data.c
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
#include <linux/math64.h>
#include <linux/mm.h>
#include <linux/moduleparam.h>
+#include <linux/overflow.h>
#include <linux/scatterlist.h>
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
#include <linux/srcu.h>
@@ -1305,17 +1306,17 @@ static int __qaic_execute_bo_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct dr
u64 received_ts;
u32 queue_level;
u64 submit_ts;
+ size_t size;
int rcu_id;
u32 head;
u32 tail;
- u64 size;
int ret;
received_ts = ktime_get_ns();
size = is_partial ? sizeof(struct qaic_partial_execute_entry) : sizeof(*exec);
- n = (unsigned long)size * args->hdr.count;
- if (args->hdr.count == 0 || n / args->hdr.count != size)
+ if (args->hdr.count == 0 ||
+ check_mul_overflow((unsigned long)size, (unsigned long)args->hdr.count, &n))
return -EINVAL;
user_data = u64_to_user_ptr(args->data);
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] accel/qaic: Replace user defined overflow check
2025-10-15 15:22 [PATCH] accel/qaic: Replace user defined overflow check Youssef Samir
@ 2025-10-15 16:01 ` Carl Vanderlip
2025-10-15 16:42 ` Jeff Hugo
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Carl Vanderlip @ 2025-10-15 16:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Youssef Samir, jeff.hugo, troy.hanson, zachary.mckevitt
Cc: ogabbay, lizhi.hou, karol.wachowski, linux-arm-msm, dri-devel
On 10/15/2025 8:22 AM, Youssef Samir wrote:
> From: Sourab Bera <quic_sourbera@quicinc.com>
>
> Replace the current logic to check overflow, with the kernel-provided
> macro `check_mul_overflow` in the function __qaic_execute_bo_ioctl().
>
> Signed-off-by: Sourab Bera <quic_sourbera@quicinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Youssef Samir <youssef.abdulrahman@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Carl Vanderlip <carl.vanderlip@oss.qualcomm.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] accel/qaic: Replace user defined overflow check
2025-10-15 15:22 [PATCH] accel/qaic: Replace user defined overflow check Youssef Samir
2025-10-15 16:01 ` Carl Vanderlip
@ 2025-10-15 16:42 ` Jeff Hugo
2025-10-17 15:13 ` Falkowski, Maciej
2025-10-20 15:05 ` Jeff Hugo
3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Hugo @ 2025-10-15 16:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Youssef Samir, carl.vanderlip, troy.hanson, zachary.mckevitt
Cc: ogabbay, lizhi.hou, karol.wachowski, linux-arm-msm, dri-devel
On 10/15/2025 9:22 AM, Youssef Samir wrote:
> From: Sourab Bera <quic_sourbera@quicinc.com>
>
> Replace the current logic to check overflow, with the kernel-provided
> macro `check_mul_overflow` in the function __qaic_execute_bo_ioctl().
>
> Signed-off-by: Sourab Bera <quic_sourbera@quicinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Youssef Samir <youssef.abdulrahman@oss.qualcomm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Hugo <jeff.hugo@oss.qualcomm.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] accel/qaic: Replace user defined overflow check
2025-10-15 15:22 [PATCH] accel/qaic: Replace user defined overflow check Youssef Samir
2025-10-15 16:01 ` Carl Vanderlip
2025-10-15 16:42 ` Jeff Hugo
@ 2025-10-17 15:13 ` Falkowski, Maciej
2025-10-20 15:05 ` Jeff Hugo
3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Falkowski, Maciej @ 2025-10-17 15:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Youssef Samir, jeff.hugo, carl.vanderlip, troy.hanson,
zachary.mckevitt
Cc: ogabbay, lizhi.hou, karol.wachowski, linux-arm-msm, dri-devel
Reviewed-by: Maciej Falkowski <maciej.falkowski@linux.intel.com>
On 10/15/2025 5:22 PM, Youssef Samir wrote:
> From: Sourab Bera <quic_sourbera@quicinc.com>
>
> Replace the current logic to check overflow, with the kernel-provided
> macro `check_mul_overflow` in the function __qaic_execute_bo_ioctl().
>
> Signed-off-by: Sourab Bera <quic_sourbera@quicinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Youssef Samir <youssef.abdulrahman@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
> drivers/accel/qaic/qaic_data.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/accel/qaic/qaic_data.c b/drivers/accel/qaic/qaic_data.c
> index 797289e9d780..e6f96dbb3382 100644
> --- a/drivers/accel/qaic/qaic_data.c
> +++ b/drivers/accel/qaic/qaic_data.c
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
> #include <linux/math64.h>
> #include <linux/mm.h>
> #include <linux/moduleparam.h>
> +#include <linux/overflow.h>
> #include <linux/scatterlist.h>
> #include <linux/spinlock.h>
> #include <linux/srcu.h>
> @@ -1305,17 +1306,17 @@ static int __qaic_execute_bo_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct dr
> u64 received_ts;
> u32 queue_level;
> u64 submit_ts;
> + size_t size;
> int rcu_id;
> u32 head;
> u32 tail;
> - u64 size;
> int ret;
>
> received_ts = ktime_get_ns();
>
> size = is_partial ? sizeof(struct qaic_partial_execute_entry) : sizeof(*exec);
> - n = (unsigned long)size * args->hdr.count;
> - if (args->hdr.count == 0 || n / args->hdr.count != size)
> + if (args->hdr.count == 0 ||
> + check_mul_overflow((unsigned long)size, (unsigned long)args->hdr.count, &n))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> user_data = u64_to_user_ptr(args->data);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] accel/qaic: Replace user defined overflow check
2025-10-15 15:22 [PATCH] accel/qaic: Replace user defined overflow check Youssef Samir
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2025-10-17 15:13 ` Falkowski, Maciej
@ 2025-10-20 15:05 ` Jeff Hugo
2025-10-21 16:03 ` Youssef Abdulrahman
3 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Hugo @ 2025-10-20 15:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Youssef Samir, carl.vanderlip, troy.hanson, zachary.mckevitt
Cc: ogabbay, lizhi.hou, karol.wachowski, linux-arm-msm, dri-devel
On 10/15/2025 9:22 AM, Youssef Samir wrote:
> From: Sourab Bera <quic_sourbera@quicinc.com>
>
> Replace the current logic to check overflow, with the kernel-provided
> macro `check_mul_overflow` in the function __qaic_execute_bo_ioctl().
>
> Signed-off-by: Sourab Bera <quic_sourbera@quicinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Youssef Samir <youssef.abdulrahman@oss.qualcomm.com>
Youssef,
It looks like this conflicts with "accel/qaic: Replace kcalloc +
copy_from_user with memdup_array_user". It looks like we don't need to
bring back the overflow check, which would make this change no longer
needed.
Can you have a look and see if you agree?
-Jeff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] accel/qaic: Replace user defined overflow check
2025-10-20 15:05 ` Jeff Hugo
@ 2025-10-21 16:03 ` Youssef Abdulrahman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Youssef Abdulrahman @ 2025-10-21 16:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Hugo
Cc: carl.vanderlip, troy.hanson, zachary.mckevitt, ogabbay, lizhi.hou,
karol.wachowski, linux-arm-msm, dri-devel
On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 4:05 PM Jeff Hugo <jeff.hugo@oss.qualcomm.com> wrote:
>
> On 10/15/2025 9:22 AM, Youssef Samir wrote:
> > From: Sourab Bera <quic_sourbera@quicinc.com>
> >
> > Replace the current logic to check overflow, with the kernel-provided
> > macro `check_mul_overflow` in the function __qaic_execute_bo_ioctl().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sourab Bera <quic_sourbera@quicinc.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Youssef Samir <youssef.abdulrahman@oss.qualcomm.com>
>
> Youssef,
>
> It looks like this conflicts with "accel/qaic: Replace kcalloc +
> copy_from_user with memdup_array_user". It looks like we don't need to
> bring back the overflow check, which would make this change no longer
> needed.
>
> Can you have a look and see if you agree?
Hi Jeff,
I checked it out and you're right. It doesn't apply anymore.
-Youssef
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-10-21 16:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-10-15 15:22 [PATCH] accel/qaic: Replace user defined overflow check Youssef Samir
2025-10-15 16:01 ` Carl Vanderlip
2025-10-15 16:42 ` Jeff Hugo
2025-10-17 15:13 ` Falkowski, Maciej
2025-10-20 15:05 ` Jeff Hugo
2025-10-21 16:03 ` Youssef Abdulrahman
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox